-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Professional guideline versus product label selection for treatment with IV thrombolysis: An analysis from SITS registry
AC. Cameron, J. Bogie, AH. Abdul-Rahim, N. Ahmed, M. Mazya, R. Mikulik, W. Hacke, KR. Lees, Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) Investigators,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
31008336
DOI
10.1177/2396987317747737
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Introduction: Thrombolysis usage in ischaemic stroke varies across sites. Divergent advice from professional guidelines and product labels may contribute. Patients and methods: We analysed SITS-International registry patients enrolled January 2010 through June 2016. We grouped sites into organisational tertiles by number of patients arriving ≤2.5 h and treated ≤3 h, percentage arriving ≤2.5 h and treated ≤3 h, and numbers treated ≤3 h. We assigned scores of 1-3 (lower/middle/upper) per variable and 2 for onsite thrombectomy. We classified sites as lower efficiency (summed scores 3-5), medium efficiency (6-8) or higher efficiency (9-11). Sites were also grouped by adherence with European product label and ESO guideline: 'label adherent' (>95% on-label), 'guideline adherent' (≥5% off-label, ≥95% on-guideline) or 'guideline non-adherent' (>5% off-guideline). We cross-tabulated site-efficiency and adherence. We estimated the potential benefit of universally selecting by ESO guidance, using onset-to-treatment time-specific numbers needed to treat for day 90 mRS 0-1. Results: A total of 56,689 patients at 597 sites were included: 163 sites were higher efficiency, 204 medium efficiency and 230 lower efficiency. Fifty-six sites were 'label adherent', 204 'guideline adherent' and 337 'guideline non-adherent'. There were strong associations between site-efficiency and adherence (P < 0.001). Almost all 'label adherent' sites (55, 98%) were lower efficiency. If all patients were treated by ESO guidelines, an additional 17,031 would receive alteplase, which translates into 1922 more patients with favourable three-month outcomes. Discussion: Adherence with product labels is highest in lower efficiency sites. Closer alignment with professional guidelines would increase patients treated and favourable outcomes. Conclusion: Product labels should be revised to allow treatment of patients ≤4.5 h from onset and aged ≥80 years.
Department of Neurology University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19029108
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190815105331.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/2396987317747737 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31008336
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Cameron, Alan C $u 1Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
- 245 10
- $a Professional guideline versus product label selection for treatment with IV thrombolysis: An analysis from SITS registry / $c AC. Cameron, J. Bogie, AH. Abdul-Rahim, N. Ahmed, M. Mazya, R. Mikulik, W. Hacke, KR. Lees, Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) Investigators,
- 520 9_
- $a Introduction: Thrombolysis usage in ischaemic stroke varies across sites. Divergent advice from professional guidelines and product labels may contribute. Patients and methods: We analysed SITS-International registry patients enrolled January 2010 through June 2016. We grouped sites into organisational tertiles by number of patients arriving ≤2.5 h and treated ≤3 h, percentage arriving ≤2.5 h and treated ≤3 h, and numbers treated ≤3 h. We assigned scores of 1-3 (lower/middle/upper) per variable and 2 for onsite thrombectomy. We classified sites as lower efficiency (summed scores 3-5), medium efficiency (6-8) or higher efficiency (9-11). Sites were also grouped by adherence with European product label and ESO guideline: 'label adherent' (>95% on-label), 'guideline adherent' (≥5% off-label, ≥95% on-guideline) or 'guideline non-adherent' (>5% off-guideline). We cross-tabulated site-efficiency and adherence. We estimated the potential benefit of universally selecting by ESO guidance, using onset-to-treatment time-specific numbers needed to treat for day 90 mRS 0-1. Results: A total of 56,689 patients at 597 sites were included: 163 sites were higher efficiency, 204 medium efficiency and 230 lower efficiency. Fifty-six sites were 'label adherent', 204 'guideline adherent' and 337 'guideline non-adherent'. There were strong associations between site-efficiency and adherence (P < 0.001). Almost all 'label adherent' sites (55, 98%) were lower efficiency. If all patients were treated by ESO guidelines, an additional 17,031 would receive alteplase, which translates into 1922 more patients with favourable three-month outcomes. Discussion: Adherence with product labels is highest in lower efficiency sites. Closer alignment with professional guidelines would increase patients treated and favourable outcomes. Conclusion: Product labels should be revised to allow treatment of patients ≤4.5 h from onset and aged ≥80 years.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bogie, James $u 1Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Abdul-Rahim, Azmil H $u 2Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Ahmed, Niaz $u 3Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 700 1_
- $a Mazya, Michael $u 3Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 700 1_
- $a Mikulik, Robert $u International Clinical Research Centre, Neurology Department, St Anne's Hospital and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hacke, Werner $u Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Lees, Kennedy R $u 1Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
- 710 2_
- $a Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) Investigators
- 773 0_
- $w MED00200144 $t European stroke journal $x 2396-9881 $g Roč. 3, č. 1 (2018), s. 39-46
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31008336 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190815105559 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1434257 $s 1067568
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 3 $c 1 $d 39-46 $e 20171208 $i 2396-9881 $m European stroke journal $n Eur Stroke J $x MED00200144
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813