Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Cognitive Profiles and Functional Connectivity in First-Episode Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders - Linking Behavioral and Neuronal Data

M. Rodriguez, Y. Zaytseva, A. Cvrčková, B. Dvořaček, A. Dorazilová, J. Jonáš, P. Šustová, V. Voráčková, M. Hájková, Z. Kratochvílová, F. Španiel, P. Mohr,

. 2019 ; 10 (-) : 689. [pub] 20190402

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
NV15-28998A MZ0 CEP Register

The character of cognitive deficit in schizophrenia is not clear due to the heterogeneity in research results. In heterogeneous conditions, the cluster solution allows the classification of individuals based on profiles. Our aim was to examine the cognitive profiles of first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder (FES) subjects based on cluster analysis, and to correlate these profiles with clinical variables and resting state brain connectivity, as measured with magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 67 FES subjects were assessed with a neuropsychological test battery and on clinical variables. The results of the cognitive domains were cluster analyzed. In addition, functional connectivity was calculated using ROI-to-ROI analysis with four groups: Three groups were defined based on the cluster analysis of cognitive performance and a control group with a normal cognitive performance. The connectivity was compared between the patient clusters and controls. We found different cognitive profiles based on three clusters: Cluster 1: decline in the attention, working memory/flexibility, and verbal memory domains. Cluster 2: decline in the verbal memory domain and above average performance in the attention domain. Cluster 3: generalized and severe deficit in all of the cognitive domains. FES diagnoses were distributed among all of the clusters. Cluster comparisons in neural connectivity also showed differences between the groups. Cluster 1 showed both hyperconnectivity between the cerebellum and precentral gyrus, the salience network (SN) (insula cortex), and fronto-parietal network (FPN) as well as between the PreCG and SN (insula cortex) and hypoconnectivity between the default mode network (DMN) and seeds of SN [insula and supramarginal gyrus (SMG)]; Cluster 2 showed hyperconnectivity between the DMN and cerebellum, SN (insula) and precentral gyrus, and FPN and IFG; Cluster 3 showed hypoconnectivity between the DMN and SN (insula) and SN (SMG) and pallidum. The cluster solution confirms the prevalence of a cognitive decline with different patterns of cognitive performance, and different levels of severity in FES. Moreover, separate behavioral cognitive subsets can be linked to patterns of brain functional connectivity.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19029121
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201030133256.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2019 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00689 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31001171
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Rodriguez Manchola, Rachel Virginia $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia. $7 xx0230299
245    10
$a Cognitive Profiles and Functional Connectivity in First-Episode Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders - Linking Behavioral and Neuronal Data / $c M. Rodriguez, Y. Zaytseva, A. Cvrčková, B. Dvořaček, A. Dorazilová, J. Jonáš, P. Šustová, V. Voráčková, M. Hájková, Z. Kratochvílová, F. Španiel, P. Mohr,
520    9_
$a The character of cognitive deficit in schizophrenia is not clear due to the heterogeneity in research results. In heterogeneous conditions, the cluster solution allows the classification of individuals based on profiles. Our aim was to examine the cognitive profiles of first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder (FES) subjects based on cluster analysis, and to correlate these profiles with clinical variables and resting state brain connectivity, as measured with magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 67 FES subjects were assessed with a neuropsychological test battery and on clinical variables. The results of the cognitive domains were cluster analyzed. In addition, functional connectivity was calculated using ROI-to-ROI analysis with four groups: Three groups were defined based on the cluster analysis of cognitive performance and a control group with a normal cognitive performance. The connectivity was compared between the patient clusters and controls. We found different cognitive profiles based on three clusters: Cluster 1: decline in the attention, working memory/flexibility, and verbal memory domains. Cluster 2: decline in the verbal memory domain and above average performance in the attention domain. Cluster 3: generalized and severe deficit in all of the cognitive domains. FES diagnoses were distributed among all of the clusters. Cluster comparisons in neural connectivity also showed differences between the groups. Cluster 1 showed both hyperconnectivity between the cerebellum and precentral gyrus, the salience network (SN) (insula cortex), and fronto-parietal network (FPN) as well as between the PreCG and SN (insula cortex) and hypoconnectivity between the default mode network (DMN) and seeds of SN [insula and supramarginal gyrus (SMG)]; Cluster 2 showed hyperconnectivity between the DMN and cerebellum, SN (insula) and precentral gyrus, and FPN and IFG; Cluster 3 showed hypoconnectivity between the DMN and SN (insula) and SN (SMG) and pallidum. The cluster solution confirms the prevalence of a cognitive decline with different patterns of cognitive performance, and different levels of severity in FES. Moreover, separate behavioral cognitive subsets can be linked to patterns of brain functional connectivity.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Zaytseva, Yuliya $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Cvrčková, Aneta $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Dvořaček, Boris $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Dorazilová, Aneta $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Jonáš, Juraj $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Šustová, Petra $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Voráčková, Veronika $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Hájková, Marie $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Kratochvílová, Zuzana $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Španiel, Filip $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Mohr, Pavel $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.
773    0_
$w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 10, č. - (2019), s. 689
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31001171 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201030133254 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1434270 $s 1067581
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 10 $c - $d 689 $e 20190402 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
GRA    __
$a NV15-28998A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...