-
Something wrong with this record ?
Similarities and differences regarding changes in attachment preferences and attachment styles in relation to romantic relationship length: longitudinal and concurrent analyses
T. Umemura, L. Lacinová, K. Kotrčová, RC. Fraley,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Interpersonal Relations MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Longitudinal Studies MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Courtship psychology MeSH
- Friends psychology MeSH
- Object Attachment * MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Psychological Theory MeSH
- Sex Factors MeSH
- Age Factors MeSH
- Parent-Child Relations * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
This study examines whether attachment preferences and attachment styles with different figures (mother, father, romantic partner, and friends) change over the course of a romantic relationship. Study 1 employed a three-wave longitudinal sample of Czech young adults who were currently in a romantic relationship (N = 870; mean age = 21.57; SD = 1.51; 81% females). Multilevel modeling analyses revealed that, as romantic relationships progressed, attachment preferences for romantic partners increased and preferences for friends decreased. However, preferences for the mother or for the father did not change over time. The parallel pattern was found for attachment avoidance; as romantic relationships progressed, attachment avoidance with romantic partners decreased and avoidance with the best friend increased. Avoidance with mother or with father, however, did not change over time. Study 2 employed a cross-sectional international sample (n = 2,593; mean age = 31.99; SD = 12.13; 79% females). Multiple regression analyses replicated the findings of attachment avoidance in the longitudinal data.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19035575
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191010110050.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/14616734.2017.1383488 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28959920
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Umemura, Tomotaka $u a Faculty of Education , Hiroshima University , Higashi-Hiroshima , Japan. b Faculty of Social Studies , Masaryk University , Brno , Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Similarities and differences regarding changes in attachment preferences and attachment styles in relation to romantic relationship length: longitudinal and concurrent analyses / $c T. Umemura, L. Lacinová, K. Kotrčová, RC. Fraley,
- 520 9_
- $a This study examines whether attachment preferences and attachment styles with different figures (mother, father, romantic partner, and friends) change over the course of a romantic relationship. Study 1 employed a three-wave longitudinal sample of Czech young adults who were currently in a romantic relationship (N = 870; mean age = 21.57; SD = 1.51; 81% females). Multilevel modeling analyses revealed that, as romantic relationships progressed, attachment preferences for romantic partners increased and preferences for friends decreased. However, preferences for the mother or for the father did not change over time. The parallel pattern was found for attachment avoidance; as romantic relationships progressed, attachment avoidance with romantic partners decreased and avoidance with the best friend increased. Avoidance with mother or with father, however, did not change over time. Study 2 employed a cross-sectional international sample (n = 2,593; mean age = 31.99; SD = 12.13; 79% females). Multiple regression analyses replicated the findings of attachment avoidance in the longitudinal data.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a věkové faktory $7 D000367
- 650 _2
- $a námluvy $x psychologie $7 D003380
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a přátelé $x psychologie $7 D033062
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a interpersonální vztahy $7 D007398
- 650 _2
- $a longitudinální studie $7 D008137
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a připoutání k objektu $7 D009769
- 650 12
- $a vztahy mezi rodiči a dětmi $7 D010287
- 650 _2
- $a psychologická teorie $7 D011582
- 650 _2
- $a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Lacinová, Lenka $u b Faculty of Social Studies , Masaryk University , Brno , Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kotrčová, Kristína $u b Faculty of Social Studies , Masaryk University , Brno , Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fraley, R Chris $u b Faculty of Social Studies , Masaryk University , Brno , Czech Republic. c Psychology , University of Illinois , Champaign , IL , USA.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006267 $t Attachment & human development $x 1469-2988 $g Roč. 20, č. 2 (2018), s. 135-159
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28959920 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191010110509 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1452235 $s 1074125
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 20 $c 2 $d 135-159 $e 20170929 $i 1469-2988 $m Attachment & human development $n Attach Hum Dev $x MED00006267
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007
