-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Virulence-associated genes and antibiotic susceptibility among vaginal and rectal Escherichia coli isolates from healthy pregnant women in Poland
A. Kaczmarek, K. Skowron, A. Budzyńska, E. Gospodarek-Komkowska,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky farmakologie MeSH
- bakteriální geny genetika MeSH
- bakteriální léková rezistence MeSH
- DNA bakterií MeSH
- Escherichia coli účinky léků genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- faktory virulence genetika MeSH
- infekce vyvolané Escherichia coli mikrobiologie MeSH
- infekční komplikace v těhotenství mikrobiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikrobiální testy citlivosti MeSH
- rektum mikrobiologie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- vagina mikrobiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Polsko MeSH
Vaginal and/or rectal Escherichia coli colonization of pregnant women is sometimes associated with neonatal infections. Despite the relevance of these strains, they have been rarely described before. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare vaginal (VEC) and rectal E. coli (REC) isolates in respect of antimicrobial susceptibility and the frequency of virulence-associated genes (VAGs). The antimicrobial susceptibility of 50 VEC and 50 REC isolates was performed by using the disc diffusion method, and VAGs were detected by PCR. There were no significant differences in the antimicrobial resistance between VEC and REC. Both VEC and REC isolates were mostly resistant to ticarcillin (36 and 30%) and ampicillin (36 and 22%). None of the tested isolates was positive for ESBL. Gene's fimH, fimA, sfa/foc, iutA, ibeA, hlyF, and neuC were detected, respectively, in 98, 92, 32, 28, 12, 8, and 2% of VEC and in 94, 72, 12, 34, 8, 10, and 8% of REC isolates. The co-occurrence of fimA/H and sfa/foc genes was significantly more prevalent among VEC isolates, in comparison to REC isolates. The study indicated that VEC and REC isolates are quite similar in terms of antimicrobial non-susceptibility and VAGs.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19002805
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190116123310.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190116s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s12223-018-0598-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29644511
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kaczmarek, Agnieszka $u Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 9 M. Skłodowskiej-Curie Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland. aga_kaczmarek@poczta.onet.pl.
- 245 10
- $a Virulence-associated genes and antibiotic susceptibility among vaginal and rectal Escherichia coli isolates from healthy pregnant women in Poland / $c A. Kaczmarek, K. Skowron, A. Budzyńska, E. Gospodarek-Komkowska,
- 520 9_
- $a Vaginal and/or rectal Escherichia coli colonization of pregnant women is sometimes associated with neonatal infections. Despite the relevance of these strains, they have been rarely described before. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare vaginal (VEC) and rectal E. coli (REC) isolates in respect of antimicrobial susceptibility and the frequency of virulence-associated genes (VAGs). The antimicrobial susceptibility of 50 VEC and 50 REC isolates was performed by using the disc diffusion method, and VAGs were detected by PCR. There were no significant differences in the antimicrobial resistance between VEC and REC. Both VEC and REC isolates were mostly resistant to ticarcillin (36 and 30%) and ampicillin (36 and 22%). None of the tested isolates was positive for ESBL. Gene's fimH, fimA, sfa/foc, iutA, ibeA, hlyF, and neuC were detected, respectively, in 98, 92, 32, 28, 12, 8, and 2% of VEC and in 94, 72, 12, 34, 8, 10, and 8% of REC isolates. The co-occurrence of fimA/H and sfa/foc genes was significantly more prevalent among VEC isolates, in comparison to REC isolates. The study indicated that VEC and REC isolates are quite similar in terms of antimicrobial non-susceptibility and VAGs.
- 650 _2
- $a antibakteriální látky $x farmakologie $7 D000900
- 650 _2
- $a DNA bakterií $7 D004269
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriální léková rezistence $7 D024881
- 650 _2
- $a Escherichia coli $x účinky léků $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D004926
- 650 _2
- $a infekce vyvolané Escherichia coli $x mikrobiologie $7 D004927
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriální geny $x genetika $7 D005798
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mikrobiální testy citlivosti $7 D008826
- 650 _2
- $a Polsko $7 D011044
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a infekční komplikace v těhotenství $x mikrobiologie $7 D011251
- 650 _2
- $a rektum $x mikrobiologie $7 D012007
- 650 _2
- $a vagina $x mikrobiologie $7 D014621
- 650 _2
- $a faktory virulence $x genetika $7 D037521
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Skowron, Krzysztof $u Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 9 M. Skłodowskiej-Curie Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Budzyńska, Anna $u Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 9 M. Skłodowskiej-Curie Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Gospodarek-Komkowska, Eugenia $u Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 9 M. Skłodowskiej-Curie Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 63, č. 5 (2018), s. 637-643
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29644511 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190116 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190116123521 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1367982 $s 1040963
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 63 $c 5 $d 637-643 $e 20180412 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190116