-
Something wrong with this record ?
In-hive variation of the gut microbial composition of honey bee larvae and pupae from the same oviposition time
Z. Hroncova, J. Killer, J. Hakl, D. Titera, J. Havlik,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 2001
PubMed Central
from 2001
Europe PubMed Central
from 2001
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-02-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- Bacteria classification genetics isolation & purification MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Phylogeny MeSH
- Oviposition * MeSH
- Pupa anatomy & histology microbiology MeSH
- Larva anatomy & histology microbiology MeSH
- Microbiota MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, DNA methods MeSH
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome MeSH
- Bees anatomy & histology microbiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of microbiota composition, persistence, and transmission as well as the overall function of the bacterial community is important and may be linked to honey bee health. This study aimed to investigate the inter-individual variation in the gut microbiota in honey bee larvae and pupae. RESULTS: Individual larvae differed in the composition of major bacterial groups. In the majority of 5th instar bees, Firmicutes showed predominance (70%); however, after larval defecation and during pupation, the abundance decreased to 40%, in favour of Gammaproteobacteria. The 5th instar larvae hosted significantly more (P < 0.001) Firmicutes than black pupae. Power calculations revealed that 11 and 18 replicate-individuals, respectively, were required for the detection of significant differences (P < 0.05) in the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes abundance between stages, while higher numbers of replicates were required for Actinobacteria (478 replicates) and Gammaproteobacteria (111 replicates). CONCLUSIONS: Although sample processing and extraction protocols may have had a significant influence, sampling is very important for studying the bee microbiome, and the importance of the number of individuals pooled in samples used for microbiome studies should not be underestimated.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023936
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210125130123.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12866-019-1490-y $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31126234
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Hroncova, Zuzana $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka, 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Genetics and Breeding of Farm Animals, Institute of Animal Science, Pratelstvi, 815, 104 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a In-hive variation of the gut microbial composition of honey bee larvae and pupae from the same oviposition time / $c Z. Hroncova, J. Killer, J. Hakl, D. Titera, J. Havlik,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Knowledge of microbiota composition, persistence, and transmission as well as the overall function of the bacterial community is important and may be linked to honey bee health. This study aimed to investigate the inter-individual variation in the gut microbiota in honey bee larvae and pupae. RESULTS: Individual larvae differed in the composition of major bacterial groups. In the majority of 5th instar bees, Firmicutes showed predominance (70%); however, after larval defecation and during pupation, the abundance decreased to 40%, in favour of Gammaproteobacteria. The 5th instar larvae hosted significantly more (P < 0.001) Firmicutes than black pupae. Power calculations revealed that 11 and 18 replicate-individuals, respectively, were required for the detection of significant differences (P < 0.05) in the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes abundance between stages, while higher numbers of replicates were required for Actinobacteria (478 replicates) and Gammaproteobacteria (111 replicates). CONCLUSIONS: Although sample processing and extraction protocols may have had a significant influence, sampling is very important for studying the bee microbiome, and the importance of the number of individuals pooled in samples used for microbiome studies should not be underestimated.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
- 650 _2
- $a včely $x anatomie a histologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D001516
- 650 _2
- $a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
- 650 _2
- $a larva $x anatomie a histologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D007814
- 650 _2
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 12
- $a kladení vajíček $7 D010058
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a kukla $x anatomie a histologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D011679
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční analýza DNA $x metody $7 D017422
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Killer, Jiri $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka, 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic. Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Videnska, 1083, 142 20, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hakl, Josef $u Department of Agroecology and Crop Production, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka, 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Titěra, Dalibor, $d 1955- $u Bee Research Institute, Dol 94, 252 66, Libcice nad Vltavou, Czech Republic. Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 mzk2004235086
- 700 1_
- $a Havlik, Jaroslav $u Department of Food Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic. havlik@af.czu.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008191 $t BMC microbiology $x 1471-2180 $g Roč. 19, č. 1 (2019), s. 110
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31126234 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210125130121 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1596255 $s 1114612
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 19 $c 1 $d 110 $e 20190524 $i 1471-2180 $m BMC microbiology $n BMC Microbiol $x MED00008191
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125