-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Semi-supervised Training Data Selection Improves Seizure Forecasting in Canines with Epilepsy
M. Nasseri, V. Kremen, P. Nejedly, I. Kim, SY. Chang, H. Joon Jo, H. Guragain, N. Nelson, E. Patterson, BK. Sturges, CM. Crowe, T. Denison, BH. Brinkmann, GA. Worrell,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
R01 NS078136
NINDS NIH HHS - United States
R01 NS092882
NINDS NIH HHS - United States
UH2 NS095495
NINDS NIH HHS - United States
UH3 NS095495
NINDS NIH HHS - United States
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Objective: Conventional selection of pre-ictal EEG epochs for seizure prediction algorithm training data typically assumes a continuous pre-ictal brain state preceding a seizure. This is carried out by defining a fixed duration, pre-ictal time period before seizures from which pre-ictal training data epochs are uniformly sampled. However, stochastic physiological and pathological fluctuations in EEG data characteristics and underlying brain states suggest that pre-ictal state dynamics may be more complex, and selection of pre-ictal training data segments to reflect this could improve algorithm performance. Methods: We propose a semi-supervised technique to select pre-ictal training data most distinguishable from interictal EEG according to pre-specified data characteristics. The proposed method uses hierarchical clustering to identify optimal pre-ictal data epochs. Results: In this paper we compare the performance of a seizure forecasting algorithm with and without hierarchical clustering of pre-ictal periods in chronic iEEG recordings from six canines with naturally occurring epilepsy. Hierarchical clustering of training data improved results for Time In Warning (TIW) (0.18 vs. 0.23) and False Positive Rate (FPR) (0.5 vs. 0.59) when evaluated across all subjects (p<0.001, n=6). Results were mixed when evaluating TIW, FPR, and Sensitivity for individual dogs. Conclusion: Hierarchical clustering is a helpful method for training data selection overall, but should be evaluated on a subject-wise basis. Significance: The clustering method can be used to optimize results of forecasting towards sensitivity or TIW or FPR, and therefore can be useful for epilepsy management.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford Oxford OX3 7DQ UK
Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory Department of Neurology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital University of California at Davis Davis CA 95616 USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20022128
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201204093824.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101743 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32863855
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Nasseri, Mona $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 245 10
- $a Semi-supervised Training Data Selection Improves Seizure Forecasting in Canines with Epilepsy / $c M. Nasseri, V. Kremen, P. Nejedly, I. Kim, SY. Chang, H. Joon Jo, H. Guragain, N. Nelson, E. Patterson, BK. Sturges, CM. Crowe, T. Denison, BH. Brinkmann, GA. Worrell,
- 520 9_
- $a Objective: Conventional selection of pre-ictal EEG epochs for seizure prediction algorithm training data typically assumes a continuous pre-ictal brain state preceding a seizure. This is carried out by defining a fixed duration, pre-ictal time period before seizures from which pre-ictal training data epochs are uniformly sampled. However, stochastic physiological and pathological fluctuations in EEG data characteristics and underlying brain states suggest that pre-ictal state dynamics may be more complex, and selection of pre-ictal training data segments to reflect this could improve algorithm performance. Methods: We propose a semi-supervised technique to select pre-ictal training data most distinguishable from interictal EEG according to pre-specified data characteristics. The proposed method uses hierarchical clustering to identify optimal pre-ictal data epochs. Results: In this paper we compare the performance of a seizure forecasting algorithm with and without hierarchical clustering of pre-ictal periods in chronic iEEG recordings from six canines with naturally occurring epilepsy. Hierarchical clustering of training data improved results for Time In Warning (TIW) (0.18 vs. 0.23) and False Positive Rate (FPR) (0.5 vs. 0.59) when evaluated across all subjects (p<0.001, n=6). Results were mixed when evaluating TIW, FPR, and Sensitivity for individual dogs. Conclusion: Hierarchical clustering is a helpful method for training data selection overall, but should be evaluated on a subject-wise basis. Significance: The clustering method can be used to optimize results of forecasting towards sensitivity or TIW or FPR, and therefore can be useful for epilepsy management.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kremen, Vaclav $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Nejedly, Petr $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Kim, Inyong $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Chang, Su-Youne $u Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Joon Jo, Hang $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Guragain, Hari $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Nelson, Nathaniel $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Patterson, Edward $u Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Sturges, Beverly K $u Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Crowe, Chelsea M $u Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Denison, Tim $u Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Brinkmann, Benjamin H $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Worrell, Gregory A $u Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166621 $t Biomedical signal processing and control $x 1746-8094 $g Roč. 57, č. - (2020)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32863855 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201204093821 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1591835 $s 1112800
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 57 $c - $e 20191114 $i 1746-8094 $m Biomedical signal processing control $n Biomed Signal Process Control $x MED00166621
- GRA __
- $a R01 NS078136 $p NINDS NIH HHS $2 United States
- GRA __
- $a R01 NS092882 $p NINDS NIH HHS $2 United States
- GRA __
- $a UH2 NS095495 $p NINDS NIH HHS $2 United States
- GRA __
- $a UH3 NS095495 $p NINDS NIH HHS $2 United States
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125