Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Methods evaluating upper arm and forearm movement during a quiet stance

Petr Volf, Patrik Kutilek, Jan Hejda, Rudolf Cerny, Iva Milerska, Karel Hana

. 2019 ; 49 (2) : 58-65.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The article focuses on designing methods for quantitative assessment of the postural stability in a quiet stance by measuring segments of the appendicular skeleton, namely upper and forearms by inertial measurement units (IMU). Although an array of quantitative analysis methods assessing data of postural stability in the quiet stance exist by measuring the head and trunk movement, these methods have not been used to date to assess the behavior of appendicular skeleton segments, namely the upper limbs. The applicability of methods assessing arm movement during the quiet stance has been verified by comparing the values of healthy subjects performing various stance tasks. The tests determined the quantitative evaluation of acceleration measured on individual anatomical axes. The quantities included: the volume of a convex polyhedron (PV), the volume of confidence ellipsoid (EV) and average velocity (AV) obtained by plotting three accelerations against each other. The most important findings in this study concern significant differences of PV and AV between dominant and non-dominant upper extremities and significant differences of EV, PV and AV between the data measured with a subject';s eyes closed and open. Higher values of indicators were in the non-dominant extremities when subjects were measured with closed eyes. Statistically significant differences between dominant and non-dominant arm movements were documented in PV and AV cases. This is due to the PV calculation being more sensitive to random deviations, i.e. the range of measured data, since the polyhedron bounds all the measured data, as opposed to the method, where the ellipse bounds only 95% of the measured data. In the case of the AV method, it is due to higher sensitivity to movements corresponding with arm tremors; the AV calculation relates not only to the range of measured data but, above all, to the intensity of data changes in the segment measured in a particular space and time interval. These conclusions demonstrate that it is possible to apply the proposed methods in the assessment of arm movement during a quiet stance since the differences between individual stance tasks and the dominant and non-dominant arms in specific cases of quiet stance have been identified. These conclusions also indicate a potentially more extensive medical application of the proposed quantitative data evaluation obtained from IMU, for example, within the rehabilitation process of injured appendicular skeleton segments. The use of cheaper IMU methods in mobile phones or watches can be of significant benefit in measuring the segmental movement of the appendicular skeleton in quiet stance. The methods outlined in this paper have potential in the field of telemedicine.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19047535
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200212211433.0
007      
ta
008      
200205s2019 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.14311/ctj.2019.2.04 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Volf, Petr $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic $7 xx0244746
245    10
$a Methods evaluating upper arm and forearm movement during a quiet stance / $c Petr Volf, Patrik Kutilek, Jan Hejda, Rudolf Cerny, Iva Milerska, Karel Hana
520    9_
$a The article focuses on designing methods for quantitative assessment of the postural stability in a quiet stance by measuring segments of the appendicular skeleton, namely upper and forearms by inertial measurement units (IMU). Although an array of quantitative analysis methods assessing data of postural stability in the quiet stance exist by measuring the head and trunk movement, these methods have not been used to date to assess the behavior of appendicular skeleton segments, namely the upper limbs. The applicability of methods assessing arm movement during the quiet stance has been verified by comparing the values of healthy subjects performing various stance tasks. The tests determined the quantitative evaluation of acceleration measured on individual anatomical axes. The quantities included: the volume of a convex polyhedron (PV), the volume of confidence ellipsoid (EV) and average velocity (AV) obtained by plotting three accelerations against each other. The most important findings in this study concern significant differences of PV and AV between dominant and non-dominant upper extremities and significant differences of EV, PV and AV between the data measured with a subject';s eyes closed and open. Higher values of indicators were in the non-dominant extremities when subjects were measured with closed eyes. Statistically significant differences between dominant and non-dominant arm movements were documented in PV and AV cases. This is due to the PV calculation being more sensitive to random deviations, i.e. the range of measured data, since the polyhedron bounds all the measured data, as opposed to the method, where the ellipse bounds only 95% of the measured data. In the case of the AV method, it is due to higher sensitivity to movements corresponding with arm tremors; the AV calculation relates not only to the range of measured data but, above all, to the intensity of data changes in the segment measured in a particular space and time interval. These conclusions demonstrate that it is possible to apply the proposed methods in the assessment of arm movement during a quiet stance since the differences between individual stance tasks and the dominant and non-dominant arms in specific cases of quiet stance have been identified. These conclusions also indicate a potentially more extensive medical application of the proposed quantitative data evaluation obtained from IMU, for example, within the rehabilitation process of injured appendicular skeleton segments. The use of cheaper IMU methods in mobile phones or watches can be of significant benefit in measuring the segmental movement of the appendicular skeleton in quiet stance. The methods outlined in this paper have potential in the field of telemedicine.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    _2
$a paže $7 D001132
650    12
$a posturální rovnováha $7 D004856
650    _2
$a zrychlení $7 D000054
650    _2
$a kineziologie aplikovaná $x metody $7 D018953
650    _2
$a výzkum $7 D012106
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kutílek, Patrik $u Department of Natural Science, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic $7 xx0044116
700    1_
$a Hejda, Jan. $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic $7 xx0244678
700    1_
$a Černý, Rudolf, $u University Hospital Motol – 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1956- $7 xx0061683
700    1_
$a Milerská, Iva $u Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0244745
700    1_
$a Hána, Karel, $u Department of Information and Communication Technologies in Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic $d 1970- $7 ntka172706
773    0_
$w MED00011033 $t Lékař a technika $x 0301-5491 $g Roč. 49, č. 2 (2019), s. 58-65
856    41
$u https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/CTJ/article/view/04/5315 $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 1367 $c 1071 b $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20200205 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200212211828 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1491297 $s 1086255
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 49 $c 2 $d 58-65 $i 0301-5491 $m Lékař a technika $x MED00011033 $y 121127
LZP    __
$c NLK109 $d 20200212 $b NLK111 $a Meditorial-20200205

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...