Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Searching with and against each other: Spatiotemporal coordination of visual search behavior in collaborative and competitive settings

DC. Niehorster, T. Cornelissen, K. Holmqvist, I. Hooge,

. 2019 ; 81 (3) : 666-683. [pub] -

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK Free Medical Journals from 1966
ProQuest Central from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2009-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest) from 2011-01-01 to 1 year ago

Although in real life people frequently perform visual search together, in lab experiments this social dimension is typically left out. Here, we investigate individual, collaborative and competitive visual search with visualization of search partners' gaze. Participants were instructed to search a grid of Gabor patches while being eye tracked. For collaboration and competition, searchers were shown in real time at which element the paired searcher was looking. To promote collaboration or competition, points were rewarded or deducted for correct or incorrect answers. Early in collaboration trials, searchers rarely fixated the same elements. Reaction times of couples were roughly halved compared with individual search, although error rates did not increase. This indicates searchers formed an efficient collaboration strategy. Overlap, the proportion of dwells that landed on hexagons that the other searcher had already looked at, was lower than expected from simulated overlap of two searchers who are blind to the behavior of their partner. The proportion of overlapping dwells correlated positively with ratings of the quality of collaboration. During competition, overlap increased earlier in time, indicating that competitors divided space less efficiently. Analysis of the entropy of the dwell locations and scan paths revealed that in the competition condition, a less fixed looking pattern was exhibited than in the collaborate and individual search conditions. We conclude that participants can efficiently search together when provided only with information about their partner's gaze position by dividing up the search space. Competing search exhibited more random gaze patterns, potentially reflecting increased interaction between searchers in this condition.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19027950
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190816100525.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3758/s13414-018-01640-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30593653
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Niehorster, Diederick C $u Lund University Humanities Lab, Lund University, Box 201, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden. diederick_c.niehorster@humlab.lu.se. Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. diederick_c.niehorster@humlab.lu.se.
245    10
$a Searching with and against each other: Spatiotemporal coordination of visual search behavior in collaborative and competitive settings / $c DC. Niehorster, T. Cornelissen, K. Holmqvist, I. Hooge,
520    9_
$a Although in real life people frequently perform visual search together, in lab experiments this social dimension is typically left out. Here, we investigate individual, collaborative and competitive visual search with visualization of search partners' gaze. Participants were instructed to search a grid of Gabor patches while being eye tracked. For collaboration and competition, searchers were shown in real time at which element the paired searcher was looking. To promote collaboration or competition, points were rewarded or deducted for correct or incorrect answers. Early in collaboration trials, searchers rarely fixated the same elements. Reaction times of couples were roughly halved compared with individual search, although error rates did not increase. This indicates searchers formed an efficient collaboration strategy. Overlap, the proportion of dwells that landed on hexagons that the other searcher had already looked at, was lower than expected from simulated overlap of two searchers who are blind to the behavior of their partner. The proportion of overlapping dwells correlated positively with ratings of the quality of collaboration. During competition, overlap increased earlier in time, indicating that competitors divided space less efficiently. Analysis of the entropy of the dwell locations and scan paths revealed that in the competition condition, a less fixed looking pattern was exhibited than in the collaborate and individual search conditions. We conclude that participants can efficiently search together when provided only with information about their partner's gaze position by dividing up the search space. Competing search exhibited more random gaze patterns, potentially reflecting increased interaction between searchers in this condition.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a kompetitivní chování $x fyziologie $7 D003163
650    _2
$a pohyby očí $x fyziologie $7 D005133
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a reakční čas $7 D011930
650    _2
$a odměna $7 D012201
650    12
$a sociální chování $7 D012919
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cornelissen, Tim $u Scene Grammar Lab, Department of Cognitive Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Holmqvist, Kenneth $u Department of Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany. Department of Psychology, Torun University, Toruń, Poland. Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hooge, Ignace $u Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
773    0_
$w MED00172775 $t Attention, perception & psychophysics $x 1943-393X $g Roč. 81, č. 3 (2019), s. 666-683
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30593653 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190816100754 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433099 $s 1066410
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 81 $c 3 $d 666-683 $e - $i 1943-393X $m Attention, perception & psychophysics $n Atten Percept Psychophys $x MED00172775
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...