-
Something wrong with this record ?
When is a "cryptic" species not a cryptic species: A consideration from the Holarctic micro-landsnail genus Euconulus (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora)
V. Horsáková, JC. Nekola, M. Horsák,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Principal Component Analysis MeSH
- Cell Nucleus genetics MeSH
- Phylogeny MeSH
- Snails classification genetics MeSH
- Likelihood Functions MeSH
- Electron Transport Complex IV classification genetics MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S classification genetics MeSH
- Base Sequence MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, DNA MeSH
- Sequence Alignment MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Naive use of molecular data may lead to ambiguous conclusions, especially within the context of "cryptic" species. Here, we integrated molecular and morphometric data to evaluate phylogenetic relationships in the widespread terrestrial micro-snail genus, Euconulus. We analyzed mitochondrial (16S + COII) and nuclear (ITS1 + ITS2) sequence across 94 populations from Europe, Asia and North America within the nominate species E. alderi, E. fulvus and E. polygyratus, and used the southeastern USA E. chersinus, E. dentatus, and E. trochulus as comparative outgroups. Phylogeny was reconstructed using four different reconstruction methods to identify robust, well-supported topological features. We then performed discriminant analysis on shell measurements between these genetically-identified species-level clades. These analyses provided evidence for a biologically valid North American "cryptic" species within E. alderi. However, while highly supported polyphyletic structure was also observed within E. fulvus, disagreement in placement of individuals between mtDNA and nDNA clades, lack of morphological differences, and presence of potential hybrids imply that these lineages do not rise to the threshold as biologically valid cryptic species, and rather appear to simply represent a complex of geographically structured populations within a single species. These results caution that entering into a cryptic species hypothesis should not be undertaken lightly, and should be optimally supported along multiple lines of evidence. Generally, post-hoc analyses of macro-scale features should be conducted to attempt identification of previously ignored diagnostic traits. If such traits cannot be found, i.e. in the case of potentially "fully cryptic" species, additional criteria should be met to propound a cryptic species hypothesis, including the agreement in tree topology among both mtDNA and nDNA, and little (or no) evidence of hybridization based on a critical analysis of sequence chromatograms. Even when the above conditions are satisfied, it only implies that the cryptic species hypothesis is plausible, but should optimally be subjected to further careful examination.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19027990
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190815112033.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.12.004 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30550963
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Horsáková, Veronika $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: veronika.horsakova@seznam.cz.
- 245 10
- $a When is a "cryptic" species not a cryptic species: A consideration from the Holarctic micro-landsnail genus Euconulus (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora) / $c V. Horsáková, JC. Nekola, M. Horsák,
- 520 9_
- $a Naive use of molecular data may lead to ambiguous conclusions, especially within the context of "cryptic" species. Here, we integrated molecular and morphometric data to evaluate phylogenetic relationships in the widespread terrestrial micro-snail genus, Euconulus. We analyzed mitochondrial (16S + COII) and nuclear (ITS1 + ITS2) sequence across 94 populations from Europe, Asia and North America within the nominate species E. alderi, E. fulvus and E. polygyratus, and used the southeastern USA E. chersinus, E. dentatus, and E. trochulus as comparative outgroups. Phylogeny was reconstructed using four different reconstruction methods to identify robust, well-supported topological features. We then performed discriminant analysis on shell measurements between these genetically-identified species-level clades. These analyses provided evidence for a biologically valid North American "cryptic" species within E. alderi. However, while highly supported polyphyletic structure was also observed within E. fulvus, disagreement in placement of individuals between mtDNA and nDNA clades, lack of morphological differences, and presence of potential hybrids imply that these lineages do not rise to the threshold as biologically valid cryptic species, and rather appear to simply represent a complex of geographically structured populations within a single species. These results caution that entering into a cryptic species hypothesis should not be undertaken lightly, and should be optimally supported along multiple lines of evidence. Generally, post-hoc analyses of macro-scale features should be conducted to attempt identification of previously ignored diagnostic traits. If such traits cannot be found, i.e. in the case of potentially "fully cryptic" species, additional criteria should be met to propound a cryptic species hypothesis, including the agreement in tree topology among both mtDNA and nDNA, and little (or no) evidence of hybridization based on a critical analysis of sequence chromatograms. Even when the above conditions are satisfied, it only implies that the cryptic species hypothesis is plausible, but should optimally be subjected to further careful examination.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a sekvence nukleotidů $7 D001483
- 650 _2
- $a buněčné jádro $x genetika $7 D002467
- 650 _2
- $a respirační komplex IV $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D003576
- 650 _2
- $a pravděpodobnostní funkce $7 D016013
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a analýza hlavních komponent $7 D025341
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 16S $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D012336
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční seřazení $7 D016415
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
- 650 _2
- $a hlemýždi $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D012908
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Nekola, Jeffrey C $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jnekola@unm.edu.
- 700 1_
- $a Horsák, Michal $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: horsak@sci.muni.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006574 $t Molecular phylogenetics and evolution $x 1095-9513 $g Roč. 132, č. - (2019), s. 307-320
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30550963 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190815112301 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1433139 $s 1066450
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 132 $c - $d 307-320 $e 20181211 $i 1095-9513 $m Molecular phylogenetics and evolution $n Mol Phylogenet Evol $x MED00006574
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813