Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Windbreak Efficiency in Agricultural Landscape of the Central Europe: Multiple Approaches to Wind Erosion Control

Z. Vacek, D. Řeháček, J. Cukor, S. Vacek, T. Khel, RP. Sharma, J. Kučera, J. Král, V. Papaj,

. 2018 ; 62 (5) : 942-954. [pub] 20180824

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago

Windbreak is one of the key factors for making the agriculture systems successful through reduced wind erosion, improved microclimate, increased biodiversity, and production potentiality of timber and agricultural crops. Even though windbreak occupies only a small part of agricultural landscape, its advantages on the ecological and economical perspective are quite high. This study evaluated the effects of three windbreak types on the wind erosion control in relation to their structural diversities, wind-speed reduction, and optical porosities in the central part of the Czech Republic. Diversity in the windbreak was evaluated based on its species diversity, vertical structure, spatial pattern, and complexities. Wind speed was measured at the different distances on the leeward side of the windbreak and one station placed on the windward side as a control. Windbreak characteristics were described by terrestrial photogrammetry method using the values of optical porosity. The timber volume of the windbreaks with rich biodiversity species ranged from 224 to 443 m3 ha-1height of the windbreak on the. Results of the windbreak efficiency showed significantly closer relationship between optical porosity and structural indices. The optical porosity significantly correlated with wind-speed reduction, especially in the lower part of the windbreak. A significant dependency of the windbreak efficiency on the tree dominant height was also observed for each windbreak type. The most significant effect on the wind-speed reduction in terms of structural indices had total diversity index and Arten-profile index describing vertical structures, which are recommended together with the optical porosity to evaluate the windbreak efficiency in controlling wind erosion.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028254
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190820100634.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00267-018-1090-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30143821
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Vacek, Zdeněk $u Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic. vacekz@fld.czu.cz.
245    10
$a Windbreak Efficiency in Agricultural Landscape of the Central Europe: Multiple Approaches to Wind Erosion Control / $c Z. Vacek, D. Řeháček, J. Cukor, S. Vacek, T. Khel, RP. Sharma, J. Kučera, J. Král, V. Papaj,
520    9_
$a Windbreak is one of the key factors for making the agriculture systems successful through reduced wind erosion, improved microclimate, increased biodiversity, and production potentiality of timber and agricultural crops. Even though windbreak occupies only a small part of agricultural landscape, its advantages on the ecological and economical perspective are quite high. This study evaluated the effects of three windbreak types on the wind erosion control in relation to their structural diversities, wind-speed reduction, and optical porosities in the central part of the Czech Republic. Diversity in the windbreak was evaluated based on its species diversity, vertical structure, spatial pattern, and complexities. Wind speed was measured at the different distances on the leeward side of the windbreak and one station placed on the windward side as a control. Windbreak characteristics were described by terrestrial photogrammetry method using the values of optical porosity. The timber volume of the windbreaks with rich biodiversity species ranged from 224 to 443 m3 ha-1height of the windbreak on the. Results of the windbreak efficiency showed significantly closer relationship between optical porosity and structural indices. The optical porosity significantly correlated with wind-speed reduction, especially in the lower part of the windbreak. A significant dependency of the windbreak efficiency on the tree dominant height was also observed for each windbreak type. The most significant effect on the wind-speed reduction in terms of structural indices had total diversity index and Arten-profile index describing vertical structures, which are recommended together with the optical porosity to evaluate the windbreak efficiency in controlling wind erosion.
650    _2
$a zemědělství $x metody $7 D000383
650    _2
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $x metody $7 D003247
650    _2
$a ekologie $7 D004463
650    _2
$a stromy $x růst a vývoj $7 D014197
650    12
$a vítr $7 D014919
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Řeháček, David $u Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Žabovřeská 250, 156 27, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cukor, Jan $u Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vacek, Stanislav $u Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Khel, Tomáš $u Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Žabovřeská 250, 156 27, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sharma, Ram P $u Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kučera, Josef $u Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Žabovřeská 250, 156 27, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Král, Jan $u Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Papaj, Vladimír $u Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Žabovřeská 250, 156 27, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00005740 $t Environmental management $x 1432-1009 $g Roč. 62, č. 5 (2018), s. 942-954
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30143821 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190820100910 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433403 $s 1066714
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 62 $c 5 $d 942-954 $e 20180824 $i 1432-1009 $m Environmental management $n Environ Manage $x MED00005740
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...