• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Factors influencing sessions' and speakers' evaluation: an analysis of seven consecutive European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology congress editions

S. Cazzaniga, L. Scerri, JP. Gabbud, P. Arenberger, L. Borradori, L. Naldi,

. 2018 ; 32 (12) : 2307-2313. [pub] 20180805

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19012553

BACKGROUND: The variables affecting participants' satisfaction with a scientific conference in dermatology have not been systematically assessed. The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) has collected a huge number of questionnaires related to sessions' and speakers' evaluation over the years. The critical analysis of satisfaction's score is important and helpful for continuous improvement of the scientific programming. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that positively or negatively affect sessions' and speakers' scoring in the largest European congress of dermatology. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all sessions' evaluation forms collected between 2009 and 2015 during seven consecutive EADV congresses. A predictive model for sessions' and another for speakers' score evaluation were built based on multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 4964 speakers and 1022 sessions were evaluated. Topics more positively associated with total sessions' scoring were as follows: dermoscopy, neutrophilic diseases and hidradenitis suppurativa. Conversely, types of sessions which considerably negatively associated with total sessions' scoring included short thematic presentations and free communications. Furthermore, types of sessions which were more positively associated with high total speakers' scoring consisted of focus sessions and plenary lectures, whereas the most appreciated topics encompassed dermoscopy, screening programs, melanocytic naevi, panniculitis, organ transplanted and immunosuppressed patients, neutrophilic diseases, dermatopathology and history of dermatology. Finally, short thematic presentations, free communications and guidelines session showed overall poor scores. CONCLUSION: Focused and specialized topics are more prone to capture attention of participants when compared to sessions of heterogeneous content. Quite surprisingly, a practice-oriented topics such as guidelines, did not achieve a high score. Our findings provide new knowledge about components, which increase the level of satisfaction of participants and should facilitate the programming of attractive scientific congresses associated with increased training satisfaction.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012553
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190415134449.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jdv.15178 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29992638
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Cazzaniga, S $u Department of Dermatology, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Centro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy.
245    10
$a Factors influencing sessions' and speakers' evaluation: an analysis of seven consecutive European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology congress editions / $c S. Cazzaniga, L. Scerri, JP. Gabbud, P. Arenberger, L. Borradori, L. Naldi,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The variables affecting participants' satisfaction with a scientific conference in dermatology have not been systematically assessed. The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) has collected a huge number of questionnaires related to sessions' and speakers' evaluation over the years. The critical analysis of satisfaction's score is important and helpful for continuous improvement of the scientific programming. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that positively or negatively affect sessions' and speakers' scoring in the largest European congress of dermatology. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all sessions' evaluation forms collected between 2009 and 2015 during seven consecutive EADV congresses. A predictive model for sessions' and another for speakers' score evaluation were built based on multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 4964 speakers and 1022 sessions were evaluated. Topics more positively associated with total sessions' scoring were as follows: dermoscopy, neutrophilic diseases and hidradenitis suppurativa. Conversely, types of sessions which considerably negatively associated with total sessions' scoring included short thematic presentations and free communications. Furthermore, types of sessions which were more positively associated with high total speakers' scoring consisted of focus sessions and plenary lectures, whereas the most appreciated topics encompassed dermoscopy, screening programs, melanocytic naevi, panniculitis, organ transplanted and immunosuppressed patients, neutrophilic diseases, dermatopathology and history of dermatology. Finally, short thematic presentations, free communications and guidelines session showed overall poor scores. CONCLUSION: Focused and specialized topics are more prone to capture attention of participants when compared to sessions of heterogeneous content. Quite surprisingly, a practice-oriented topics such as guidelines, did not achieve a high score. Our findings provide new knowledge about components, which increase the level of satisfaction of participants and should facilitate the programming of attractive scientific congresses associated with increased training satisfaction.
650    _2
$a biomedicínský výzkum $7 D035843
650    _2
$a kongresy jako téma $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $x trendy $7 D003226
650    _2
$a chování spotřebitelů $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003258
650    12
$a dermatologie $7 D003880
650    _2
$a kontinuální vzdělávání lékařů $x normy $7 D004502
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a společnosti lékařské $7 D012955
650    12
$a venerologie $7 D014686
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Scerri, L $u CME-CPD Committee, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Lugano, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Gabbud, J P $u European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Lugano, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Arenberger, P $u CME-CPD Committee, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Lugano, Switzerland. Department of Dermatovenereology, Charles University 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Borradori, L $u Department of Dermatology, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Naldi, L $u Centro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy. Dermatology Unit, San Bortolo Hospital - Azienda ULSS8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy.
773    0_
$w MED00002983 $t Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology JEADV $x 1468-3083 $g Roč. 32, č. 12 (2018), s. 2307-2313
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29992638 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190415134512 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1391863 $s 1050858
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 32 $c 12 $d 2307-2313 $e 20180805 $i 1468-3083 $m Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology $n J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol $x MED00002983
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...