-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Seed dispersal and realized gene flow of two forest orchids in a fragmented landscape
M. Kotilínek, T. Těšitelová, J. Košnar, P. Fibich, L. Hemrová, P. Koutecký, Z. Münzbergová, J. Jersáková,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
31-14-21432S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
31-14-21432S
Czech Science Foundation
PubMed
32056355
DOI
10.1111/plb.13099
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- ekosystém * MeSH
- Orchidaceae * genetika MeSH
- šíření semen * MeSH
- tok genů * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Species with vast production of dust-like windborne seeds, such as orchids, should not be limited by seed dispersal. This paradigm, however, does not fit recent studies showing that many sites suitable for orchids are unoccupied and most seeds land close to their maternal plant. To explore this issue, we studied seed dispersal and gene flow of two forest orchid species, Epipactis atrorubens and Cephalanthera rubra, growing in a fragmented landscape of forested limestone hills in southwest Bohemia, Czech Republic. We used a combination of seed trapping and plant genotyping methods (microsatellite DNA markers) to quantify short- and long-distance dispersal, respectively. In addition, seed production of both species was estimated. We found that most seeds landed very close to maternal plants (95% of captured seeds were within 7.2 m) in both species, and dispersal distance was influenced by forest type in E. atrorubens. In addition, C. rubra showed clonal reproduction (20% of plants were of clonal origin) and very low fruiting success (only 1.6% of plants were fruiting) in comparison with E. atrorubens (25.7%). Gene flow was frequent up to 2 km in C. rubra and up to 125 km in E. atrorubens, and we detected a relatively high dispersal rate among regions in both species. Although both species occupy similar habitats and have similar seed dispersal abilities, C. rubra is notably rarer in the study area. Considerably low fruiting success in this species likely limits its gene flow to longer distances and designates it more sensitive to habitat loss and fragmentation.
Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czech Republic
Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023061
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214125218.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/plb.13099 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32056355
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Kotilínek, M $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Seed dispersal and realized gene flow of two forest orchids in a fragmented landscape / $c M. Kotilínek, T. Těšitelová, J. Košnar, P. Fibich, L. Hemrová, P. Koutecký, Z. Münzbergová, J. Jersáková,
- 520 9_
- $a Species with vast production of dust-like windborne seeds, such as orchids, should not be limited by seed dispersal. This paradigm, however, does not fit recent studies showing that many sites suitable for orchids are unoccupied and most seeds land close to their maternal plant. To explore this issue, we studied seed dispersal and gene flow of two forest orchid species, Epipactis atrorubens and Cephalanthera rubra, growing in a fragmented landscape of forested limestone hills in southwest Bohemia, Czech Republic. We used a combination of seed trapping and plant genotyping methods (microsatellite DNA markers) to quantify short- and long-distance dispersal, respectively. In addition, seed production of both species was estimated. We found that most seeds landed very close to maternal plants (95% of captured seeds were within 7.2 m) in both species, and dispersal distance was influenced by forest type in E. atrorubens. In addition, C. rubra showed clonal reproduction (20% of plants were of clonal origin) and very low fruiting success (only 1.6% of plants were fruiting) in comparison with E. atrorubens (25.7%). Gene flow was frequent up to 2 km in C. rubra and up to 125 km in E. atrorubens, and we detected a relatively high dispersal rate among regions in both species. Although both species occupy similar habitats and have similar seed dispersal abilities, C. rubra is notably rarer in the study area. Considerably low fruiting success in this species likely limits its gene flow to longer distances and designates it more sensitive to habitat loss and fragmentation.
- 650 12
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 12
- $a tok genů $7 D051456
- 650 12
- $a Orchidaceae $x genetika $7 D029595
- 650 12
- $a šíření semen $7 D058614
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Těšitelová, T $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Košnar, J $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fibich, P $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hemrová, L $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Koutecký, P $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Münzbergová, Z $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jersáková, J $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181060 $t Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) $x 1438-8677 $g Roč. 22, č. 3 (2020), s. 522-532
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32056355 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214125218 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1595380 $s 1113737
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 22 $c 3 $d 522-532 $e 20200312 $i 1438-8677 $m Plant biology $n Plant Biol (Stuttg) $x MED00181060
- GRA __
- $a 31-14-21432S $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky
- GRA __
- $a 31-14-21432S $p Czech Science Foundation
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125