Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Professional guideline versus product label selection for treatment with IV thrombolysis: An analysis from SITS registry

AC. Cameron, J. Bogie, AH. Abdul-Rahim, N. Ahmed, M. Mazya, R. Mikulik, W. Hacke, KR. Lees, Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) Investigators,

. 2018 ; 3 (1) : 39-46. [pub] 20171208

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19029108

Introduction: Thrombolysis usage in ischaemic stroke varies across sites. Divergent advice from professional guidelines and product labels may contribute. Patients and methods: We analysed SITS-International registry patients enrolled January 2010 through June 2016. We grouped sites into organisational tertiles by number of patients arriving ≤2.5 h and treated ≤3 h, percentage arriving ≤2.5 h and treated ≤3 h, and numbers treated ≤3 h. We assigned scores of 1-3 (lower/middle/upper) per variable and 2 for onsite thrombectomy. We classified sites as lower efficiency (summed scores 3-5), medium efficiency (6-8) or higher efficiency (9-11). Sites were also grouped by adherence with European product label and ESO guideline: 'label adherent' (>95% on-label), 'guideline adherent' (≥5% off-label, ≥95% on-guideline) or 'guideline non-adherent' (>5% off-guideline). We cross-tabulated site-efficiency and adherence. We estimated the potential benefit of universally selecting by ESO guidance, using onset-to-treatment time-specific numbers needed to treat for day 90 mRS 0-1. Results: A total of 56,689 patients at 597 sites were included: 163 sites were higher efficiency, 204 medium efficiency and 230 lower efficiency. Fifty-six sites were 'label adherent', 204 'guideline adherent' and 337 'guideline non-adherent'. There were strong associations between site-efficiency and adherence (P < 0.001). Almost all 'label adherent' sites (55, 98%) were lower efficiency. If all patients were treated by ESO guidelines, an additional 17,031 would receive alteplase, which translates into 1922 more patients with favourable three-month outcomes. Discussion: Adherence with product labels is highest in lower efficiency sites. Closer alignment with professional guidelines would increase patients treated and favourable outcomes. Conclusion: Product labels should be revised to allow treatment of patients ≤4.5 h from onset and aged ≥80 years.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19029108
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190815105331.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/2396987317747737 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31008336
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Cameron, Alan C $u 1Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
245    10
$a Professional guideline versus product label selection for treatment with IV thrombolysis: An analysis from SITS registry / $c AC. Cameron, J. Bogie, AH. Abdul-Rahim, N. Ahmed, M. Mazya, R. Mikulik, W. Hacke, KR. Lees, Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) Investigators,
520    9_
$a Introduction: Thrombolysis usage in ischaemic stroke varies across sites. Divergent advice from professional guidelines and product labels may contribute. Patients and methods: We analysed SITS-International registry patients enrolled January 2010 through June 2016. We grouped sites into organisational tertiles by number of patients arriving ≤2.5 h and treated ≤3 h, percentage arriving ≤2.5 h and treated ≤3 h, and numbers treated ≤3 h. We assigned scores of 1-3 (lower/middle/upper) per variable and 2 for onsite thrombectomy. We classified sites as lower efficiency (summed scores 3-5), medium efficiency (6-8) or higher efficiency (9-11). Sites were also grouped by adherence with European product label and ESO guideline: 'label adherent' (>95% on-label), 'guideline adherent' (≥5% off-label, ≥95% on-guideline) or 'guideline non-adherent' (>5% off-guideline). We cross-tabulated site-efficiency and adherence. We estimated the potential benefit of universally selecting by ESO guidance, using onset-to-treatment time-specific numbers needed to treat for day 90 mRS 0-1. Results: A total of 56,689 patients at 597 sites were included: 163 sites were higher efficiency, 204 medium efficiency and 230 lower efficiency. Fifty-six sites were 'label adherent', 204 'guideline adherent' and 337 'guideline non-adherent'. There were strong associations between site-efficiency and adherence (P < 0.001). Almost all 'label adherent' sites (55, 98%) were lower efficiency. If all patients were treated by ESO guidelines, an additional 17,031 would receive alteplase, which translates into 1922 more patients with favourable three-month outcomes. Discussion: Adherence with product labels is highest in lower efficiency sites. Closer alignment with professional guidelines would increase patients treated and favourable outcomes. Conclusion: Product labels should be revised to allow treatment of patients ≤4.5 h from onset and aged ≥80 years.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bogie, James $u 1Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
700    1_
$a Abdul-Rahim, Azmil H $u 2Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
700    1_
$a Ahmed, Niaz $u 3Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Mazya, Michael $u 3Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Mikulik, Robert $u International Clinical Research Centre, Neurology Department, St Anne's Hospital and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hacke, Werner $u Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Lees, Kennedy R $u 1Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
710    2_
$a Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) Investigators
773    0_
$w MED00200144 $t European stroke journal $x 2396-9881 $g Roč. 3, č. 1 (2018), s. 39-46
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31008336 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190815105559 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1434257 $s 1067568
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 3 $c 1 $d 39-46 $e 20171208 $i 2396-9881 $m European stroke journal $n Eur Stroke J $x MED00200144
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...