Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Modeling Edar expression reveals the hidden dynamics of tooth signaling center patterning

A. Sadier, M. Twarogowska, K. Steklikova, L. Hayden, A. Lambert, P. Schneider, V. Laudet, M. Hovorakova, V. Calvez, S. Pantalacci,

. 2019 ; 17 (2) : e3000064. [pub] 20190207

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19045007

When patterns are set during embryogenesis, it is expected that they are straightly established rather than subsequently modified. The patterning of the three mouse molars is, however, far from straight, likely as a result of mouse evolutionary history. The first-formed tooth signaling centers, called MS and R2, disappear before driving tooth formation and are thought to be vestiges of the premolars found in mouse ancestors. Moreover, the mature signaling center of the first molar (M1) is formed from the fusion of two signaling centers (R2 and early M1). Here, we report that broad activation of Edar expression precedes its spatial restriction to tooth signaling centers. This reveals a hidden two-step patterning process for tooth signaling centers, which was modeled with a single activator-inhibitor pair subject to reaction-diffusion (RD). The study of Edar expression also unveiled successive phases of signaling center formation, erasing, recovering, and fusion. Our model, in which R2 signaling center is not intrinsically defective but erased by the broad activation preceding M1 signaling center formation, predicted the surprising rescue of R2 in Edar mutant mice, where activation is reduced. The importance of this R2-M1 interaction was confirmed by ex vivo cultures showing that R2 is capable of forming a tooth. Finally, by introducing chemotaxis as a secondary process to RD, we recapitulated in silico different conditions in which R2 and M1 centers fuse or not. In conclusion, pattern formation in the mouse molar field relies on basic mechanisms whose dynamics produce embryonic patterns that are plastic objects rather than fixed end points.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19045007
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200116110407.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000064 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30730874
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Sadier, Alexa $u Laboratoire de Biologie et Modélisation de la Cellule, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Lyon, France. Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, Lyon, France.
245    10
$a Modeling Edar expression reveals the hidden dynamics of tooth signaling center patterning / $c A. Sadier, M. Twarogowska, K. Steklikova, L. Hayden, A. Lambert, P. Schneider, V. Laudet, M. Hovorakova, V. Calvez, S. Pantalacci,
520    9_
$a When patterns are set during embryogenesis, it is expected that they are straightly established rather than subsequently modified. The patterning of the three mouse molars is, however, far from straight, likely as a result of mouse evolutionary history. The first-formed tooth signaling centers, called MS and R2, disappear before driving tooth formation and are thought to be vestiges of the premolars found in mouse ancestors. Moreover, the mature signaling center of the first molar (M1) is formed from the fusion of two signaling centers (R2 and early M1). Here, we report that broad activation of Edar expression precedes its spatial restriction to tooth signaling centers. This reveals a hidden two-step patterning process for tooth signaling centers, which was modeled with a single activator-inhibitor pair subject to reaction-diffusion (RD). The study of Edar expression also unveiled successive phases of signaling center formation, erasing, recovering, and fusion. Our model, in which R2 signaling center is not intrinsically defective but erased by the broad activation preceding M1 signaling center formation, predicted the surprising rescue of R2 in Edar mutant mice, where activation is reduced. The importance of this R2-M1 interaction was confirmed by ex vivo cultures showing that R2 is capable of forming a tooth. Finally, by introducing chemotaxis as a secondary process to RD, we recapitulated in silico different conditions in which R2 and M1 centers fuse or not. In conclusion, pattern formation in the mouse molar field relies on basic mechanisms whose dynamics produce embryonic patterns that are plastic objects rather than fixed end points.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a rozvržení tělního plánu $7 D019521
650    _2
$a chemotaxe $7 D002633
650    _2
$a receptor Edar $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D053339
650    _2
$a epitel $x embryologie $x metabolismus $7 D004848
650    _2
$a vývojová regulace genové exprese $7 D018507
650    _2
$a vlasy, chlupy $x embryologie $7 D006197
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a mutantní kmeny myší $7 D008817
650    12
$a biologické modely $7 D008954
650    12
$a signální transdukce $7 D015398
650    _2
$a zuby $x embryologie $x metabolismus $7 D014070
650    _2
$a zubní zárodek $x embryologie $x metabolismus $7 D014083
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Twarogowska, Monika $u Unité de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, project team Inria NUMED, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5669, Lyon, France.
700    1_
$a Steklikova, Klara $u Institute of Experimental Medicine, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hayden, Luke $u Laboratoire de Biologie et Modélisation de la Cellule, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Lyon, France. Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, Lyon, France.
700    1_
$a Lambert, Anne $u Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, Lyon, France.
700    1_
$a Schneider, Pascal $u Department of Biochemistry, University of Lausanne, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Laudet, Vincent $u Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, Lyon, France.
700    1_
$a Hovorakova, Maria $u Institute of Experimental Medicine, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Calvez, Vincent $u Institut Camille Jordan, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5208, Lyon, France.
700    1_
$a Pantalacci, Sophie $u Laboratoire de Biologie et Modélisation de la Cellule, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Lyon, France. Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, Lyon, France.
773    0_
$w MED00008061 $t PLoS biology $x 1545-7885 $g Roč. 17, č. 2 (2019), s. e3000064
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30730874 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200116110741 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483276 $s 1083680
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 17 $c 2 $d e3000064 $e 20190207 $i 1545-7885 $m PLoS biology $n Plos Biol $x MED00008061
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109
Back

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options