• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Cryopreservation effects on a viable sperm sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) subpopulation obtained by a Percoll density gradient method

Y. Horokhovatskyi, MA. Dietrich, I. Lebeda, P. Fedorov, M. Rodina, B. Dzyuba,

. 2018 ; 13 (8) : e0202514. [pub] 20180816

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19012458

In many fish species, sperm cryopreservation has deleterious effects and leads to a significant decrease in spermatozoa viability. However, the effect of cryopreservation on sperm cells that survive this process and are still viable is not fully understood. The objective of this study was to compare the viability and proteomes of fresh and cryopreserved sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) sperm samples before and after live-dead cell separation using Percoll density gradient centrifugation. Both fresh and cryopreserved sperm samples were divided into two groups (with or without application of Percoll separation). At each step of the experiment, sperm quality was evaluated by video microscopy combined with integrated computer-assisted sperm analysis software and flow cytometry for live-dead sperm viability analysis. Sperm motility and the percentage of live cells were reduced in the cryopreserved group compared to the fresh group from 89% to 33% for percentage of motility and from 96% to 70% for live cells. Straight line velocity and linearity of track were significantly lower in cryopreserved samples than in those separated by Percoll before and after cryopreservation. However, the percentages of motile and live spermatozoa were higher than 90% in samples subjected to Percoll separation. Proteomic analysis of spermatozoa by two-dimensional differences in-gel electrophoresis coupled with matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight/time-of-flight mass spectrometry revealed that 20 protein spot abundances underwent significant changes in cryopreserved samples compared to fresh ones. However, only one protein spot was significantly altered when samples before and after cryopreservation followed by Percoll separation were compared. Thus, the results of this study show that cryopreservation leads to minimal proteomic changes in the spermatozoa population, retaining high motility and viability parameters. The results also suggest that global differences in protein profiles between unselected fresh and cryopreserved samples are mainly due to protein loss or changes in the lethal and sublethal damaged cell subpopulations.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012458
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190409160803.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0202514 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30114243
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Horokhovatskyi, Yevhen $u Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Vodnany, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Cryopreservation effects on a viable sperm sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) subpopulation obtained by a Percoll density gradient method / $c Y. Horokhovatskyi, MA. Dietrich, I. Lebeda, P. Fedorov, M. Rodina, B. Dzyuba,
520    9_
$a In many fish species, sperm cryopreservation has deleterious effects and leads to a significant decrease in spermatozoa viability. However, the effect of cryopreservation on sperm cells that survive this process and are still viable is not fully understood. The objective of this study was to compare the viability and proteomes of fresh and cryopreserved sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) sperm samples before and after live-dead cell separation using Percoll density gradient centrifugation. Both fresh and cryopreserved sperm samples were divided into two groups (with or without application of Percoll separation). At each step of the experiment, sperm quality was evaluated by video microscopy combined with integrated computer-assisted sperm analysis software and flow cytometry for live-dead sperm viability analysis. Sperm motility and the percentage of live cells were reduced in the cryopreserved group compared to the fresh group from 89% to 33% for percentage of motility and from 96% to 70% for live cells. Straight line velocity and linearity of track were significantly lower in cryopreserved samples than in those separated by Percoll before and after cryopreservation. However, the percentages of motile and live spermatozoa were higher than 90% in samples subjected to Percoll separation. Proteomic analysis of spermatozoa by two-dimensional differences in-gel electrophoresis coupled with matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight/time-of-flight mass spectrometry revealed that 20 protein spot abundances underwent significant changes in cryopreserved samples compared to fresh ones. However, only one protein spot was significantly altered when samples before and after cryopreservation followed by Percoll separation were compared. Thus, the results of this study show that cryopreservation leads to minimal proteomic changes in the spermatozoa population, retaining high motility and viability parameters. The results also suggest that global differences in protein profiles between unselected fresh and cryopreserved samples are mainly due to protein loss or changes in the lethal and sublethal damaged cell subpopulations.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a viabilita buněk $x fyziologie $7 D002470
650    _2
$a centrifugace - gradient hustoty $x metody $7 D002499
650    _2
$a kryoprezervace $x metody $7 D015925
650    _2
$a ryby $x fyziologie $7 D005399
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a povidon $x chemie $7 D011205
650    _2
$a proteomika $7 D040901
650    _2
$a uchování spermatu $x metody $7 D012662
650    _2
$a oxid křemičitý $x chemie $7 D012822
650    _2
$a motilita spermií $x fyziologie $7 D013081
650    _2
$a spermie $x fyziologie $7 D013094
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dietrich, Mariola A $u Department of Gametes and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Olsztyn, Poland.
700    1_
$a Lebeda, Ievgen $u Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Vodnany, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fedorov, Pavlo $u Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Vodnany, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rodina, Marek $u Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Vodnany, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Dzyuba, Borys $u Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Vodnany, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 13, č. 8 (2018), s. e0202514
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30114243 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190409160818 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1391768 $s 1050763
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 13 $c 8 $d e0202514 $e 20180816 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405
Zpět

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace