Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Ventricular Electrical Delay Measured From Body Surface ECGs Is Associated With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response in Left Bundle Branch Block Patients From the MADIT-CRT Trial (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)

F. Plesinger, P. Jurak, J. Halamek, P. Nejedly, P. Leinveber, I. Viscor, V. Vondra, S. McNitt, B. Polonsky, AJ. Moss, W. Zareba, JP. Couderc,

. 2018 ; 11 (5) : e005719. [pub] 20180426

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block, 30% of these patients do not respond to the therapy. Identifying these patients before implantation of the device is one of the current challenges in clinical cardiology. METHODS: We verified the diagnostic contribution and an optimized computerized approach to measuring ventricular electrical activation delay (VED) from body surface 12-lead ECGs. We applied the method to ECGs acquired before implantation (baseline) in the MADIT-CRT trial (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). VED values were dichotomized using its quartiles, and we tested the association of VED values with the MADIT-CRT primary end point of heart failure or death. Multivariate Cox proportional models were used to estimate the risk of study end points. In addition, the association between VED values and hemodynamic changes after CRT-D implantation was examined using 1-year follow-up echocardiograms. RESULTS: Our results showed that left bundle branch block patients with baseline VED <31.2 ms had a 35% risk of MADIT-CRT end points, whereas patients with VED ≥31.2 ms had a 14% risk (P<0.001). The hazard ratio for predicting primary end points in patients with low VED was 2.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.53-3.57; P<0.001). Higher VED values were also associated with beneficial hemodynamic changes. These strong VED associations were not found in the right bundle branch block and intraventricular conduction delay cohorts of the MADIT-CRT trial. CONCLUSIONS: Left bundle branch block patients with a high baseline VED value benefited most from CRT, whereas left bundle branch block patients with low VED did not show CRT benefits.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035279
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191014095913.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005719 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29700054
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Plesinger, Filip $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Department of Medical Signals, Brno, (F.P., P.J., J.H., P.N., I.V., V.V.). fplesinger@isibrno.cz.
245    10
$a Ventricular Electrical Delay Measured From Body Surface ECGs Is Associated With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response in Left Bundle Branch Block Patients From the MADIT-CRT Trial (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) / $c F. Plesinger, P. Jurak, J. Halamek, P. Nejedly, P. Leinveber, I. Viscor, V. Vondra, S. McNitt, B. Polonsky, AJ. Moss, W. Zareba, JP. Couderc,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block, 30% of these patients do not respond to the therapy. Identifying these patients before implantation of the device is one of the current challenges in clinical cardiology. METHODS: We verified the diagnostic contribution and an optimized computerized approach to measuring ventricular electrical activation delay (VED) from body surface 12-lead ECGs. We applied the method to ECGs acquired before implantation (baseline) in the MADIT-CRT trial (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). VED values were dichotomized using its quartiles, and we tested the association of VED values with the MADIT-CRT primary end point of heart failure or death. Multivariate Cox proportional models were used to estimate the risk of study end points. In addition, the association between VED values and hemodynamic changes after CRT-D implantation was examined using 1-year follow-up echocardiograms. RESULTS: Our results showed that left bundle branch block patients with baseline VED <31.2 ms had a 35% risk of MADIT-CRT end points, whereas patients with VED ≥31.2 ms had a 14% risk (P<0.001). The hazard ratio for predicting primary end points in patients with low VED was 2.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.53-3.57; P<0.001). Higher VED values were also associated with beneficial hemodynamic changes. These strong VED associations were not found in the right bundle branch block and intraventricular conduction delay cohorts of the MADIT-CRT trial. CONCLUSIONS: Left bundle branch block patients with a high baseline VED value benefited most from CRT, whereas left bundle branch block patients with low VED did not show CRT benefits.
650    12
$a akční potenciály $7 D000200
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a blokáda Tawarova raménka $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D002037
650    12
$a srdeční resynchronizační terapie $x škodlivé účinky $x mortalita $7 D058406
650    _2
$a klinické rozhodování $7 D000066491
650    12
$a defibrilátory implantabilní $7 D017147
650    _2
$a elektrická defibrilace $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x mortalita $7 D004554
650    12
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a srdeční selhání $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D006333
650    _2
$a srdeční frekvence $7 D006339
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a multicentrické studie jako téma $7 D015337
650    _2
$a výběr pacientů $7 D018579
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
650    _2
$a obnova funkce $7 D020127
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Jurak, Pavel $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Department of Medical Signals, Brno, (F.P., P.J., J.H., P.N., I.V., V.V.).
700    1_
$a Halamek, Josef $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Department of Medical Signals, Brno, (F.P., P.J., J.H., P.N., I.V., V.V.).
700    1_
$a Nejedly, Petr $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Department of Medical Signals, Brno, (F.P., P.J., J.H., P.N., I.V., V.V.).
700    1_
$a Leinveber, Pavel $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (P.L.).
700    1_
$a Viscor, Ivo $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Department of Medical Signals, Brno, (F.P., P.J., J.H., P.N., I.V., V.V.).
700    1_
$a Vondra, Vlastimil $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Department of Medical Signals, Brno, (F.P., P.J., J.H., P.N., I.V., V.V.).
700    1_
$a McNitt, Scott $u Heart Research Follow-up Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY (S.M., B.P., A.J.M., W.Z., J.-P.C.).
700    1_
$a Polonsky, Bronislava $u Heart Research Follow-up Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY (S.M., B.P., A.J.M., W.Z., J.-P.C.).
700    1_
$a Moss, Arthur J $u Heart Research Follow-up Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY (S.M., B.P., A.J.M., W.Z., J.-P.C.).
700    1_
$a Zareba, Wojciech $u Heart Research Follow-up Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY (S.M., B.P., A.J.M., W.Z., J.-P.C.).
700    1_
$a Couderc, Jean-Philippe $u Heart Research Follow-up Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY (S.M., B.P., A.J.M., W.Z., J.-P.C.).
773    0_
$w MED00159578 $t Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology $x 1941-3084 $g Roč. 11, č. 5 (2018), s. e005719
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29700054 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191014100337 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451939 $s 1073829
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 11 $c 5 $d e005719 $e 20180426 $i 1941-3084 $m Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology $n Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol $x MED00159578
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...