-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Can obligate apomixis and more stable reproductive assurance explain the distributional successes of asexual triploids in Hieracium alpinum (Asteraceae)
P. Mráz, P. Zdvořák, M. Hartmann, M. Štefánek, J. Chrtek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
30369009
DOI
10.1111/plb.12930
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- apomixie * MeSH
- Asteraceae genetika fyziologie MeSH
- diploidie MeSH
- endosperm fyziologie MeSH
- ovoce růst a vývoj MeSH
- průtoková cytometrie MeSH
- rozmnožování MeSH
- semena rostlinná růst a vývoj MeSH
- triploidie * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Although reproductive assurance has been suggested to be one of the most important factors shaping the differential distributional patterns between sexuals and asexuals (geographic parthenogenesis), it has only rarely been studied in natural populations of vascular plants with autonomous apomixis. Moreover, there are almost no data concerning the putative relationship between the level of apomictic versus sexual plant reproduction on one hand, and reproductive assurance on the other. We assessed the level of sexual versus apomictic reproduction in diploid and triploid plants of Hieracium alpinum across its distributional range using flow cytometric analyses of seeds, and compared the level of potential and realized seed set, i.e. reproductive assurance, between the two cytotypes under field and greenhouse conditions. Flow cytometric screening of embryos and endosperms of more than 4,100 seeds showed that diploids produced solely diploid progeny sexually, while triploids produced triploid progeny by obligate apomixis. Potential fruit set was much the same in diploids and triploids from the field and the greenhouse experiment. While in the pollination-limited environment in the greenhouse apomictic triploids had considerably higher realized fruit set than sexual diploids, there was no significant difference between cytotypes under natural conditions. In addition, sexuals varied to a significantly larger extent in realized fruit set than asexuals under both natural and greenhouse conditions. Our results indicate that triploid plants reproduce by obligate apomixis, assuring more stable and predictable fruit reproduction when compared to sexual diploids. This advantage could provide apomictic triploids with a superior colonisation ability, mirrored in a strong geographic parthenogenesis pattern observed in this species.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012210
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190416112915.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2019 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/plb.12930 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30369009
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Mráz, P $u Herbarium and Department of Botany, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Can obligate apomixis and more stable reproductive assurance explain the distributional successes of asexual triploids in Hieracium alpinum (Asteraceae) / $c P. Mráz, P. Zdvořák, M. Hartmann, M. Štefánek, J. Chrtek,
- 520 9_
- $a Although reproductive assurance has been suggested to be one of the most important factors shaping the differential distributional patterns between sexuals and asexuals (geographic parthenogenesis), it has only rarely been studied in natural populations of vascular plants with autonomous apomixis. Moreover, there are almost no data concerning the putative relationship between the level of apomictic versus sexual plant reproduction on one hand, and reproductive assurance on the other. We assessed the level of sexual versus apomictic reproduction in diploid and triploid plants of Hieracium alpinum across its distributional range using flow cytometric analyses of seeds, and compared the level of potential and realized seed set, i.e. reproductive assurance, between the two cytotypes under field and greenhouse conditions. Flow cytometric screening of embryos and endosperms of more than 4,100 seeds showed that diploids produced solely diploid progeny sexually, while triploids produced triploid progeny by obligate apomixis. Potential fruit set was much the same in diploids and triploids from the field and the greenhouse experiment. While in the pollination-limited environment in the greenhouse apomictic triploids had considerably higher realized fruit set than sexual diploids, there was no significant difference between cytotypes under natural conditions. In addition, sexuals varied to a significantly larger extent in realized fruit set than asexuals under both natural and greenhouse conditions. Our results indicate that triploid plants reproduce by obligate apomixis, assuring more stable and predictable fruit reproduction when compared to sexual diploids. This advantage could provide apomictic triploids with a superior colonisation ability, mirrored in a strong geographic parthenogenesis pattern observed in this species.
- 650 12
- $a apomixie $7 D060832
- 650 _2
- $a Asteraceae $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D019659
- 650 _2
- $a diploidie $7 D004171
- 650 _2
- $a endosperm $x fyziologie $7 D056625
- 650 _2
- $a průtoková cytometrie $7 D005434
- 650 _2
- $a ovoce $x růst a vývoj $7 D005638
- 650 _2
- $a rozmnožování $7 D012098
- 650 _2
- $a semena rostlinná $x růst a vývoj $7 D012639
- 650 12
- $a triploidie $7 D057885
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Zdvořák, P $u Herbarium and Department of Botany, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hartmann, M $u Herbarium and Department of Botany, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Štefánek, M $u Herbarium and Department of Botany, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Chrtek, J $u Herbarium and Department of Botany, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181060 $t Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) $x 1438-8677 $g Roč. 21, č. 2 (2019), s. 227-236
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30369009 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190416112941 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391520 $s 1050515
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 21 $c 2 $d 227-236 $e 20181211 $i 1438-8677 $m Plant biology $n Plant Biol (Stuttg) $x MED00181060
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405