• Something wrong with this record ?

When is a "cryptic" species not a cryptic species: A consideration from the Holarctic micro-landsnail genus Euconulus (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora)

V. Horsáková, JC. Nekola, M. Horsák,

. 2019 ; 132 (-) : 307-320. [pub] 20181211

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Naive use of molecular data may lead to ambiguous conclusions, especially within the context of "cryptic" species. Here, we integrated molecular and morphometric data to evaluate phylogenetic relationships in the widespread terrestrial micro-snail genus, Euconulus. We analyzed mitochondrial (16S + COII) and nuclear (ITS1 + ITS2) sequence across 94 populations from Europe, Asia and North America within the nominate species E. alderi, E. fulvus and E. polygyratus, and used the southeastern USA E. chersinus, E. dentatus, and E. trochulus as comparative outgroups. Phylogeny was reconstructed using four different reconstruction methods to identify robust, well-supported topological features. We then performed discriminant analysis on shell measurements between these genetically-identified species-level clades. These analyses provided evidence for a biologically valid North American "cryptic" species within E. alderi. However, while highly supported polyphyletic structure was also observed within E. fulvus, disagreement in placement of individuals between mtDNA and nDNA clades, lack of morphological differences, and presence of potential hybrids imply that these lineages do not rise to the threshold as biologically valid cryptic species, and rather appear to simply represent a complex of geographically structured populations within a single species. These results caution that entering into a cryptic species hypothesis should not be undertaken lightly, and should be optimally supported along multiple lines of evidence. Generally, post-hoc analyses of macro-scale features should be conducted to attempt identification of previously ignored diagnostic traits. If such traits cannot be found, i.e. in the case of potentially "fully cryptic" species, additional criteria should be met to propound a cryptic species hypothesis, including the agreement in tree topology among both mtDNA and nDNA, and little (or no) evidence of hybridization based on a critical analysis of sequence chromatograms. Even when the above conditions are satisfied, it only implies that the cryptic species hypothesis is plausible, but should optimally be subjected to further careful examination.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19027990
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190815112033.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.12.004 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30550963
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Horsáková, Veronika $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: veronika.horsakova@seznam.cz.
245    10
$a When is a "cryptic" species not a cryptic species: A consideration from the Holarctic micro-landsnail genus Euconulus (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora) / $c V. Horsáková, JC. Nekola, M. Horsák,
520    9_
$a Naive use of molecular data may lead to ambiguous conclusions, especially within the context of "cryptic" species. Here, we integrated molecular and morphometric data to evaluate phylogenetic relationships in the widespread terrestrial micro-snail genus, Euconulus. We analyzed mitochondrial (16S + COII) and nuclear (ITS1 + ITS2) sequence across 94 populations from Europe, Asia and North America within the nominate species E. alderi, E. fulvus and E. polygyratus, and used the southeastern USA E. chersinus, E. dentatus, and E. trochulus as comparative outgroups. Phylogeny was reconstructed using four different reconstruction methods to identify robust, well-supported topological features. We then performed discriminant analysis on shell measurements between these genetically-identified species-level clades. These analyses provided evidence for a biologically valid North American "cryptic" species within E. alderi. However, while highly supported polyphyletic structure was also observed within E. fulvus, disagreement in placement of individuals between mtDNA and nDNA clades, lack of morphological differences, and presence of potential hybrids imply that these lineages do not rise to the threshold as biologically valid cryptic species, and rather appear to simply represent a complex of geographically structured populations within a single species. These results caution that entering into a cryptic species hypothesis should not be undertaken lightly, and should be optimally supported along multiple lines of evidence. Generally, post-hoc analyses of macro-scale features should be conducted to attempt identification of previously ignored diagnostic traits. If such traits cannot be found, i.e. in the case of potentially "fully cryptic" species, additional criteria should be met to propound a cryptic species hypothesis, including the agreement in tree topology among both mtDNA and nDNA, and little (or no) evidence of hybridization based on a critical analysis of sequence chromatograms. Even when the above conditions are satisfied, it only implies that the cryptic species hypothesis is plausible, but should optimally be subjected to further careful examination.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a sekvence nukleotidů $7 D001483
650    _2
$a buněčné jádro $x genetika $7 D002467
650    _2
$a respirační komplex IV $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D003576
650    _2
$a pravděpodobnostní funkce $7 D016013
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a analýza hlavních komponent $7 D025341
650    _2
$a RNA ribozomální 16S $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D012336
650    _2
$a sekvenční seřazení $7 D016415
650    _2
$a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
650    _2
$a hlemýždi $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D012908
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Nekola, Jeffrey C $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jnekola@unm.edu.
700    1_
$a Horsák, Michal $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: horsak@sci.muni.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00006574 $t Molecular phylogenetics and evolution $x 1095-9513 $g Roč. 132, č. - (2019), s. 307-320
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30550963 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190815112301 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433139 $s 1066450
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 132 $c - $d 307-320 $e 20181211 $i 1095-9513 $m Molecular phylogenetics and evolution $n Mol Phylogenet Evol $x MED00006574
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...