• Something wrong with this record ?

Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy

E. Somogyi, L. Jacquey, T. Heed, M. Hoffmann, JJ. Lockman, L. Granjon, J. Fagard, JK. O'Regan,

. 2018 ; 36 (3) : 384-401. [pub] 20171211

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
R01 HD067581 NICHD NIH HHS - United States

This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants' motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants' four limbs one at a time. Four age groups were compared cross-sectionally (3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-month-olds). We show that before they actually reach for the buzzer, which, according to previous studies, occurs around 7-8 months of age, infants demonstrate emerging knowledge about their body's configuration by producing specific movement patterns associated with the stimulated body area. At 3 months, infants responded with an increase in general activity when the buzzer was placed on the body, independently of the vibrator's location. Differentiated topographical awareness of the body seemed to appear around 5 months, with specific responses resulting from stimulation of the hands emerging first, followed by the differentiation of movement patterns associated with the stimulation of the feet. Qualitative analyses revealed specific movement types reliably associated with each stimulated location by 6 months of age, possibly preparing infants' ability to actually reach for the vibrating target. We discuss this result in relation to newborns' ability to learn specific movement patterns through intersensory contingency. Statement of contribution what is already known on infants' sensorimotor knowledge about their own bodies 3-month-olds readily learn to produce specific limb movements to obtain a desired effect (movement of a mobile). infants detect temporal and spatial correspondences between events involving their own body and visual events. what the present study adds until 4-5 months of age, infants mostly produce general motor responses to localized touch. this is because in the present study, infants could not rely on immediate contingent feedback. we propose a cephalocaudal developmental trend of topographic differentiation of body areas.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035489
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191017093256.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/bjdp.12224 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29226463
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Somogyi, Eszter $u Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.
245    10
$a Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy / $c E. Somogyi, L. Jacquey, T. Heed, M. Hoffmann, JJ. Lockman, L. Granjon, J. Fagard, JK. O'Regan,
520    9_
$a This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants' motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants' four limbs one at a time. Four age groups were compared cross-sectionally (3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-month-olds). We show that before they actually reach for the buzzer, which, according to previous studies, occurs around 7-8 months of age, infants demonstrate emerging knowledge about their body's configuration by producing specific movement patterns associated with the stimulated body area. At 3 months, infants responded with an increase in general activity when the buzzer was placed on the body, independently of the vibrator's location. Differentiated topographical awareness of the body seemed to appear around 5 months, with specific responses resulting from stimulation of the hands emerging first, followed by the differentiation of movement patterns associated with the stimulation of the feet. Qualitative analyses revealed specific movement types reliably associated with each stimulated location by 6 months of age, possibly preparing infants' ability to actually reach for the vibrating target. We discuss this result in relation to newborns' ability to learn specific movement patterns through intersensory contingency. Statement of contribution what is already known on infants' sensorimotor knowledge about their own bodies 3-month-olds readily learn to produce specific limb movements to obtain a desired effect (movement of a mobile). infants detect temporal and spatial correspondences between events involving their own body and visual events. what the present study adds until 4-5 months of age, infants mostly produce general motor responses to localized touch. this is because in the present study, infants could not rely on immediate contingent feedback. we propose a cephalocaudal developmental trend of topographic differentiation of body areas.
650    _2
$a vývoj dítěte $x fyziologie $7 D002657
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a končetiny $x fyziologie $7 D005121
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a chování kojenců $x fyziologie $7 D018730
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a pohyb $x fyziologie $7 D009068
650    _2
$a fyzikální stimulace $7 D010812
650    _2
$a hmatová percepce $x fyziologie $7 D055698
650    _2
$a vibrace $7 D014732
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Jacquey, Lisa $u Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.
700    1_
$a Heed, Tobias $u Biopsychology & Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology & Sports Science and Center of Excellence "Cognitive Interaction Technology", Bielefeld University, Germany.
700    1_
$a Hoffmann, Matej $u Center for Machine Perception, Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic. iCub Facility, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.
700    1_
$a Lockman, Jeffrey J $u Department of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
700    1_
$a Granjon, Lionel $u Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.
700    1_
$a Fagard, Jacqueline $u Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.
700    1_
$a O'Regan, J Kevin $u Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8242, France.
773    0_
$w MED00007148 $t The British journal of developmental psychology $x 2044-835X $g Roč. 36, č. 3 (2018), s. 384-401
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29226463 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191017093724 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1452149 $s 1074039
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 36 $c 3 $d 384-401 $e 20171211 $i 2044-835X $m British journal of developmental psychology $n Br. j. dev. psychol. $x MED00007148
GRA    __
$a R01 HD067581 $p NICHD NIH HHS $2 United States
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...