-
Something wrong with this record ?
Labor analgesia in Czech Republic and Slovakia: a 2015 national survey
J. Bláha, P. Štourač, M. Grochová, R. Klozová, S. Richterová, P. Nosková, D. Seidlová, V. Zenkner, A. Novotný, D. Schwarz, J. Ščamburová, M. Kosinová, C. Kufa, M. Kirchnerová, J. Macková, L. Várošová, R. Toboláková, J. Cepák, J. Firment, . ,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Analgesia, Epidural adverse effects methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Analgesia, Obstetrical adverse effects methods MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Slovakia MeSH
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this international survey was to describe the current practices and techniques of labor analgesia in the Czech Republic (CZE) and Slovakia (SVK). METHODS: All Czech and Slovak departments that provide obstetric anesthesia were invited to participate in a one-month (November 2015) prospective study that monitored in detail all peripartum anesthetic procedures delivered by anesthesiologists. Participating centers recorded all data on-line in the CLADE-IS database (Masaryk University, CZE). RESULTS: The response rate was 71% (70 of 95 departments in CZE, 35 of 54 centers in SVK). Participating centers represented 87.7% of all births in CZE and 66.4% of all births in SVK during the study period. Analgesia for labor, administered by anesthesiologists, was recorded in 12.5% of deliveries (CZE 12.1%, SVK 13.4%). Epidural analgesia was used in most of the cases (CZE 97.2%, SVK 99.1%) whereas spinal (CZE 1.4%, SVK 0.9%) or combined spinal-epidural (CZE 0.5%, SVK 0.0%) and intravenous remifentanil analgesia (CZE 2.4%, SVK 0.0%) were used infrequently. One fifth of the labors with analgesia administered by anesthesiologists (CZE 20.2%, SVK 20.5%) terminated in cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: Although labor analgesia was available in all Czech and Slovak obstetric centers, only a small proportion of parturients received an effective method of labor pain relief (regional or intravenous analgesia).
České Budějovice Hospital České Budějovice Czech Republic
Derera Hospital Bratislava Slovakia
Institute for Care of Mother and Child Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
L Pasteur University Hospital Košice Slovakia
Medical Faculty of Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Petržalka University Hospital Bratislava Slovakia
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19000725
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231026104743.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190107s2018 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.04.001 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29773486
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Bláha, J $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Labor analgesia in Czech Republic and Slovakia: a 2015 national survey / $c J. Bláha, P. Štourač, M. Grochová, R. Klozová, S. Richterová, P. Nosková, D. Seidlová, V. Zenkner, A. Novotný, D. Schwarz, J. Ščamburová, M. Kosinová, C. Kufa, M. Kirchnerová, J. Macková, L. Várošová, R. Toboláková, J. Cepák, J. Firment, . ,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The purpose of this international survey was to describe the current practices and techniques of labor analgesia in the Czech Republic (CZE) and Slovakia (SVK). METHODS: All Czech and Slovak departments that provide obstetric anesthesia were invited to participate in a one-month (November 2015) prospective study that monitored in detail all peripartum anesthetic procedures delivered by anesthesiologists. Participating centers recorded all data on-line in the CLADE-IS database (Masaryk University, CZE). RESULTS: The response rate was 71% (70 of 95 departments in CZE, 35 of 54 centers in SVK). Participating centers represented 87.7% of all births in CZE and 66.4% of all births in SVK during the study period. Analgesia for labor, administered by anesthesiologists, was recorded in 12.5% of deliveries (CZE 12.1%, SVK 13.4%). Epidural analgesia was used in most of the cases (CZE 97.2%, SVK 99.1%) whereas spinal (CZE 1.4%, SVK 0.9%) or combined spinal-epidural (CZE 0.5%, SVK 0.0%) and intravenous remifentanil analgesia (CZE 2.4%, SVK 0.0%) were used infrequently. One fifth of the labors with analgesia administered by anesthesiologists (CZE 20.2%, SVK 20.5%) terminated in cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: Although labor analgesia was available in all Czech and Slovak obstetric centers, only a small proportion of parturients received an effective method of labor pain relief (regional or intravenous analgesia).
- 650 _2
- $a epidurální analgezie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D015360
- 650 _2
- $a porodnická analgezie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D016362
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a Slovenská republika $7 D018154
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Štourač, P $u Medical Faculty of Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: petr.stourac@gmail.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Grochová, Monika, $d 1949- $7 xx0237392 $u L. Pasteur University Hospital, Košice, Slovakia.
- 700 1_
- $a Klozová, Radka $7 xx0237387 $u Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Richterová, Stanislava, $u University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovakia. $d 1969- $7 xx0267890
- 700 1_
- $a Nosková, P $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Seidlová, D $u Medical Faculty of Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zenkner, Valter $u Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0309040
- 700 1_
- $a Novotný, A $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Schwarz, D $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ščamburová, J $u Institute for Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kosinová, M $u Medical Faculty of Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kufa, Ch $u University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kirchnerová, M $u Palacky University in Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Macková, J $u Derera Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.
- 700 1_
- $a Várošová, L $u Petržalka University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.
- 700 1_
- $a Toboláková, R $u GPN, Bratislava, Slovakia.
- 700 1_
- $a Cepák, J $u České Budějovice Hospital, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Firment, J $u L. Pasteur University Hospital, Košice, Slovakia.
- 700 1_
- $a ,
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009903 $t International journal of obstetric anesthesia $x 1532-3374 $g Roč. 35, č. - (2018), s. 42-51
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29773486 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231026104738 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1364744 $s 1038848
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 35 $c - $d 42-51 $e 20180407 $i 1532-3374 $m International journal of obstetric anesthesia $n Int J Obstet Anesth $x MED00009903
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190107