• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Abiotic, present-day and historical effects on species, functional and phylogenetic diversity in dry grasslands of different age

R. Belinchón, L. Hemrová, Z. Münzbergová,

. 2019 ; 14 (10) : e0223826. [pub] 20191015

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20005800

Many grasslands have disappeared over the last century as a result of anthropogenic land use intensification, while new patches are emerging through abandonment of arable fields. Here, we compared species (SD), functional (FD) and phylogenetic (PD) (alpha) diversity among 272 dry grassland patches of two age-classes: old and new, with the new patches being dry grasslands established on previous intensively managed fields during the last 30 years. We first compared SD, FD and PD, between patches of different age. Then, we performed generalized linear models to determine the influence of abiotic, present-day and historical landscape configuration variables on SD, FD and PD. By measuring abiotic variables, we explained the effect of environmental filtering on species diversity, whereas the present-day and historical landscape configuration variables were included to describe how the spatial and temporal configuration of the patches influence patterns of species. Finally, we applied partial regressions to explore the relative importance of abiotic, present-day and historical variables in explaining the diversity metrics and how this varies between patches of different ages. We found higher SD in the old compared to the new patches, but no changes in FD and PD. SD was mostly affected by abiotic and present-day landscape configuration variables in the new and the old patches, respectively. In the new patches, historical variables explained variation in the FD, while present-day variables explained the PD. In the old patches, historical variables accounted for most of the variation in both FD and PD. Our evidence suggests that the relative importance of assembly processes has changed over time, showing that environmental filtering and changes in the landscape configuration prevented the establishment of species in the new patches. However, the loss of species (i.e. SD) is not necessarily linked to a loss of functions and evolutionary potential.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20005800
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200518132115.0
007      
ta
008      
200511s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0223826 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31613919
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Belinchón, Rocío $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Abiotic, present-day and historical effects on species, functional and phylogenetic diversity in dry grasslands of different age / $c R. Belinchón, L. Hemrová, Z. Münzbergová,
520    9_
$a Many grasslands have disappeared over the last century as a result of anthropogenic land use intensification, while new patches are emerging through abandonment of arable fields. Here, we compared species (SD), functional (FD) and phylogenetic (PD) (alpha) diversity among 272 dry grassland patches of two age-classes: old and new, with the new patches being dry grasslands established on previous intensively managed fields during the last 30 years. We first compared SD, FD and PD, between patches of different age. Then, we performed generalized linear models to determine the influence of abiotic, present-day and historical landscape configuration variables on SD, FD and PD. By measuring abiotic variables, we explained the effect of environmental filtering on species diversity, whereas the present-day and historical landscape configuration variables were included to describe how the spatial and temporal configuration of the patches influence patterns of species. Finally, we applied partial regressions to explore the relative importance of abiotic, present-day and historical variables in explaining the diversity metrics and how this varies between patches of different ages. We found higher SD in the old compared to the new patches, but no changes in FD and PD. SD was mostly affected by abiotic and present-day landscape configuration variables in the new and the old patches, respectively. In the new patches, historical variables explained variation in the FD, while present-day variables explained the PD. In the old patches, historical variables accounted for most of the variation in both FD and PD. Our evidence suggests that the relative importance of assembly processes has changed over time, showing that environmental filtering and changes in the landscape configuration prevented the establishment of species in the new patches. However, the loss of species (i.e. SD) is not necessarily linked to a loss of functions and evolutionary potential.
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
650    _2
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
650    _2
$a pastviny $7 D065948
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a lipnicovité $x klasifikace $x růst a vývoj $7 D006109
650    _2
$a populační dynamika $7 D011157
650    _2
$a fyziologický stres $7 D013312
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hemrová, Lucie $u Institute of Botany CAS, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Münzbergová, Zuzana $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany CAS, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 14, č. 10 (2019), s. e0223826
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31613919 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200511 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200518132114 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1524658 $s 1095856
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 14 $c 10 $d e0223826 $e 20191015 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200511

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...