Periprosthetic femoral fractures around the femoral stem of a hip prosthesis constitute a serious challenge. The number of these fractures, associated with a high failure rate and a high number of overall complications, including higher mortality, has been on an increase worldwide. Stable femoral stems are indicated for osteosynthesis, while in case of loosening the method of choice is the replacement by a revision implant. The aim of osteosynthesis of periprosthetic femoral fractures is a stable fixation with soft tissue preservation which results in faster union allowing the patient to return to pre-injury activities. Biomechanical studies on cadavers or on synthetic models and computer simulations make it possible to evaluate the fixation strength in various types of implants in dependence on fracture characteristics and bone quality, but cannot be substituted for clinical trials since there is no direct proportion between fixation rigidity and fracture union. Fundamental principles that shall be followed in osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures can be deduced from the available studies. Proximal fixation by screws or a combination of screws and cables are biomechanically more advantageous than the Ogden fixation by cerclage wires or cables. Bicortical fixation enabled by state-of-the-art implants of LAP-LCP or NCB type represents a significantly more stable construction compared to monocortical fixation and led to reduced use of structural allografts. Better stability can be achieved by "double plating" technique which is applied especially in revision surgeries, but also in osteoporotic periprosthetic fractures with a defect zone. In these cases, osteosynthesis with long plates is recommended, bridging the entire femur, i.e. distally with femoral condyles fixation since this prevents the risk of a fracture below the plate. In shorter plates, this risk created by stress concentration at the end screw is amplified when a distal bicortical locking screw is used. That is why it is beneficial to reduce this stress by a monocortical screw or with the use of a conventional screw. Adherence to the principles regarding the position, type and number of screws constitutes the key parameter of successful osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures. Key words: hip joint, arthroplasty, periprosthetic fractures, biomechanics of osteosynthesis.

Ortopedicko traumatologická klinika 3 lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady Praha

Biomechanics of Osteosynthesis in Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

000      

00000naa a2200000 a 4500

001      

bmc20017799

003      

CZ-PrNML

005      

20210211140229.0

007      

ta

008      

201110s2020 xr f 000 0|cze||

009      

AR

035    __

$a (PubMed)33146597

040    __

$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2

041    0_

$a cze $b eng

044    __

$a xr

100    1_

$a Skála-Rosenbaum, Jiří $7 xx0061349 $u Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha

245    10

$a Biomechanika osteosyntézy periprotetických zlomenin femuru po aloplastice kyčelního kloubu / $c J. Skála-Rosenbaum, V. Džupa, M. Krbec

246    31

$a Biomechanics of Osteosynthesis in Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

520    9_

$a Periprosthetic femoral fractures around the femoral stem of a hip prosthesis constitute a serious challenge. The number of these fractures, associated with a high failure rate and a high number of overall complications, including higher mortality, has been on an increase worldwide. Stable femoral stems are indicated for osteosynthesis, while in case of loosening the method of choice is the replacement by a revision implant. The aim of osteosynthesis of periprosthetic femoral fractures is a stable fixation with soft tissue preservation which results in faster union allowing the patient to return to pre-injury activities. Biomechanical studies on cadavers or on synthetic models and computer simulations make it possible to evaluate the fixation strength in various types of implants in dependence on fracture characteristics and bone quality, but cannot be substituted for clinical trials since there is no direct proportion between fixation rigidity and fracture union. Fundamental principles that shall be followed in osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures can be deduced from the available studies. Proximal fixation by screws or a combination of screws and cables are biomechanically more advantageous than the Ogden fixation by cerclage wires or cables. Bicortical fixation enabled by state-of-the-art implants of LAP-LCP or NCB type represents a significantly more stable construction compared to monocortical fixation and led to reduced use of structural allografts. Better stability can be achieved by "double plating" technique which is applied especially in revision surgeries, but also in osteoporotic periprosthetic fractures with a defect zone. In these cases, osteosynthesis with long plates is recommended, bridging the entire femur, i.e. distally with femoral condyles fixation since this prevents the risk of a fracture below the plate. In shorter plates, this risk created by stress concentration at the end screw is amplified when a distal bicortical locking screw is used. That is why it is beneficial to reduce this stress by a monocortical screw or with the use of a conventional screw. Adherence to the principles regarding the position, type and number of screws constitutes the key parameter of successful osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures. Key words: hip joint, arthroplasty, periprosthetic fractures, biomechanics of osteosynthesis.

650    12

$a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019644

650    _2

$a kostní destičky $7 D001860

650    _2

$a kostní šrouby $7 D001863

650    12

$a fraktury femuru $x chirurgie $7 D005264

650    _2

$a vnitřní fixace fraktury $7 D005593

650    _2

$a lidé $7 D006801

650    12

$a periprotetické fraktury $x chirurgie $7 D057068

655    _2

$a časopisecké články $7 D016428

700    1_

$a Džupa, Valér, $d 1962- $7 pna2005262027 $u Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha

700    1_

$a Krbec, Martin, $d 1956- $7 pna2005280873 $u Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha

773    0_

$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 87, č. 5 (2020), s. 309-317

856    41

$u https://achot.cz/pdfs/ach/2020/05/01.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný

910    __

$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0

990    __

$a 20201110 $b ABA008

991    __

$a 20210209175935 $b ABA008

999    __

$a ok $b bmc $g 1619871 $s 1107991

BAS    __

$a 3

BAS    __

$a PreBMC

BMC    __

$a 2020 $b 87 $c 5 $d 309-317 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021

LZP    __

$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20201110