-
Something wrong with this record ?
Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators
FH. Boot, J. Owuor, J. Dinsmore, M. MacLachlan,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Systematic Review
NLK
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
PubMed
29992653
DOI
10.1111/jir.12532
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Health Services Accessibility economics statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Intellectual Disability rehabilitation MeSH
- Persons with Intellectual Disabilities rehabilitation MeSH
- Self-Help Devices economics statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation has launched a programme to promote Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology. Its aim is to increase access to high-quality affordable assistive products (AP) for everybody in need. People with intellectual disabilities (ID) are a specific group that could benefit from AP, but use less AP compared to their non-intellectual disabled peers. METHOD: A systematic literature search was carried out to identify barriers and potential facilitators for access to AP for people with ID globally. The search strategy terms were 'Intellectual Disability' and 'Assistive Technology' with the following electronic literature databases PubMed, Embase, ASSIA, Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL complete, PsycInfo, Scopus and ERIC. The quality and relevance of the studies were assessed. Factors associated with access were identified thematically, categorised into barriers and facilitators and mapped into themes. RESULTS: In all, 22 key studies were retrieved, describing 77 barriers and 56 facilitators. The most frequently reported barriers were related to lack of funding and cost of AP, lack of awareness about AP and inadequate assessment. An increase of knowledge and awareness about AP and the need of AP for people with ID were most often extracted as factors that could potentially facilitate access. CONCLUSIONS: This review proposes actions linked to the barriers and facilitators that have a particular importance for people with ID to access AP. Yet, only limited research is available describing factors that influence access to AP for people with ID in low and middle income countries and rural areas.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19045378
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200115101220.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200109s2018 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/jir.12532 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29992653
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Boot, F H $u Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland. Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- 245 10
- $a Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators / $c FH. Boot, J. Owuor, J. Dinsmore, M. MacLachlan,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation has launched a programme to promote Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology. Its aim is to increase access to high-quality affordable assistive products (AP) for everybody in need. People with intellectual disabilities (ID) are a specific group that could benefit from AP, but use less AP compared to their non-intellectual disabled peers. METHOD: A systematic literature search was carried out to identify barriers and potential facilitators for access to AP for people with ID globally. The search strategy terms were 'Intellectual Disability' and 'Assistive Technology' with the following electronic literature databases PubMed, Embase, ASSIA, Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL complete, PsycInfo, Scopus and ERIC. The quality and relevance of the studies were assessed. Factors associated with access were identified thematically, categorised into barriers and facilitators and mapped into themes. RESULTS: In all, 22 key studies were retrieved, describing 77 barriers and 56 facilitators. The most frequently reported barriers were related to lack of funding and cost of AP, lack of awareness about AP and inadequate assessment. An increase of knowledge and awareness about AP and the need of AP for people with ID were most often extracted as factors that could potentially facilitate access. CONCLUSIONS: This review proposes actions linked to the barriers and facilitators that have a particular importance for people with ID to access AP. Yet, only limited research is available describing factors that influence access to AP for people with ID in low and middle income countries and rural areas.
- 650 _2
- $a dostupnost zdravotnických služeb $x ekonomika $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D006297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mentální retardace $x rehabilitace $7 D008607
- 650 _2
- $a osoby s mentálním postižením $x rehabilitace $7 D019989
- 650 _2
- $a pomůcky pro sebeobsluhu $x ekonomika $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012656
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Owuor, J $u Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland. Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- 700 1_
- $a Dinsmore, J $u Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- 700 1_
- $a MacLachlan, M $u Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland. Centre for Rehabilitation Studies, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007288 $t Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR $x 1365-2788 $g Roč. 62, č. 10 (2018), s. 900-921
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29992653 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200115101553 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1483647 $s 1084051
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 62 $c 10 $d 900-921 $e 20180710 $i 1365-2788 $m JIDR. Journal of intellectual disability research $n J Intellect Disabil Res $x MED00007288
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200109
