-
Something wrong with this record ?
Searching with and against each other: Spatiotemporal coordination of visual search behavior in collaborative and competitive settings
DC. Niehorster, T. Cornelissen, K. Holmqvist, I. Hooge,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1966
ProQuest Central
from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2009-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Competitive Behavior physiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Reward MeSH
- Eye Movements physiology MeSH
- Reaction Time MeSH
- Social Behavior * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Although in real life people frequently perform visual search together, in lab experiments this social dimension is typically left out. Here, we investigate individual, collaborative and competitive visual search with visualization of search partners' gaze. Participants were instructed to search a grid of Gabor patches while being eye tracked. For collaboration and competition, searchers were shown in real time at which element the paired searcher was looking. To promote collaboration or competition, points were rewarded or deducted for correct or incorrect answers. Early in collaboration trials, searchers rarely fixated the same elements. Reaction times of couples were roughly halved compared with individual search, although error rates did not increase. This indicates searchers formed an efficient collaboration strategy. Overlap, the proportion of dwells that landed on hexagons that the other searcher had already looked at, was lower than expected from simulated overlap of two searchers who are blind to the behavior of their partner. The proportion of overlapping dwells correlated positively with ratings of the quality of collaboration. During competition, overlap increased earlier in time, indicating that competitors divided space less efficiently. Analysis of the entropy of the dwell locations and scan paths revealed that in the competition condition, a less fixed looking pattern was exhibited than in the collaborate and individual search conditions. We conclude that participants can efficiently search together when provided only with information about their partner's gaze position by dividing up the search space. Competing search exhibited more random gaze patterns, potentially reflecting increased interaction between searchers in this condition.
Experimental Psychology Helmholtz Institute Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Scene Grammar Lab Department of Cognitive Psychology Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19027950
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190816100525.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3758/s13414-018-01640-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30593653
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Niehorster, Diederick C $u Lund University Humanities Lab, Lund University, Box 201, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden. diederick_c.niehorster@humlab.lu.se. Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. diederick_c.niehorster@humlab.lu.se.
- 245 10
- $a Searching with and against each other: Spatiotemporal coordination of visual search behavior in collaborative and competitive settings / $c DC. Niehorster, T. Cornelissen, K. Holmqvist, I. Hooge,
- 520 9_
- $a Although in real life people frequently perform visual search together, in lab experiments this social dimension is typically left out. Here, we investigate individual, collaborative and competitive visual search with visualization of search partners' gaze. Participants were instructed to search a grid of Gabor patches while being eye tracked. For collaboration and competition, searchers were shown in real time at which element the paired searcher was looking. To promote collaboration or competition, points were rewarded or deducted for correct or incorrect answers. Early in collaboration trials, searchers rarely fixated the same elements. Reaction times of couples were roughly halved compared with individual search, although error rates did not increase. This indicates searchers formed an efficient collaboration strategy. Overlap, the proportion of dwells that landed on hexagons that the other searcher had already looked at, was lower than expected from simulated overlap of two searchers who are blind to the behavior of their partner. The proportion of overlapping dwells correlated positively with ratings of the quality of collaboration. During competition, overlap increased earlier in time, indicating that competitors divided space less efficiently. Analysis of the entropy of the dwell locations and scan paths revealed that in the competition condition, a less fixed looking pattern was exhibited than in the collaborate and individual search conditions. We conclude that participants can efficiently search together when provided only with information about their partner's gaze position by dividing up the search space. Competing search exhibited more random gaze patterns, potentially reflecting increased interaction between searchers in this condition.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a kompetitivní chování $x fyziologie $7 D003163
- 650 _2
- $a pohyby očí $x fyziologie $7 D005133
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a reakční čas $7 D011930
- 650 _2
- $a odměna $7 D012201
- 650 12
- $a sociální chování $7 D012919
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Cornelissen, Tim $u Scene Grammar Lab, Department of Cognitive Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Holmqvist, Kenneth $u Department of Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany. Department of Psychology, Torun University, Toruń, Poland. Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hooge, Ignace $u Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00172775 $t Attention, perception & psychophysics $x 1943-393X $g Roč. 81, č. 3 (2019), s. 666-683
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30593653 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190816100754 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1433099 $s 1066410
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 81 $c 3 $d 666-683 $e - $i 1943-393X $m Attention, perception & psychophysics $n Atten Percept Psychophys $x MED00172775
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813