-
Something wrong with this record ?
Dissociating Profiles of Social Cognitive Disturbances Between Mixed Personality and Anxiety Disorder
K. Czekóová, DJ. Shaw, Z. Pokorná, M. Brázdil,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2010
Free Medical Journals
from 2010
PubMed Central
from 2010
Europe PubMed Central
from 2010
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Background: An emerging body of research has begun to elucidate disturbances to social cognition in specific personality disorders (PDs). No research has been conducted on patients with Mixed Personality Disorder (MPD), however, who meet multiple diagnostic criteria. Further, very few studies have compared social cognition between patients with PD and those presenting with symptomatic diagnoses that co-occur with personality pathologies, such as anxiety disorder (AD). The aim of this study was to provide a detailed characterization of deficits to various aspects of social cognition in MPD and dissociate impairments specific to MPD from those exhibited by patients with AD who differ in the severity of personality pathology. Method: Building on our previous research, we administered a large battery of self-report and performance-based measures of social cognition to age-, sex- and education-matched groups of patients with MPD or AD, and healthy control participants (HCs; n = 29, 23, and 54, respectively). This permitted a detailed profiling of these clinical groups according to impairments in emotion recognition and regulation, imitative control, low-level visual perspective taking, and empathic awareness and expression. Results: The MPD group demonstrated poorer emotion recognition for negative facial expressions relative to both HCs and AD. Compared with HCs, both clinical groups also performed significantly worse in visual perspective taking and interference resolution, and reported higher personal distress when empathizing and more state-oriented emotion regulation. Conclusion: We interpret our results to reflect dysfunctional cognitive control that is common to patients with both MPD and AD. Given the patterns of affective dispositions that characterize these two diagnostic groups, we suggest that prolonged negative affectivity is associated with inflexible styles of emotion regulation and attribution. This might potentiate the interpersonal dysfunction exhibited in MPD, particularly in negatively valenced and challenging social situations.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20019420
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201123123333.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201103s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00563 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32273867
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Czekóová, Kristína $u Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
- 245 10
- $a Dissociating Profiles of Social Cognitive Disturbances Between Mixed Personality and Anxiety Disorder / $c K. Czekóová, DJ. Shaw, Z. Pokorná, M. Brázdil,
- 520 9_
- $a Background: An emerging body of research has begun to elucidate disturbances to social cognition in specific personality disorders (PDs). No research has been conducted on patients with Mixed Personality Disorder (MPD), however, who meet multiple diagnostic criteria. Further, very few studies have compared social cognition between patients with PD and those presenting with symptomatic diagnoses that co-occur with personality pathologies, such as anxiety disorder (AD). The aim of this study was to provide a detailed characterization of deficits to various aspects of social cognition in MPD and dissociate impairments specific to MPD from those exhibited by patients with AD who differ in the severity of personality pathology. Method: Building on our previous research, we administered a large battery of self-report and performance-based measures of social cognition to age-, sex- and education-matched groups of patients with MPD or AD, and healthy control participants (HCs; n = 29, 23, and 54, respectively). This permitted a detailed profiling of these clinical groups according to impairments in emotion recognition and regulation, imitative control, low-level visual perspective taking, and empathic awareness and expression. Results: The MPD group demonstrated poorer emotion recognition for negative facial expressions relative to both HCs and AD. Compared with HCs, both clinical groups also performed significantly worse in visual perspective taking and interference resolution, and reported higher personal distress when empathizing and more state-oriented emotion regulation. Conclusion: We interpret our results to reflect dysfunctional cognitive control that is common to patients with both MPD and AD. Given the patterns of affective dispositions that characterize these two diagnostic groups, we suggest that prolonged negative affectivity is associated with inflexible styles of emotion regulation and attribution. This might potentiate the interpersonal dysfunction exhibited in MPD, particularly in negatively valenced and challenging social situations.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Shaw, Daniel Joel $u Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Department of Psychology, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
- 700 1_
- $a Pokorná, Zuzana $u Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno and University Hospital, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Brázdil, Milan $u Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 11, č. - (2020), s. 563
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32273867 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201123123332 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1586197 $s 1109618
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 11 $c - $d 563 $e 20200326 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201103