Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Retinal photoreceptor and ganglion cell types and topographies in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus)

EP. Malkemper, L. Peichl,

. 2018 ; 526 (13) : 2078-2098. [pub] 20180723

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19045375

The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is the carnivore with the widest distribution in the world. Not much is known about the visual system of these predominantly forest-dwelling animals. The closely related Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) lives in more open tundra habitats. In search for corresponding adaptations, we examined the photoreceptors and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), using opsin immunohistochemistry, lucifer yellow injections and Nissl staining. Both species possess a majority of middle-to-longwave-sensitive (M/L) and a minority of shortwave-sensitive (S) cones, indicating dichromatic color vision. Area centralis peak cone densities are 22,600/mm2 in the red fox and 44,800/mm2 in the Arctic fox. Both have a centro-peripheral density decrease of M/L cones, and a dorsoventrally increasing density of S cones. Rod densities and rod/cone ratios are higher in the red fox than the Arctic fox. Both species possess the carnivore-typical alpha and beta RGCs. The RGC topography shows a centro-peripheral density gradient with a distinct area centralis (mean peak density 7,900 RGCs/mm2 in the red fox and 10,000 RGCs/mm2 in the Arctic fox), a prominent visual streak of higher RGC densities in the Arctic fox, and a moderate visual streak in the red fox. Visual acuity and estimated sound localization ability were nearly identical between both species. In summary, the red fox retina shows adaptations to nocturnal activity in a forest habitat, while the Arctic fox retina is better adapted to higher light levels in the open tundra.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19045375
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200120085508.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/cne.24493 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30001466
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Malkemper, Erich Pascal $u Department of General Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha 6, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Retinal photoreceptor and ganglion cell types and topographies in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) / $c EP. Malkemper, L. Peichl,
520    9_
$a The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is the carnivore with the widest distribution in the world. Not much is known about the visual system of these predominantly forest-dwelling animals. The closely related Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) lives in more open tundra habitats. In search for corresponding adaptations, we examined the photoreceptors and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), using opsin immunohistochemistry, lucifer yellow injections and Nissl staining. Both species possess a majority of middle-to-longwave-sensitive (M/L) and a minority of shortwave-sensitive (S) cones, indicating dichromatic color vision. Area centralis peak cone densities are 22,600/mm2 in the red fox and 44,800/mm2 in the Arctic fox. Both have a centro-peripheral density decrease of M/L cones, and a dorsoventrally increasing density of S cones. Rod densities and rod/cone ratios are higher in the red fox than the Arctic fox. Both species possess the carnivore-typical alpha and beta RGCs. The RGC topography shows a centro-peripheral density gradient with a distinct area centralis (mean peak density 7,900 RGCs/mm2 in the red fox and 10,000 RGCs/mm2 in the Arctic fox), a prominent visual streak of higher RGC densities in the Arctic fox, and a moderate visual streak in the red fox. Visual acuity and estimated sound localization ability were nearly identical between both species. In summary, the red fox retina shows adaptations to nocturnal activity in a forest habitat, while the Arctic fox retina is better adapted to higher light levels in the open tundra.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a vidění barevné $x fyziologie $7 D055253
650    _2
$a životní prostředí $7 D004777
650    _2
$a oči $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005123
650    _2
$a lišky $x fyziologie $7 D005589
650    _2
$a imunohistochemie $7 D007150
650    _2
$a opsiny $x metabolismus $7 D055355
650    _2
$a fotoreceptory obratlovců $x fyziologie $7 D020419
650    _2
$a čípky retiny $x fyziologie $7 D017949
650    _2
$a retinální gangliové buňky $x fyziologie $7 D012165
650    _2
$a tyčinky retiny $x fyziologie $7 D017948
650    _2
$a lokalizace zvuku $x fyziologie $7 D013017
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
650    _2
$a zraková ostrost $x fyziologie $7 D014792
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Peichl, Leo $u Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Institute of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Dr. Senckenbergische Anatomie, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00014042 $t The Journal of comparative neurology $x 1096-9861 $g Roč. 526, č. 13 (2018), s. 2078-2098
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30001466 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200120085844 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483644 $s 1084048
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 526 $c 13 $d 2078-2098 $e 20180723 $i 1096-9861 $m Journal of comparative neurology $n J Comp Neurol $x MED00014042
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...