-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Rhesus-minus phenotype as a predictor of sexual desire and behavior, wellbeing, mental health, and fecundity
J. Flegr, R. Kuba, R. Kopecký,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2006
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006
ProQuest Central
od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- duševní zdraví * MeSH
- fenotyp * MeSH
- fertilita * MeSH
- index tělesné hmotnosti MeSH
- krevní skupiny - systém Rh-Hr metabolismus MeSH
- libido * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- sexuální chování * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Since its discovery in the 1930s, the effects of Rh phenotype on human health and wellbeing, with the exception of the effects of Rh-negativity of a mother on the risk of hemolytic anemia of Rh-positive children, has only rarely been studied. In the last few years, however, several studies have shown that Rh-negative subjects have worse health and performance in certain tests than their Rh-positive peers. Nothing is known about the effect of Rh phenotype on the quality of life of subjects as measured by a standard instrument. METHODS: We hereby analyzed the data of 1768 male (24% Rh-negative) and 3759 female participants (23% Rh-negative) of an anonymous internet study using the partial Kendall test with the age and the population of the hometown of subjects controlled. RESULTS: The results showed that the Rh-negative women, but not men, scored worse in wellbeing measured with the WHO-BREFF. The Rh-negative men scored worse in mental health-related variables and in their reported economic situation and the Rh-negative women scored better in physical health-related variables. Both the Rh-negative men and women reported higher sexual activity than their Rh-positive peers. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of the Rh phenotype were significant after the correction for multiple tests. However, they were usually weaker and less numerous than those of smoking, consuming alcohol, and high body mass index, which were used as a sort of internal control.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20024877
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222154931.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0236134 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32687529
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Flegr, Jaroslav $u Department of Applied Neurosciences and Brain Imagination, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic. Department of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Rhesus-minus phenotype as a predictor of sexual desire and behavior, wellbeing, mental health, and fecundity / $c J. Flegr, R. Kuba, R. Kopecký,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Since its discovery in the 1930s, the effects of Rh phenotype on human health and wellbeing, with the exception of the effects of Rh-negativity of a mother on the risk of hemolytic anemia of Rh-positive children, has only rarely been studied. In the last few years, however, several studies have shown that Rh-negative subjects have worse health and performance in certain tests than their Rh-positive peers. Nothing is known about the effect of Rh phenotype on the quality of life of subjects as measured by a standard instrument. METHODS: We hereby analyzed the data of 1768 male (24% Rh-negative) and 3759 female participants (23% Rh-negative) of an anonymous internet study using the partial Kendall test with the age and the population of the hometown of subjects controlled. RESULTS: The results showed that the Rh-negative women, but not men, scored worse in wellbeing measured with the WHO-BREFF. The Rh-negative men scored worse in mental health-related variables and in their reported economic situation and the Rh-negative women scored better in physical health-related variables. Both the Rh-negative men and women reported higher sexual activity than their Rh-positive peers. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of the Rh phenotype were significant after the correction for multiple tests. However, they were usually weaker and less numerous than those of smoking, consuming alcohol, and high body mass index, which were used as a sort of internal control.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a fertilita $7 D005298
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a libido $7 D007989
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a duševní zdraví $7 D008603
- 650 12
- $a fenotyp $7 D010641
- 650 _2
- $a krevní skupiny - systém Rh-Hr $x metabolismus $7 D012204
- 650 12
- $a sexuální chování $7 D012725
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kuba, Radim $u Department of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Teaching and Didactics of Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kopecký, Robin $u Department of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 15, č. 7 (2020), s. e0236134
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32687529 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222154927 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599022 $s 1115563
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 15 $c 7 $d e0236134 $e 20200720 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125