-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The effects of sustained manual pressure stimulation according to Vojta Therapy on heart rate variability
J. Opavsky, M. Slachtova, M. Kutin, P. Hok, P. Uhlir, H. Opavska, P. Hlustik
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
PubMed
29795544
DOI
10.5507/bp.2018.028
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- autonomní nervový systém fyziologie MeSH
- dechová frekvence fyziologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fyzikální stimulace metody MeSH
- jednoduchá slepá metoda MeSH
- klinické křížové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- noha (od hlezna dolů) fyziologie MeSH
- reflexní terapie metody MeSH
- srdeční frekvence fyziologie MeSH
- tlak MeSH
- zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: The physiotherapeutic technique of Vojta reflex locomotion is often accompanied by various autonomic activity changes and unpleasant sensations. It is unknown whether these effects are specific to Vojta Therapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare changes in cardiac autonomic control after Vojta reflex locomotion stimulation and after an appropriate sham stimulation. METHODS: A total of 28 young healthy adults (20.4 - 25.7 years) were enrolled in this single-blind randomized cross-over study. Participants underwent two modes of 20-minute sustained manual pressure stimulation on the surface of the foot on two separate visits. One mode used manual pressure on the lateral heel, i.e., in a zone employed in the Vojta Therapy (active stimulation). The other mode used pressure on the lateral ankle (control), in an area not included among the active zones used by Vojta Therapy and whose activation does not evoke manifestations of reflex locomotion. Autonomic nervous system activity was evaluated using spectral analysis of heart rate variability before and after the intervention. RESULTS: The active stimulation was perceived as more unpleasant than the control stimulation. Heart rate variability parameters demonstrated almost identical autonomic responses after both stimulation types, showing either modest increase in parasympathetic activity, or increased heart rate variability with similar contribution of parasympathetic and sympathetic activity. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate changes of cardiac autonomic control in both active and control stimulation, without evidence for a significant difference between the two.
Department of Physiotherapy Faculty of Health Sciences Palacky University Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Physiotherapy Faculty of Physical Culture Palacky University Olomouc Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19003009
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190205141442.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190116s2018 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2018.028 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29795544
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Opavský, Jaroslav, $u Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1951- $7 nlk19990073634
- 245 14
- $a The effects of sustained manual pressure stimulation according to Vojta Therapy on heart rate variability / $c J. Opavsky, M. Slachtova, M. Kutin, P. Hok, P. Uhlir, H. Opavska, P. Hlustik
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The physiotherapeutic technique of Vojta reflex locomotion is often accompanied by various autonomic activity changes and unpleasant sensations. It is unknown whether these effects are specific to Vojta Therapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare changes in cardiac autonomic control after Vojta reflex locomotion stimulation and after an appropriate sham stimulation. METHODS: A total of 28 young healthy adults (20.4 - 25.7 years) were enrolled in this single-blind randomized cross-over study. Participants underwent two modes of 20-minute sustained manual pressure stimulation on the surface of the foot on two separate visits. One mode used manual pressure on the lateral heel, i.e., in a zone employed in the Vojta Therapy (active stimulation). The other mode used pressure on the lateral ankle (control), in an area not included among the active zones used by Vojta Therapy and whose activation does not evoke manifestations of reflex locomotion. Autonomic nervous system activity was evaluated using spectral analysis of heart rate variability before and after the intervention. RESULTS: The active stimulation was perceived as more unpleasant than the control stimulation. Heart rate variability parameters demonstrated almost identical autonomic responses after both stimulation types, showing either modest increase in parasympathetic activity, or increased heart rate variability with similar contribution of parasympathetic and sympathetic activity. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate changes of cardiac autonomic control in both active and control stimulation, without evidence for a significant difference between the two.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a autonomní nervový systém $x fyziologie $7 D001341
- 650 _2
- $a klinické křížové studie $7 D018592
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a noha (od hlezna dolů) $x fyziologie $7 D005528
- 650 _2
- $a zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie $7 D064368
- 650 _2
- $a srdeční frekvence $x fyziologie $7 D006339
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a fyzikální stimulace $x metody $7 D010812
- 650 _2
- $a tlak $7 D011312
- 650 _2
- $a reflexní terapie $x metody $7 D012028
- 650 _2
- $a dechová frekvence $x fyziologie $7 D056152
- 650 _2
- $a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Vodičková, Martina, $u Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1972- $7 kup19990000107855
- 700 1_
- $a Kutín, Miroslav $u Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic; KM KINEPRO PLUS s.r.o., Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 _AN097977
- 700 1_
- $a Hok, Pavel $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0232562
- 700 1_
- $a Uhlíř, Petr $u Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 ola2008434640
- 700 1_
- $a Opavská, Hana $u Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0230549
- 700 1_
- $a Hluštík, Petr, $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1964- $7 xx0074066
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 162, č. 3 (2018), s. 206-211
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29795544 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190116 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190204083311 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1373960 $s 1041171
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 162 $c 3 $d 206-211 $e 20180523 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20190116