Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Propensity Score Weighting Using Overlap Weights: A New Method Applied to Regorafenib Clinical Data and a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

T. Mlcoch, T. Hrnciarova, J. Tuzil, J. Zadak, M. Marian, T. Dolezal,

. 2019 ; 22 (12) : 1370-1377. [pub] 20190820

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023454

BACKGROUND: In situations of markedly different population characteristics and weak population overlap, inverse propensity score (PS) weights suffer from extreme values. The new propensity score weighting method using overlap weights (PSOW) overcomes this limitation by estimating the overlap population at the point of highest mutual overlap, thus may be preferred to other balancing methods (trimming, target, or inverse weights) in some situations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of PSOW with regorafenib effectiveness data from previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer based on the Czech national registry data (regorafenib) and a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) (placebo). The second goal was to assess the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib versus placebo. METHODS: Individual data on progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS) were balanced via PSOW for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, number of treatment lines, metastatic colorectal cancer location, KRAS mutation, and time from metastases estimated using logistic regression. The weighted Kaplan-Meier PFS/OS curves were used in a 3-state partitioned survival model. The R code is provided. RESULTS: In comparison with target or inverse PS weights, PSOW showed remarkable performance measured by effective sample size and PS weight distribution or extreme weights despite the weak overlap between the registry and RCT. In the registry or RCT cohort, regorafenib provided better survival compared with the RCT. The new PSOW hazard ratio for OS was 0.53 (RCT: 0.79), which is conservative compared with inverse or target weights with a hazard ratio of 0.44 and 0.27, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first use of PSOW for clinical data and cost-effectiveness analysis. It is promising in cases of weak or small population overlap and makes pharmacoeconomic modeling, in such cases, feasible.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023454
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214130100.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.010 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31806193
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Mlcoch, Tomas $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: tomas.mlcoch@valueoutcomes.cz.
245    10
$a Propensity Score Weighting Using Overlap Weights: A New Method Applied to Regorafenib Clinical Data and a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis / $c T. Mlcoch, T. Hrnciarova, J. Tuzil, J. Zadak, M. Marian, T. Dolezal,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: In situations of markedly different population characteristics and weak population overlap, inverse propensity score (PS) weights suffer from extreme values. The new propensity score weighting method using overlap weights (PSOW) overcomes this limitation by estimating the overlap population at the point of highest mutual overlap, thus may be preferred to other balancing methods (trimming, target, or inverse weights) in some situations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of PSOW with regorafenib effectiveness data from previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer based on the Czech national registry data (regorafenib) and a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) (placebo). The second goal was to assess the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib versus placebo. METHODS: Individual data on progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS) were balanced via PSOW for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, number of treatment lines, metastatic colorectal cancer location, KRAS mutation, and time from metastases estimated using logistic regression. The weighted Kaplan-Meier PFS/OS curves were used in a 3-state partitioned survival model. The R code is provided. RESULTS: In comparison with target or inverse PS weights, PSOW showed remarkable performance measured by effective sample size and PS weight distribution or extreme weights despite the weak overlap between the registry and RCT. In the registry or RCT cohort, regorafenib provided better survival compared with the RCT. The new PSOW hazard ratio for OS was 0.53 (RCT: 0.79), which is conservative compared with inverse or target weights with a hazard ratio of 0.44 and 0.27, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first use of PSOW for clinical data and cost-effectiveness analysis. It is promising in cases of weak or small population overlap and makes pharmacoeconomic modeling, in such cases, feasible.
650    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze III jako téma $7 D017326
650    _2
$a kolorektální nádory $x farmakoterapie $x ekonomika $x mortalita $7 D015179
650    _2
$a analýza nákladů a výnosů $7 D003362
650    _2
$a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a fenylmočovinové sloučeniny $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D010671
650    _2
$a doba přežití bez progrese choroby $7 D000077982
650    12
$a tendenční skóre $7 D057216
650    _2
$a pyridiny $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D011725
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
650    _2
$a registrace $7 D012042
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hrnciarova, Tereza $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic; First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tuzil, Jan $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic; First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zadak, Jakub $u Bayer, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Marian, Marisca $u Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Dolezal, Tomas $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Department of Pharmacology, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00007383 $t Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research $x 1524-4733 $g Roč. 22, č. 12 (2019), s. 1370-1377
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31806193 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214130059 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595773 $s 1114130
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 22 $c 12 $d 1370-1377 $e 20190820 $i 1524-4733 $m Value in health $n Value Health $x MED00007383
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...