• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Effects of Different Timing of Alveolar Bone Graft on Craniofacial Morphology in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

A. Brudnicki, E. Sawicka, R. Brudnicka, PS. Fudalej,

. 2020 ; 57 (1) : 105-113. [pub] 20190801

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20025291

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the timing of secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) on craniofacial morphology in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). DESIGN: Single-center retrospective assessment of consecutively treated nonsyndromic patients with complete UCLP. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients (108 males, 59 females) with complete UCLP in whom the cleft was repaired with 1-stage method at approximately 8 months of age. The age of 128 patients at SABG varied from 1.4 to 11.5 years (SABG group), while 39 patients still awaited SABG at the moment of cephalometric evaluation (no-SABG group). METHODS: Craniofacial morphology was assessed on lateral cephalograms taken at 10 years of age (standard deviation = 0.8; range: 7.5-12.3) using linear and angular measurements. T tests and regression models were made to analyze data. RESULTS: Regression models demonstrated that the effect of SABG on the craniofacial morphology was limited-cephalometric variables which were statistically significantly different between SABG and no-SABG groups showed no association with the timing of SABG when (1) age of primary repair of the cleft, (2) age of cephalometric evaluation, (3) cleft side, (4) gender, and (5) operator were controlled for. Only the length of the maxilla (Condylion-point A) was affected-1-year delay of SABG corresponded with an increase in Co-point A distance by 0.52 mm. However, adjusted R2 of the model was 0.11. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings cautiously indicate that SABG performed before 8 years of age can have limited negative effect on craniofacial morphology. Nevertheless, our results should be confirmed by cleft centers practicing alternative surgical repairs of the cleft.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025291
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222155138.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/1055665619866363 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31370693
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Brudnicki, Andrzej $u Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child (IMC), Warsaw, Poland.
245    10
$a Effects of Different Timing of Alveolar Bone Graft on Craniofacial Morphology in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate / $c A. Brudnicki, E. Sawicka, R. Brudnicka, PS. Fudalej,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the timing of secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) on craniofacial morphology in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). DESIGN: Single-center retrospective assessment of consecutively treated nonsyndromic patients with complete UCLP. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients (108 males, 59 females) with complete UCLP in whom the cleft was repaired with 1-stage method at approximately 8 months of age. The age of 128 patients at SABG varied from 1.4 to 11.5 years (SABG group), while 39 patients still awaited SABG at the moment of cephalometric evaluation (no-SABG group). METHODS: Craniofacial morphology was assessed on lateral cephalograms taken at 10 years of age (standard deviation = 0.8; range: 7.5-12.3) using linear and angular measurements. T tests and regression models were made to analyze data. RESULTS: Regression models demonstrated that the effect of SABG on the craniofacial morphology was limited-cephalometric variables which were statistically significantly different between SABG and no-SABG groups showed no association with the timing of SABG when (1) age of primary repair of the cleft, (2) age of cephalometric evaluation, (3) cleft side, (4) gender, and (5) operator were controlled for. Only the length of the maxilla (Condylion-point A) was affected-1-year delay of SABG corresponded with an increase in Co-point A distance by 0.52 mm. However, adjusted R2 of the model was 0.11. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings cautiously indicate that SABG performed before 8 years of age can have limited negative effect on craniofacial morphology. Nevertheless, our results should be confirmed by cleft centers practicing alternative surgical repairs of the cleft.
650    12
$a alveolární kostní štěp $7 D064728
650    _2
$a kefalometrie $7 D002508
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    12
$a rozštěp rtu $7 D002971
650    12
$a rozštěp patra $7 D002972
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a maxila $7 D008437
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sawicka, Ewa $u Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child (IMC), Warsaw, Poland.
700    1_
$a Brudnicka, Renata $u Department of Orthodontics, Central Military Medical Outpatient Clinic CePeLek, Warsaw, Poland.
700    1_
$a Fudalej, Piotr Stanisław $u Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001099 $t The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association $x 1545-1569 $g Roč. 57, č. 1 (2020), s. 105-113
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31370693 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222155134 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599436 $s 1115977
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 57 $c 1 $d 105-113 $e 20190801 $i 1545-1569 $m The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal $n Cleft Palate Craniofac J $x MED00001099
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...