-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effects of Different Timing of Alveolar Bone Graft on Craniofacial Morphology in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
A. Brudnicki, E. Sawicka, R. Brudnicka, PS. Fudalej,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
31370693
DOI
10.1177/1055665619866363
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- alveolární kostní štěp * MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- kefalometrie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- maxila MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rozštěp patra * MeSH
- rozštěp rtu * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the timing of secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) on craniofacial morphology in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). DESIGN: Single-center retrospective assessment of consecutively treated nonsyndromic patients with complete UCLP. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients (108 males, 59 females) with complete UCLP in whom the cleft was repaired with 1-stage method at approximately 8 months of age. The age of 128 patients at SABG varied from 1.4 to 11.5 years (SABG group), while 39 patients still awaited SABG at the moment of cephalometric evaluation (no-SABG group). METHODS: Craniofacial morphology was assessed on lateral cephalograms taken at 10 years of age (standard deviation = 0.8; range: 7.5-12.3) using linear and angular measurements. T tests and regression models were made to analyze data. RESULTS: Regression models demonstrated that the effect of SABG on the craniofacial morphology was limited-cephalometric variables which were statistically significantly different between SABG and no-SABG groups showed no association with the timing of SABG when (1) age of primary repair of the cleft, (2) age of cephalometric evaluation, (3) cleft side, (4) gender, and (5) operator were controlled for. Only the length of the maxilla (Condylion-point A) was affected-1-year delay of SABG corresponded with an increase in Co-point A distance by 0.52 mm. However, adjusted R2 of the model was 0.11. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings cautiously indicate that SABG performed before 8 years of age can have limited negative effect on craniofacial morphology. Nevertheless, our results should be confirmed by cleft centers practicing alternative surgical repairs of the cleft.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025291
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222155138.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/1055665619866363 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31370693
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Brudnicki, Andrzej $u Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child (IMC), Warsaw, Poland.
- 245 10
- $a Effects of Different Timing of Alveolar Bone Graft on Craniofacial Morphology in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate / $c A. Brudnicki, E. Sawicka, R. Brudnicka, PS. Fudalej,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the timing of secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) on craniofacial morphology in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). DESIGN: Single-center retrospective assessment of consecutively treated nonsyndromic patients with complete UCLP. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients (108 males, 59 females) with complete UCLP in whom the cleft was repaired with 1-stage method at approximately 8 months of age. The age of 128 patients at SABG varied from 1.4 to 11.5 years (SABG group), while 39 patients still awaited SABG at the moment of cephalometric evaluation (no-SABG group). METHODS: Craniofacial morphology was assessed on lateral cephalograms taken at 10 years of age (standard deviation = 0.8; range: 7.5-12.3) using linear and angular measurements. T tests and regression models were made to analyze data. RESULTS: Regression models demonstrated that the effect of SABG on the craniofacial morphology was limited-cephalometric variables which were statistically significantly different between SABG and no-SABG groups showed no association with the timing of SABG when (1) age of primary repair of the cleft, (2) age of cephalometric evaluation, (3) cleft side, (4) gender, and (5) operator were controlled for. Only the length of the maxilla (Condylion-point A) was affected-1-year delay of SABG corresponded with an increase in Co-point A distance by 0.52 mm. However, adjusted R2 of the model was 0.11. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings cautiously indicate that SABG performed before 8 years of age can have limited negative effect on craniofacial morphology. Nevertheless, our results should be confirmed by cleft centers practicing alternative surgical repairs of the cleft.
- 650 12
- $a alveolární kostní štěp $7 D064728
- 650 _2
- $a kefalometrie $7 D002508
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 12
- $a rozštěp rtu $7 D002971
- 650 12
- $a rozštěp patra $7 D002972
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a maxila $7 D008437
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Sawicka, Ewa $u Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child (IMC), Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Brudnicka, Renata $u Department of Orthodontics, Central Military Medical Outpatient Clinic CePeLek, Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Fudalej, Piotr Stanisław $u Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001099 $t The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association $x 1545-1569 $g Roč. 57, č. 1 (2020), s. 105-113
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31370693 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222155134 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599436 $s 1115977
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 57 $c 1 $d 105-113 $e 20190801 $i 1545-1569 $m The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal $n Cleft Palate Craniofac J $x MED00001099
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125