Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Dissociating Profiles of Social Cognitive Disturbances Between Mixed Personality and Anxiety Disorder

K. Czekóová, DJ. Shaw, Z. Pokorná, M. Brázdil,

. 2020 ; 11 (-) : 563. [pub] 20200326

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Background: An emerging body of research has begun to elucidate disturbances to social cognition in specific personality disorders (PDs). No research has been conducted on patients with Mixed Personality Disorder (MPD), however, who meet multiple diagnostic criteria. Further, very few studies have compared social cognition between patients with PD and those presenting with symptomatic diagnoses that co-occur with personality pathologies, such as anxiety disorder (AD). The aim of this study was to provide a detailed characterization of deficits to various aspects of social cognition in MPD and dissociate impairments specific to MPD from those exhibited by patients with AD who differ in the severity of personality pathology. Method: Building on our previous research, we administered a large battery of self-report and performance-based measures of social cognition to age-, sex- and education-matched groups of patients with MPD or AD, and healthy control participants (HCs; n = 29, 23, and 54, respectively). This permitted a detailed profiling of these clinical groups according to impairments in emotion recognition and regulation, imitative control, low-level visual perspective taking, and empathic awareness and expression. Results: The MPD group demonstrated poorer emotion recognition for negative facial expressions relative to both HCs and AD. Compared with HCs, both clinical groups also performed significantly worse in visual perspective taking and interference resolution, and reported higher personal distress when empathizing and more state-oriented emotion regulation. Conclusion: We interpret our results to reflect dysfunctional cognitive control that is common to patients with both MPD and AD. Given the patterns of affective dispositions that characterize these two diagnostic groups, we suggest that prolonged negative affectivity is associated with inflexible styles of emotion regulation and attribution. This might potentiate the interpersonal dysfunction exhibited in MPD, particularly in negatively valenced and challenging social situations.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20019420
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201123123333.0
007      
ta
008      
201103s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00563 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32273867
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Czekóová, Kristína $u Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
245    10
$a Dissociating Profiles of Social Cognitive Disturbances Between Mixed Personality and Anxiety Disorder / $c K. Czekóová, DJ. Shaw, Z. Pokorná, M. Brázdil,
520    9_
$a Background: An emerging body of research has begun to elucidate disturbances to social cognition in specific personality disorders (PDs). No research has been conducted on patients with Mixed Personality Disorder (MPD), however, who meet multiple diagnostic criteria. Further, very few studies have compared social cognition between patients with PD and those presenting with symptomatic diagnoses that co-occur with personality pathologies, such as anxiety disorder (AD). The aim of this study was to provide a detailed characterization of deficits to various aspects of social cognition in MPD and dissociate impairments specific to MPD from those exhibited by patients with AD who differ in the severity of personality pathology. Method: Building on our previous research, we administered a large battery of self-report and performance-based measures of social cognition to age-, sex- and education-matched groups of patients with MPD or AD, and healthy control participants (HCs; n = 29, 23, and 54, respectively). This permitted a detailed profiling of these clinical groups according to impairments in emotion recognition and regulation, imitative control, low-level visual perspective taking, and empathic awareness and expression. Results: The MPD group demonstrated poorer emotion recognition for negative facial expressions relative to both HCs and AD. Compared with HCs, both clinical groups also performed significantly worse in visual perspective taking and interference resolution, and reported higher personal distress when empathizing and more state-oriented emotion regulation. Conclusion: We interpret our results to reflect dysfunctional cognitive control that is common to patients with both MPD and AD. Given the patterns of affective dispositions that characterize these two diagnostic groups, we suggest that prolonged negative affectivity is associated with inflexible styles of emotion regulation and attribution. This might potentiate the interpersonal dysfunction exhibited in MPD, particularly in negatively valenced and challenging social situations.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Shaw, Daniel Joel $u Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Department of Psychology, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Pokorná, Zuzana $u Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno and University Hospital, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Brázdil, Milan $u Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
773    0_
$w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 11, č. - (2020), s. 563
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32273867 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201103 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201123123332 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1586197 $s 1109618
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 11 $c - $d 563 $e 20200326 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201103

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...