-
Something wrong with this record ?
Neurofilament levels in patients with neurological diseases: A comparison of neurofilament light and heavy chain levels
P. Kušnierová, D. Zeman, P. Hradílek, M. Čábal, O. Zapletalová,
Language English Country United States
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
Grant support
FNOs/2017
Ministry of Health, Czech Republic
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2019
PubMed Central
from 1997
Europe PubMed Central
from 1997
ProQuest Central
from 2019-03-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2012-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2019-03-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2019-03-01
Wiley Free Content
from 1996
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
from 2019
PubMed
31199010
DOI
10.1002/jcla.22948
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Analysis of Variance MeSH
- Intermediate Filaments metabolism MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Nervous System Diseases blood diagnosis metabolism MeSH
- Neurofilament Proteins blood cerebrospinal fluid metabolism MeSH
- Regression Analysis MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Neurofilaments are the major cytoskeletal components of neurons, and cell injury leads to their release into the surrounding area. The aim of this study was to compare the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum (S) concentrations of neurofilament light chains (NFLs) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chains (pNFHs). METHODS: Neurofilament concentrations were measured in CSF and S samples from 172 patients using three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Excel, Stata version 13, MedCal version 17.9.7., and NCSS 2007 software were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between the concentrations of CSF NFL and CSF pNFH (rs = 0.748; n = 89; P < 0.001), but Passing-Bablok regression showed systematic deviation between the values obtained using the two assays. This indicates that the assays were not interchangeable. CSF pNFH and S pNFH concentrations showed low correlation. The kappa statistic showed moderate conformity between CSF pNFH and CSF NFL concentrations (κ = 0.556). CONCLUSIONS: The CSF NFL and CSF pNFH assays gave clinically consistent results that reflected the degree of axonal damage, independent of any particular neurological diagnosis. The S pNFH assays had a lower predictive value due to the low correlation coefficient and the kappa index of the CSF pNFH method.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20006258
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200521091336.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/jcla.22948 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31199010
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kušnierová, Pavlína $u Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Neurofilament levels in patients with neurological diseases: A comparison of neurofilament light and heavy chain levels / $c P. Kušnierová, D. Zeman, P. Hradílek, M. Čábal, O. Zapletalová,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Neurofilaments are the major cytoskeletal components of neurons, and cell injury leads to their release into the surrounding area. The aim of this study was to compare the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum (S) concentrations of neurofilament light chains (NFLs) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chains (pNFHs). METHODS: Neurofilament concentrations were measured in CSF and S samples from 172 patients using three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Excel, Stata version 13, MedCal version 17.9.7., and NCSS 2007 software were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between the concentrations of CSF NFL and CSF pNFH (rs = 0.748; n = 89; P < 0.001), but Passing-Bablok regression showed systematic deviation between the values obtained using the two assays. This indicates that the assays were not interchangeable. CSF pNFH and S pNFH concentrations showed low correlation. The kappa statistic showed moderate conformity between CSF pNFH and CSF NFL concentrations (κ = 0.556). CONCLUSIONS: The CSF NFL and CSF pNFH assays gave clinically consistent results that reflected the degree of axonal damage, independent of any particular neurological diagnosis. The S pNFH assays had a lower predictive value due to the low correlation coefficient and the kappa index of the CSF pNFH method.
- 650 _2
- $a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a intermediární filamenta $x metabolismus $7 D007382
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci nervového systému $x krev $x diagnóza $x metabolismus $7 D009422
- 650 _2
- $a neurofilamentové proteiny $x krev $x mozkomíšní mok $x metabolismus $7 D016900
- 650 _2
- $a regresní analýza $7 D012044
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Zeman, David $u Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hradílek, Pavel $u Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Čábal, Martin $u Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zapletalová, Olga $u Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009990 $t Journal of clinical laboratory analysis $x 1098-2825 $g Roč. 33, č. 7 (2019), s. e22948
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31199010 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200521091333 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1525116 $s 1096314
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 33 $c 7 $d e22948 $e 20190614 $i 1098-2825 $m Journal of clinical laboratory analysis $n J Clin Lab Anal $x MED00009990
- GRA __
- $a FNOs/2017 $p Ministry of Health, Czech Republic
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511