Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Stool Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Community Recovery

K. Fiedorová, M. Radvanský, E. Němcová, H. Grombiříková, J. Bosák, M. Černochová, M. Lexa, D. Šmajs, T. Freiberger,

. 2019 ; 10 (-) : 821. [pub] 20190417

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19029039

Our understanding of human gut microbiota in health and disease depends on accurate and reproducible microbial data acquisition. The critical step in this process is to apply an appropriate methodology to extract microbial DNA, since biases introduced during the DNA extraction process may result in inaccurate microbial representation. In this study, we attempted to find a DNA extraction protocol which could be effectively used to analyze both the bacterial and fungal community. We evaluated the effect of five DNA extraction methods (QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, PureLinkTM Microbiome DNA Purification Kit, ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrepTM Kit, NucleoSpin® DNA Stool Kit, and IHMS protocol Q) on bacterial and fungal gut microbiome recovery using (i) a defined system of germ-free mice feces spiked with bacterial or fungal strains, and (ii) non-spiked human feces. In our experimental setup, we confirmed that the examined methods significantly differed in efficiency and quality, which affected the identified stool microbiome composition. In addition, our results indicated that fungal DNA extraction might be prone to be affected by reagent/kit contamination, and thus an appropriate blank control should be included in mycobiome research. Overall, standardized IHMS protocol Q, recommended by the International Human Microbiome Consortium, performed the best when considering all the parameters analyzed, and thus could be applied not only in bacterial, but also in fungal microbiome research.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19029039
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210309104825.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2019 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00821 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31057522
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Fiedorová, Kristýna $u Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czechia. Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
245    14
$a The Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Stool Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Community Recovery / $c K. Fiedorová, M. Radvanský, E. Němcová, H. Grombiříková, J. Bosák, M. Černochová, M. Lexa, D. Šmajs, T. Freiberger,
520    9_
$a Our understanding of human gut microbiota in health and disease depends on accurate and reproducible microbial data acquisition. The critical step in this process is to apply an appropriate methodology to extract microbial DNA, since biases introduced during the DNA extraction process may result in inaccurate microbial representation. In this study, we attempted to find a DNA extraction protocol which could be effectively used to analyze both the bacterial and fungal community. We evaluated the effect of five DNA extraction methods (QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, PureLinkTM Microbiome DNA Purification Kit, ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrepTM Kit, NucleoSpin® DNA Stool Kit, and IHMS protocol Q) on bacterial and fungal gut microbiome recovery using (i) a defined system of germ-free mice feces spiked with bacterial or fungal strains, and (ii) non-spiked human feces. In our experimental setup, we confirmed that the examined methods significantly differed in efficiency and quality, which affected the identified stool microbiome composition. In addition, our results indicated that fungal DNA extraction might be prone to be affected by reagent/kit contamination, and thus an appropriate blank control should be included in mycobiome research. Overall, standardized IHMS protocol Q, recommended by the International Human Microbiome Consortium, performed the best when considering all the parameters analyzed, and thus could be applied not only in bacterial, but also in fungal microbiome research.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Radvanský, Matěj $u Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Němcová, Eva $u Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Grombiříková, Hana $u Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Bosák, Juraj $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Černochová, Michaela $u Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Lexa, Matej $u Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Šmajs, David $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Freiberger, Tomáš $u Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czechia. Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
773    0_
$w MED00181714 $t Frontiers in microbiology $x 1664-302X $g Roč. 10, č. - (2019), s. 821
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31057522 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210309104820 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1434188 $s 1067499
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 10 $c - $d 821 $e 20190417 $i 1664-302X $m Frontiers in microbiology $n Front Microbiol $x MED00181714
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace