Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Ptolemaic political activities on the west coast of Hellenistic Asia Minor had a significant impact on the local spread of the Isiac cults: A spatial network analysis

T. Glomb, A. Mertel, Z. Pospíšil, A. Chalupa,

. 2020 ; 15 (4) : e0230733. [pub] 20200401

Language English Country United States

Document type Historical Article, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

During the reign of the first Ptolemaic kings in Egypt, mainly in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE, the Egyptian cults related to the divine couple of Isis and Sarapis (i.e. the Isiac cults) spread successfully from Egypt to ports and coastal cities of the ancient Mediterranean. The discussion on the topic of the factors involved in the process of the early spread of these cults outside Egypt is still open and, so far, the research in this area has been conducted mainly by using established historiographical methods. However, these methods are limited when dealing with the interplay among different variables involved in complex historical processes. This article aims to overcome these limits by using a quantitative spatial network analysis. The results of our previous published research, which focused on a quantitative evaluation of the impact of individual factors on the early spread of the Isiac cults across the ancient Aegean Islands, suggest that the process was promoted by military and commercial activities of the Ptolemaic dynasty, and that the Ptolemaic military operations were the most influential factor. Following these results, this article focuses on the early spread of the Isiac cults on the west coast of Hellenistic Asia Minor, i.e. the region which the Ptolemies attempted to control in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE. The statistically significant results presented in this article support the hypothesis that the Ptolemaic political engagement in Asia Minor had a positive impact on the early spread of the Isiac cults. The results also suggest that the activities of the Seleucid dynasty, a political rival of the Ptolemies, in the area of interest could have constituted an immunological factor limiting the spread of the Isiac cults further to the eastern parts of Asia Minor.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025123
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222155056.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0230733 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32236131
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Glomb, Tomáš $u Centre for the Digital Research of Religion, Department for the Study of Religions, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Ptolemaic political activities on the west coast of Hellenistic Asia Minor had a significant impact on the local spread of the Isiac cults: A spatial network analysis / $c T. Glomb, A. Mertel, Z. Pospíšil, A. Chalupa,
520    9_
$a During the reign of the first Ptolemaic kings in Egypt, mainly in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE, the Egyptian cults related to the divine couple of Isis and Sarapis (i.e. the Isiac cults) spread successfully from Egypt to ports and coastal cities of the ancient Mediterranean. The discussion on the topic of the factors involved in the process of the early spread of these cults outside Egypt is still open and, so far, the research in this area has been conducted mainly by using established historiographical methods. However, these methods are limited when dealing with the interplay among different variables involved in complex historical processes. This article aims to overcome these limits by using a quantitative spatial network analysis. The results of our previous published research, which focused on a quantitative evaluation of the impact of individual factors on the early spread of the Isiac cults across the ancient Aegean Islands, suggest that the process was promoted by military and commercial activities of the Ptolemaic dynasty, and that the Ptolemaic military operations were the most influential factor. Following these results, this article focuses on the early spread of the Isiac cults on the west coast of Hellenistic Asia Minor, i.e. the region which the Ptolemies attempted to control in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE. The statistically significant results presented in this article support the hypothesis that the Ptolemaic political engagement in Asia Minor had a positive impact on the early spread of the Isiac cults. The results also suggest that the activities of the Seleucid dynasty, a political rival of the Ptolemies, in the area of interest could have constituted an immunological factor limiting the spread of the Isiac cults further to the eastern parts of Asia Minor.
650    _2
$a archeologie $7 D001106
650    _2
$a dějiny starověku $7 D049690
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a politika $7 D011057
650    _2
$a prostorová analýza $7 D062206
650    _2
$a doprava $7 D014186
651    _2
$a Asie $7 D001208
651    _2
$a starověký Egypt $7 D000076144
655    _2
$a historické články $7 D016456
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Mertel, Adam $u Centre for the Digital Research of Religion, Department for the Study of Religions, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pospíšil, Zdeněk $u Centre for the Digital Research of Religion, Department for the Study of Religions, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Chalupa, Aleš $u Centre for the Digital Research of Religion, Department for the Study of Religions, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 15, č. 4 (2020), s. e0230733
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32236131 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222155052 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599268 $s 1115809
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 15 $c 4 $d e0230733 $e 20200401 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...