Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Recruitment of 53BP1 Proteins for DNA Repair and Persistence of Repair Clusters Differ for Cell Types as Detected by Single Molecule Localization Microscopy

E. Bobkova, D. Depes, JH. Lee, L. Jezkova, I. Falkova, E. Pagacova, O. Kopecna, M. Zadneprianetc, A. Bacikova, E. Kulikova, E. Smirnova, T. Bulanova, A. Boreyko, E. Krasavin, F. Wenz, F. Bestvater, G. Hildenbrand, M. Hausmann, M. Falk,

. 2018 ; 19 (12) : . [pub] 20181122

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
NV16-29835A MZ0 CEP Register

DNA double stranded breaks (DSBs) are the most serious type of lesions introduced into chromatin by ionizing radiation. During DSB repair, cells recruit different proteins to the damaged sites in a manner dependent on local chromatin structure, DSB location in the nucleus, and the repair pathway entered. 53BP1 is one of the important players participating in repair pathway decision of the cell. Although many molecular biology details have been investigated, the architecture of 53BP1 repair foci and its development during the post-irradiation time, especially the period of protein recruitment, remains to be elucidated. Super-resolution light microscopy is a powerful new tool to approach such studies in 3D-conserved cell nuclei. Recently, we demonstrated the applicability of single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) as one of these highly resolving methods for analyses of dynamic repair protein distribution and repair focus internal nano-architecture in intact cell nuclei. In the present study, we focused our investigation on 53BP1 foci in differently radio-resistant cell types, moderately radio-resistant neonatal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) and highly radio-resistant U87 glioblastoma cells, exposed to high-LET 15N-ion radiation. At given time points up to 24 h post irradiation with doses of 1.3 Gy and 4.0 Gy, the coordinates and spatial distribution of fluorescently tagged 53BP1 molecules was quantitatively evaluated at the resolution of 10⁻20 nm. Clusters of these tags were determined as sub-units of repair foci according to SMLM parameters. The formation and relaxation of such clusters was studied. The higher dose generated sufficient numbers of DNA breaks to compare the post-irradiation dynamics of 53BP1 during DSB processing for the cell types studied. A perpendicular (90°) irradiation scheme was used with the 4.0 Gy dose to achieve better separation of a relatively high number of particle tracks typically crossing each nucleus. For analyses along ion-tracks, the dose was reduced to 1.3 Gy and applied in combination with a sharp angle irradiation (10° relative to the cell plane). The results reveal a higher ratio of 53BP1 proteins recruited into SMLM defined clusters in fibroblasts as compared to U87 cells. Moreover, the speed of foci and thus cluster formation and relaxation also differed for the cell types. In both NHDF and U87 cells, a certain number of the detected and functionally relevant clusters remained persistent even 24 h post irradiation; however, the number of these clusters again varied for the cell types. Altogether, our findings indicate that repair cluster formation as determined by SMLM and the relaxation (i.e., the remaining 53BP1 tags no longer fulfill the cluster definition) is cell type dependent and may be functionally explained and correlated to cell specific radio-sensitivity. The present study demonstrates that SMLM is a highly appropriate method for investigations of spatiotemporal protein organization in cell nuclei and how it influences the cell decision for a particular repair pathway at a given DSB site.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012113
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190405101224.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/ijms19123713 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30469529
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Bobkova, Elizaveta $u Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. elizaveta.bobkova@outlook.de.
245    10
$a Recruitment of 53BP1 Proteins for DNA Repair and Persistence of Repair Clusters Differ for Cell Types as Detected by Single Molecule Localization Microscopy / $c E. Bobkova, D. Depes, JH. Lee, L. Jezkova, I. Falkova, E. Pagacova, O. Kopecna, M. Zadneprianetc, A. Bacikova, E. Kulikova, E. Smirnova, T. Bulanova, A. Boreyko, E. Krasavin, F. Wenz, F. Bestvater, G. Hildenbrand, M. Hausmann, M. Falk,
520    9_
$a DNA double stranded breaks (DSBs) are the most serious type of lesions introduced into chromatin by ionizing radiation. During DSB repair, cells recruit different proteins to the damaged sites in a manner dependent on local chromatin structure, DSB location in the nucleus, and the repair pathway entered. 