-
Something wrong with this record ?
První zkušenosti s kranioplastikou pomocí implantátu z polyetereterketonu (PEEK) - retrospektivní studie při pětiletém sledování
[First experience with cranioplasty using the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implant - retrospective five-year follow-up study]
F. Šámal, M. Ouzký, J. Strnad, P. Haninec, P. Linzer, M. Filip
Language Czech Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
31941571
- MeSH
- Biocompatible Materials administration & dosage MeSH
- Ketones administration & dosage MeSH
- Skull surgery MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Polyethylene Glycols administration & dosage MeSH
- Prostheses and Implants MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Plastic Surgery Procedures instrumentation methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Cranioplasty is currently the most common neurosurgical procedure. The purpose of this study is to describe the first experience with successful use of the Cranio-Oss (PEEK) custom implant for cranioplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the period 2012 to 2013, a total of 26 cranioplasties were performed. In fourteen patients, their own bone flap was used for reconstruction. In four cases, a synthetic Cranio-Oss bone implant made of PEEK was used. In six patients, the defect was covered by an intraoperatively-made Palacos implant and in two cases, minor defects were covered with a titanium mesh. The patients were followed up for at least five years. Cranio-Oss is a cranial implant made from polyetheretherketone (PEEK), a synthetic biocompatible material. The implant is created using the CAD/CAM method in the shape of the bone defect based on the CT scan. Creating optimal roughness of the implant surface and of the surface of the contact area attached to the bone bed is controlled and included already in the strategy for machining individual areas of the implant during its manufacturing at a 5-axis machining centre. RESULTS The Cranio-Oss implant was used in four younger patients to cover larger and complex-shaped defects. The mean age of patients in this group was 47 years. The implant was fixed to the skull by micro-plates. In all the cases the wound healed well with good cosmetic results without the necessity of revision with respect to the used implant. The follow-up CT scans always showed the implant in situ with no signs of malposition. DISCUSSION Autologous bone flap is the most suitable material for defect reconstruction after craniectomy. This option is affordable and represents one of the best methods of reconstruction of defects after craniectomy in terms of cosmetic results. In some cases, the original skull cannot be used for cranioplasty (e.g. if destructed by tumourous process, infected or in comminuted fractures). In such cases, the defect needs to be managed using a synthetic implant. In case of extensive defects, the most suitable option is a custom made implant from advanced biomaterials. CONCLUSIONS Authors prefer using autologous bone flaps during cranioplasty. In cases where this method is unavailable, a synthetic bone substitute has to be used. The first medium-term experience with the use of a Cranio-Oss implant made of PEEK showed that it is a suitable alternative to the patient's own bone. No complications associated with this synthetic implant were reported and its use to manage skull defects can be strongly recommended. With respect to legal and accreditationrelated difficulties connected with bone fragments storage and thanks to the continuous cost reduction of synthetic implants will their importance grow in the future. Key words: decompressive craniectomy, bone substitute, craniotrauma.
Neurochirurgická oddělení Krajská nemocnice Tomáše Bati Zlín
Ústav rehabilitace Lékařská fakulta Ostravské univerzity Ostrava
First experience with cranioplasty using the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implant - retrospective five-year follow-up study
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19047473
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200213135050.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200205s2019 xr do f 000 0|cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2019/072
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31941571
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Šámal, Filip, $d 1973- $7 xx0211243 $u Neurochirurgická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady a 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy, Praha
- 245 10
- $a První zkušenosti s kranioplastikou pomocí implantátu z polyetereterketonu (PEEK) - retrospektivní studie při pětiletém sledování / $c F. Šámal, M. Ouzký, J. Strnad, P. Haninec, P. Linzer, M. Filip
- 246 31
- $a First experience with cranioplasty using the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implant - retrospective five-year follow-up study
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Cranioplasty is currently the most common neurosurgical procedure. The purpose of this study is to describe the first experience with successful use of the Cranio-Oss (PEEK) custom implant for cranioplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the period 2012 to 2013, a total of 26 cranioplasties were performed. In fourteen patients, their own bone flap was used for reconstruction. In four cases, a synthetic Cranio-Oss bone implant made of PEEK was used. In six patients, the defect was covered by an intraoperatively-made Palacos implant and in two cases, minor defects were covered with a titanium mesh. The patients were followed up for at least five years. Cranio-Oss is a cranial implant made from polyetheretherketone (PEEK), a synthetic biocompatible material. The implant is created using the CAD/CAM method in the shape of the bone defect based on the CT scan. Creating optimal roughness of the implant surface and of the surface of the contact area attached to the bone bed is controlled and included already in the strategy for machining individual areas of the implant during its manufacturing at a 5-axis machining centre. RESULTS The Cranio-Oss implant was used in four younger patients to cover larger and complex-shaped defects. The mean age of patients in this group was 47 years. The implant was fixed to the skull by micro-plates. In all the cases the wound healed well with good cosmetic results without the necessity of revision with respect to the used implant. The follow-up CT scans always showed the implant in situ with no signs of malposition. DISCUSSION Autologous bone flap is the most suitable material for defect reconstruction after craniectomy. This option is affordable and represents one of the best methods of reconstruction of defects after craniectomy in terms of cosmetic results. In some cases, the original skull cannot be used for cranioplasty (e.g. if destructed by tumourous process, infected or in comminuted fractures). In such cases, the defect needs to be managed using a synthetic implant. In case of extensive defects, the most suitable option is a custom made implant from advanced biomaterials. CONCLUSIONS Authors prefer using autologous bone flaps during cranioplasty. In cases where this method is unavailable, a synthetic bone substitute has to be used. The first medium-term experience with the use of a Cranio-Oss implant made of PEEK showed that it is a suitable alternative to the patient's own bone. No complications associated with this synthetic implant were reported and its use to manage skull defects can be strongly recommended. With respect to legal and accreditationrelated difficulties connected with bone fragments storage and thanks to the continuous cost reduction of synthetic implants will their importance grow in the future. Key words: decompressive craniectomy, bone substitute, craniotrauma.
- 650 _2
- $a biokompatibilní materiály $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D001672
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ketony $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D007659
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a polyethylenglykoly $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D011092
- 650 _2
- $a protézy a implantáty $7 D019736
- 650 _2
- $a zákroky plastické chirurgie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D019651
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a lebka $x chirurgie $7 D012886
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Ouzký, Martin $7 xx0244778 $u Neurochirurgická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady a 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy, Praha
- 700 1_
- $a Strnad, Jakub $7 xx0143465 $u LASAK, s.r.o., Praha
- 700 1_
- $a Haninec, Pavel, $d 1958- $7 xx0063333 $u Neurochirurgická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady a 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy, Praha
- 700 1_
- $a Linzer, Petr $7 xx0242115 $u Neurochirurgická oddělení, Krajská nemocnice Tomáše Bati, Zlín
- 700 1_
- $a Filip, Michal, $d 1959- $7 xx0037837 $u Ústav rehabilitace, Lékařská fakulta Ostravské univerzity, Ostrava
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 86, č. 6 (2019), s. 431-434
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200205 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200210133007 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1493319 $s 1086193
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 86 $c 6 $d 431-434 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20200205