Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Feasibility of dietary assessment methods, other tools and procedures for a pan-European food consumption survey among infants, toddlers and children

M. Ocké, H. Brants, M. Dofkova, H. Freisling, C. van Rossum, J. Ruprich, N. Slimani, E. Temme, E. Trolle, S. Vandevijvere, I. Huybrechts, E. de Boer,

. 2015 ; 54 (5) : 721-732. [pub] 20140810

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1999-01-01 to 1 year ago
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) from 2006-02-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 1999-02-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1999-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1999-01-01 to 1 year ago
Family Health Database (ProQuest) from 1999-01-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 1999-01-01 to 1 year ago

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of tools and procedures for a pan-European food consumption survey among children 0-10 years and to recommend one of two tested dietary assessment methods. METHODS: Two pilot studies including 378 children were conducted in Belgium and the Czech Republic in the Pilot studies for Assessment of Nutrient intake and food Consumption among Kids in Europe. One protocol included a 3-day food diary which was checked with a parent, and data were entered afterwards using EPIC-Soft. The alternative protocol consisted of two non-consecutive 1-day food diaries followed by EPIC-Soft completion interviews. Both protocols included general and food propensity questionnaires and anthropometric measurements. The protocols were compared using evaluation questionnaires among the participating parents and study personnel. RESULTS: The parents found the questionnaires and instructions for filling in the food diaries understandable. Food description and food quantification was evaluated as problematic by 29 and 15% of the participants for the 3-day diaries versus 15 and 12% for the 1-day diaries. The protocol with 1-day food diaries was evaluated as less burdensome by the parents and logistically more challenging by the interviewers. CONCLUSIONS: Both dietary assessment methods with related tools and administration protocols were evaluated as feasible. The administration protocol with two 1-day food diaries with completion interviews offers more advantages for the future pan-European survey in children 0-10 years. The positive evaluation of feasibility of tools and materials is an important step towards harmonised food consumption data at European level among the younger age groups.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20014762
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200929121147.0
007      
ta
008      
200922s2015 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00394-014-0750-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25108656
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Ocké, Marga $u National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, marga.ocke@rivm.nl.
245    10
$a Feasibility of dietary assessment methods, other tools and procedures for a pan-European food consumption survey among infants, toddlers and children / $c M. Ocké, H. Brants, M. Dofkova, H. Freisling, C. van Rossum, J. Ruprich, N. Slimani, E. Temme, E. Trolle, S. Vandevijvere, I. Huybrechts, E. de Boer,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of tools and procedures for a pan-European food consumption survey among children 0-10 years and to recommend one of two tested dietary assessment methods. METHODS: Two pilot studies including 378 children were conducted in Belgium and the Czech Republic in the Pilot studies for Assessment of Nutrient intake and food Consumption among Kids in Europe. One protocol included a 3-day food diary which was checked with a parent, and data were entered afterwards using EPIC-Soft. The alternative protocol consisted of two non-consecutive 1-day food diaries followed by EPIC-Soft completion interviews. Both protocols included general and food propensity questionnaires and anthropometric measurements. The protocols were compared using evaluation questionnaires among the participating parents and study personnel. RESULTS: The parents found the questionnaires and instructions for filling in the food diaries understandable. Food description and food quantification was evaluated as problematic by 29 and 15% of the participants for the 3-day diaries versus 15 and 12% for the 1-day diaries. The protocol with 1-day food diaries was evaluated as less burdensome by the parents and logistically more challenging by the interviewers. CONCLUSIONS: Both dietary assessment methods with related tools and administration protocols were evaluated as feasible. The administration protocol with two 1-day food diaries with completion interviews offers more advantages for the future pan-European survey in children 0-10 years. The positive evaluation of feasibility of tools and materials is an important step towards harmonised food consumption data at European level among the younger age groups.
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a věda o výživě dětí $x metody $7 D053198
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a dieta $7 D004032
650    _2
$a dietní záznamy $7 D015930
650    12
$a energetický příjem $7 D002149
650    _2
$a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a rozpomínání $7 D011939
650    12
$a hodnocení stavu výživy $7 D015596
650    _2
$a výživa - přehledy $7 D009749
650    _2
$a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
650    _2
$a software $7 D012984
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
651    _2
$a Belgie $7 D001530
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Brants, Henny
700    1_
$a Dofkova, Marcela
700    1_
$a Freisling, Heinz
700    1_
$a van Rossum, Caroline
700    1_
$a Ruprich, Jiri
700    1_
$a Slimani, Nadia
700    1_
$a Temme, Elisabeth
700    1_
$a Trolle, Ellen
700    1_
$a Vandevijvere, Stefanie
700    1_
$a Huybrechts, Inge
700    1_
$a de Boer, Evelien
773    0_
$w MED00005725 $t European journal of nutrition $x 1436-6215 $g Roč. 54, č. 5 (2015), s. 721-732
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25108656 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200922 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200929121143 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1567623 $s 1104922
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 54 $c 5 $d 721-732 $e 20140810 $i 1436-6215 $m European journal of nutrition $n Eur J Nutr $x MED00005725
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200922

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...