• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Object categorization by wild-ranging birds in nest defence

N. Nováková, P. Veselý, R. Fuchs,

. 2020 ; 23 (1) : 203-213. [pub] 20191128

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20025280

Grantová podpora
151/2016/P Jihočeská Univerzita v Českých Budějovicích

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1998-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2003-06-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1998-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 1998-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals od 1998-07-01

Despite object categorization being an important ability for the survival of wild animals, the principles behind this ability have been only scarcely studied using wild-ranging, untrained animals. Reiterating our previous study undertaken with wild-ranging titmice on winter feeders (Nováková et al. Behav Process 143:7-12, 2017), we aimed to test two hypotheses of object recognition proposed by animal psychology studies: the particulate feature theory and recognition by components in the methodological paradigm of nest defence. We tested whether the parents of the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) recognize the dummies of the common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus), which is a potential predator of large chicks or fledglings, as a threat in case when their body parts are scrambled. The kestrel dummy was presented with the head at the top, in the middle, and at the bottom of the body. We showed that the shrikes did not consider dummies of a kestrel with an inappropriately placed head as a threat to the nest and attacked it equally scarcely as the harmless control. These results support the theory of recognition by components, presuming that the mutual position of body parts is essential for appropriate recognition of the object. When the body parts were scrambled, most of shrikes were not able to identify the kestrel in such an object despite all local features (eye, beak, colouration, and claws) being present. Nevertheless, shrikes did not consider the scrambled dummies as completely harmless, because they fed their chicks in their presence significantly less often than in the presence of harmless control.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025280
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222160138.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10071-019-01329-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31781884
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Nováková, Nela $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. nelak.gero@seznam.cz.
245    10
$a Object categorization by wild-ranging birds in nest defence / $c N. Nováková, P. Veselý, R. Fuchs,
520    9_
$a Despite object categorization being an important ability for the survival of wild animals, the principles behind this ability have been only scarcely studied using wild-ranging, untrained animals. Reiterating our previous study undertaken with wild-ranging titmice on winter feeders (Nováková et al. Behav Process 143:7-12, 2017), we aimed to test two hypotheses of object recognition proposed by animal psychology studies: the particulate feature theory and recognition by components in the methodological paradigm of nest defence. We tested whether the parents of the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) recognize the dummies of the common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus), which is a potential predator of large chicks or fledglings, as a threat in case when their body parts are scrambled. The kestrel dummy was presented with the head at the top, in the middle, and at the bottom of the body. We showed that the shrikes did not consider dummies of a kestrel with an inappropriately placed head as a threat to the nest and attacked it equally scarcely as the harmless control. These results support the theory of recognition by components, presuming that the mutual position of body parts is essential for appropriate recognition of the object. When the body parts were scrambled, most of shrikes were not able to identify the kestrel in such an object despite all local features (eye, beak, colouration, and claws) being present. Nevertheless, shrikes did not consider the scrambled dummies as completely harmless, because they fed their chicks in their presence significantly less often than in the presence of harmless control.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a divoká zvířata $7 D000835
650    12
$a Falconiformes $7 D046093
650    12
$a Passeriformes $7 D046109
650    _2
$a rozpoznávání (psychologie) $7 D021641
650    _2
$a roční období $7 D012621
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Veselý, Petr $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fuchs, Roman $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00179774 $t Animal cognition $x 1435-9456 $g Roč. 23, č. 1 (2020), s. 203-213
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31781884 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222160134 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599425 $s 1115966
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 23 $c 1 $d 203-213 $e 20191128 $i 1435-9456 $m Animal cognition $n Anim Cogn $x MED00179774
GRA    __
$a 151/2016/P $p Jihočeská Univerzita v Českých Budějovicích
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace