-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Chinese Palaeolithic challenges for interpretations of palaeolithic archaeology
Ofer Bar-Yosef
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2001-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1987
The development of prehistoric studies in Europe and Western Asia has powerfully influenced the terminology and conceptual frameworks of Palaeolithic archaeology. However, attempts to impose these on archaeological records elsewhere, such as East Asia, risk seriously distorting interpretations of the material and a failure to appreciate its significance. In particular, the Chinese Palaeolithic record provides major contrasts with that of Europe and Western Asia, and challenges prevailing notions of hominins' cognitive and adaptative capabilities based primarily on the lithic analysis. Early hominins beyond Africa were not tied to savanna environments and were able to exploit a range of habitats as a result of the flexibility afforded them by social and cognitive developments. Similarly, cultural influences conserved stone technologies, so that there is no necessary link between tool forms, cognitive ability and habitat characteristics. However, study of tool reduction sequences provides insights into the learning processes underlying the production of particular assemblages. Core and flake industries persisted in China for much of the Pleistocene, and while hand axe assemblages are known from the south of the country, they differ from those found in Europe and Africa. Levallois and several other Middle Palaeolithic industries are generally absent, although some instances are known from western and northern areas of the country. Early (> 25 kya) microlithic industries occur in north China, with late cobble tool assemblages in the south, probably coincident with the extent of bamboo forests. South China also provides examples of pottery from Upper Palaeolithic contexts dating from < 20 kya. The implications of these distinctive aspects of the Chinese archaeological record for understanding past human behaviors are briefly discussed, as are some more general issues associated with modeling early human cognition.
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19030322
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191105130739.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190829s2015 xr bd f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Bar-Yosef, Ofer $u Department of Anthropology Harvard University Peabody Museum 11 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
- 245 10
- $a Chinese Palaeolithic challenges for interpretations of palaeolithic archaeology / $c Ofer Bar-Yosef
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a The development of prehistoric studies in Europe and Western Asia has powerfully influenced the terminology and conceptual frameworks of Palaeolithic archaeology. However, attempts to impose these on archaeological records elsewhere, such as East Asia, risk seriously distorting interpretations of the material and a failure to appreciate its significance. In particular, the Chinese Palaeolithic record provides major contrasts with that of Europe and Western Asia, and challenges prevailing notions of hominins' cognitive and adaptative capabilities based primarily on the lithic analysis. Early hominins beyond Africa were not tied to savanna environments and were able to exploit a range of habitats as a result of the flexibility afforded them by social and cognitive developments. Similarly, cultural influences conserved stone technologies, so that there is no necessary link between tool forms, cognitive ability and habitat characteristics. However, study of tool reduction sequences provides insights into the learning processes underlying the production of particular assemblages. Core and flake industries persisted in China for much of the Pleistocene, and while hand axe assemblages are known from the south of the country, they differ from those found in Europe and Africa. Levallois and several other Middle Palaeolithic industries are generally absent, although some instances are known from western and northern areas of the country. Early (> 25 kya) microlithic industries occur in north China, with late cobble tool assemblages in the south, probably coincident with the extent of bamboo forests. South China also provides examples of pottery from Upper Palaeolithic contexts dating from < 20 kya. The implications of these distinctive aspects of the Chinese archaeological record for understanding past human behaviors are briefly discussed, as are some more general issues associated with modeling early human cognition.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 773 0_
- $t Anthropologie $x 0323-1119 $g Roč. 53, č. 1-2 (2015), s. 77-92 $w MED00152805
- 856 41
- $u http://puvodni.mzm.cz/Anthropologie/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2372 $c 1278 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190828153002 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191105131009 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1438488 $s 1068807
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 53 $c 1-2 $d 77-92 $i 0323-1119 $m Anthropologie $x MED00152805
- LZP __
- $a NLK 2019-14/mk