-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Factors influencing sessions' and speakers' evaluation: an analysis of seven consecutive European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology congress editions
S. Cazzaniga, L. Scerri, JP. Gabbud, P. Arenberger, L. Borradori, L. Naldi,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
29992638
DOI
10.1111/jdv.15178
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biomedicínský výzkum MeSH
- chování spotřebitelů statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- dermatologie * MeSH
- kongresy jako téma normy statistika a číselné údaje trendy MeSH
- kontinuální vzdělávání lékařů normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- společnosti lékařské * MeSH
- venerologie * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The variables affecting participants' satisfaction with a scientific conference in dermatology have not been systematically assessed. The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) has collected a huge number of questionnaires related to sessions' and speakers' evaluation over the years. The critical analysis of satisfaction's score is important and helpful for continuous improvement of the scientific programming. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that positively or negatively affect sessions' and speakers' scoring in the largest European congress of dermatology. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all sessions' evaluation forms collected between 2009 and 2015 during seven consecutive EADV congresses. A predictive model for sessions' and another for speakers' score evaluation were built based on multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 4964 speakers and 1022 sessions were evaluated. Topics more positively associated with total sessions' scoring were as follows: dermoscopy, neutrophilic diseases and hidradenitis suppurativa. Conversely, types of sessions which considerably negatively associated with total sessions' scoring included short thematic presentations and free communications. Furthermore, types of sessions which were more positively associated with high total speakers' scoring consisted of focus sessions and plenary lectures, whereas the most appreciated topics encompassed dermoscopy, screening programs, melanocytic naevi, panniculitis, organ transplanted and immunosuppressed patients, neutrophilic diseases, dermatopathology and history of dermatology. Finally, short thematic presentations, free communications and guidelines session showed overall poor scores. CONCLUSION: Focused and specialized topics are more prone to capture attention of participants when compared to sessions of heterogeneous content. Quite surprisingly, a practice-oriented topics such as guidelines, did not achieve a high score. Our findings provide new knowledge about components, which increase the level of satisfaction of participants and should facilitate the programming of attractive scientific congresses associated with increased training satisfaction.
CME CPD Committee European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Lugano Switzerland
Department of Dermatology Inselspital University Hospital University of Bern Bern Switzerland
European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Lugano Switzerland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012553
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190415134449.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/jdv.15178 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29992638
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Cazzaniga, S $u Department of Dermatology, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Centro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy.
- 245 10
- $a Factors influencing sessions' and speakers' evaluation: an analysis of seven consecutive European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology congress editions / $c S. Cazzaniga, L. Scerri, JP. Gabbud, P. Arenberger, L. Borradori, L. Naldi,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The variables affecting participants' satisfaction with a scientific conference in dermatology have not been systematically assessed. The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) has collected a huge number of questionnaires related to sessions' and speakers' evaluation over the years. The critical analysis of satisfaction's score is important and helpful for continuous improvement of the scientific programming. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that positively or negatively affect sessions' and speakers' scoring in the largest European congress of dermatology. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all sessions' evaluation forms collected between 2009 and 2015 during seven consecutive EADV congresses. A predictive model for sessions' and another for speakers' score evaluation were built based on multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 4964 speakers and 1022 sessions were evaluated. Topics more positively associated with total sessions' scoring were as follows: dermoscopy, neutrophilic diseases and hidradenitis suppurativa. Conversely, types of sessions which considerably negatively associated with total sessions' scoring included short thematic presentations and free communications. Furthermore, types of sessions which were more positively associated with high total speakers' scoring consisted of focus sessions and plenary lectures, whereas the most appreciated topics encompassed dermoscopy, screening programs, melanocytic naevi, panniculitis, organ transplanted and immunosuppressed patients, neutrophilic diseases, dermatopathology and history of dermatology. Finally, short thematic presentations, free communications and guidelines session showed overall poor scores. CONCLUSION: Focused and specialized topics are more prone to capture attention of participants when compared to sessions of heterogeneous content. Quite surprisingly, a practice-oriented topics such as guidelines, did not achieve a high score. Our findings provide new knowledge about components, which increase the level of satisfaction of participants and should facilitate the programming of attractive scientific congresses associated with increased training satisfaction.
- 650 _2
- $a biomedicínský výzkum $7 D035843
- 650 _2
- $a kongresy jako téma $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $x trendy $7 D003226
- 650 _2
- $a chování spotřebitelů $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003258
- 650 12
- $a dermatologie $7 D003880
- 650 _2
- $a kontinuální vzdělávání lékařů $x normy $7 D004502
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a společnosti lékařské $7 D012955
- 650 12
- $a venerologie $7 D014686
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Scerri, L $u CME-CPD Committee, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Lugano, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Gabbud, J P $u European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Lugano, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Arenberger, P $u CME-CPD Committee, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Lugano, Switzerland. Department of Dermatovenereology, Charles University 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Borradori, L $u Department of Dermatology, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Naldi, L $u Centro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy. Dermatology Unit, San Bortolo Hospital - Azienda ULSS8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002983 $t Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology JEADV $x 1468-3083 $g Roč. 32, č. 12 (2018), s. 2307-2313
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29992638 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190415134512 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391863 $s 1050858
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 32 $c 12 $d 2307-2313 $e 20180805 $i 1468-3083 $m Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology $n J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol $x MED00002983
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405