53BP1 is one of the important players participating in repair pathway decision of the cell. Although many molecular biology details have been investigated, the architecture of 53BP1 repair foci and its development during the post-irradiation time, especially the period of protein recruitment, remains to be elucidated. Super-resolution light microscopy is a powerful new tool to approach such studies in 3D-conserved cell nuclei. Recently, we demonstrated the applicability of single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) as one of these highly resolving methods for analyses of dynamic repair protein distribution and repair focus internal nano-architecture in intact cell nuclei. In the present study, we focused our investigation on 53BP1 foci in differently radio-resistant cell types, moderately radio-resistant neonatal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) and highly radio-resistant U87 glioblastoma cells, exposed to high-LET 15N-ion radiation. At given time points up to 24 h post irradiation with doses of 1.3 Gy and 4.0 Gy, the coordinates and spatial distribution of fluorescently tagged 53BP1 molecules was quantitatively evaluated at the resolution of 10⁻20 nm. Clusters of these tags were determined as sub-units of repair foci according to SMLM parameters. The formation and relaxation of such clusters was studied. The higher dose generated sufficient numbers of DNA breaks to compare the post-irradiation dynamics of 53BP1 during DSB processing for the cell types studied. A perpendicular (90°) irradiation scheme was used with the 4.0 Gy dose to achieve better separation of a relatively high number of particle tracks typically crossing each nucleus. For analyses along ion-tracks, the dose was reduced to 1.3 Gy and applied in combination with a sharp angle irradiation (10° relative to the cell plane). The results reveal a higher ratio of 53BP1 proteins recruited into SMLM defined clusters in fibroblasts as compared to U87 cells. Moreover, the speed of foci and thus cluster formation and relaxation also differed for the cell types. In both NHDF and U87 cells, a certain number of the detected and functionally relevant clusters remained persistent even 24 h post irradiation; however, the number of these clusters again varied for the cell types. Altogether, our findings indicate that repair cluster formation as determined by SMLM and the relaxation (i.e., the remaining 53BP1 tags no longer fulfill the cluster definition) is cell type dependent and may be functionally explained and correlated to cell specific radio-sensitivity. The present study demonstrates that SMLM is a highly appropriate method for investigations of spatiotemporal protein organization in cell nuclei and how it influences the cell decision for a particular repair pathway at a given DSB site.
650    _2
$a nádorové buněčné linie $7 D045744
650    _2
$a kultivované buňky $7 D002478
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a konfokální mikroskopie $x metody $7 D018613
650    _2
$a transport proteinů $7 D021381
650    12
$a rekombinační oprava DNA $7 D059767
650    _2
$a zobrazení jednotlivé molekuly $x metody $7 D000072760
650    _2
$a 53BP1 $x metabolismus $7 D000071857
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Depes, Daniel $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. depesd26@gmail.com.
700    1_
$a Lee, Jin-Ho $u Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Jin-Ho.Lee@kip.uni-heidelberg.de.
700    1_
$a Jezkova, Lucie $u Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia. jezkova.luc@gmail.com.
700    1_
$a Falkova, Iva $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. ivafalk@ibp.cz.
700    1_
$a Pagacova, Eva $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. evien@centrum.cz.
700    1_
$a Kopecna, Olga $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. olga.kop@centrum.cz.
700    1_
$a Zadneprianetc, Mariia $u Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia. marysaveleva@mail.ru.
700    1_
$a Bacikova, Alena $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. bacikovaalena@seznam.cz.
700    1_
$a Kulikova, Elena $u Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia. kruglyakovaea@bk.ru.
700    1_
$a Smirnova, Elena $u Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia. b-elva@mail.ru.
700    1_
$a Bulanova, Tatiana $u Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia. bulanova@jinr.ru.
700    1_
$a Boreyko, Alla $u Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia. albor@jinr.ru.
700    1_
$a Krasavin, Evgeny $u Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia. krasavin@jinr.ru.
700    1_
$a Wenz, Frederik $u Department Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor- Kutzer-Ufer 3-5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany. Frederik.Wenz@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.
700    1_
$a Bestvater, Felix $u German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. f.bestvater@dkfz.de.
700    1_
$a Hildenbrand, Georg $u Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. hilden@kip.uni-heidelberg.de. Department Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor- Kutzer-Ufer 3-5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany. hilden@kip.uni-heidelberg.de.
700    1_
$a Hausmann, Michael $u Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. hausmann@kip.uni-heidelberg.de.
700    1_
$a Falk, Martin $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic. falk@ibp.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00176142 $t International journal of molecular sciences $x 1422-0067 $g Roč. 19, č. 12 (2018)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30469529 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190405101233 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1391423 $s 1050418
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 19 $c 12 $e 20181122 $i 1422-0067 $m International journal of molecular sciences $n Int J Mol Sci $x MED00176142
GRA    __
$a NV16-29835A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...