• Something wrong with this record ?

Succession of Microbial Decomposers Is Determined by Litter Type, but Site Conditions Drive Decomposition Rates

A. Buresova, J. Kopecky, V. Hrdinkova, Z. Kamenik, M. Omelka, M. Sagova-Mareckova,

. 2019 ; 85 (24) : . [pub] 20191127

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK Free Medical Journals from 1976 to 6 months ago
PubMed Central from 1976 to 1 year ago
Europe PubMed Central from 1976 to 6 months ago
Open Access Digital Library from 1953-01-01

Soil microorganisms are diverse, although they share functions during the decomposition of organic matter. Thus, preferences for soil conditions and litter quality were explored to understand their niche partitioning. A 1-year-long litterbag transplant experiment evaluated how soil physicochemical traits of contrasting sites combined with chemically distinct litters of sedge (S), milkvetch (M) from a grassland, and beech (B) from forest site decomposition. Litter was assessed by mass loss; C, N, and P contents; and low-molecular-weight compounds. Decomposition was described by the succession of fungi, Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Firmicutes; bacterial diversity; and extracellular enzyme activities. The M litter decomposed faster at the nutrient-poor forest site, where the extracellular enzymes were more active, but microbial decomposers were not more abundant. Actinobacteria abundance was affected by site, while Firmicutes and fungi by litter type and Alphaproteobacteria by both factors. Actinobacteria were characterized as late-stage substrate generalists, while fungi were recognized as substrate specialists and site generalists, particularly in the grassland. Overall, soil conditions determined the decomposition rates in the grassland and forest, but successional patterns of the main decomposers (fungi and Actinobacteria) were determined by litter type. These results suggest that shifts in vegetation mostly affect microbial decomposer community composition.IMPORTANCE Anthropogenic disturbance may cause shifts in vegetation and alter the litter input. We studied the decomposition of different litter types under soil conditions of a nutrient-rich grassland and nutrient-poor forest to identify factors responsible for changes in the community structure and succession of microbial decomposers. This will help to predict the consequences of induced changes on the abundance and activity of microbial decomposers and recognize if the decomposition process and resulting quality and quantity of soil organic matter will be affected at various sites.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025481
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210217095327.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1128/AEM.01760-19 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31604765
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Buresova, A $u Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Ecologie Microbienne, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
245    10
$a Succession of Microbial Decomposers Is Determined by Litter Type, but Site Conditions Drive Decomposition Rates / $c A. Buresova, J. Kopecky, V. Hrdinkova, Z. Kamenik, M. Omelka, M. Sagova-Mareckova,
520    9_
$a Soil microorganisms are diverse, although they share functions during the decomposition of organic matter. Thus, preferences for soil conditions and litter quality were explored to understand their niche partitioning. A 1-year-long litterbag transplant experiment evaluated how soil physicochemical traits of contrasting sites combined with chemically distinct litters of sedge (S), milkvetch (M) from a grassland, and beech (B) from forest site decomposition. Litter was assessed by mass loss; C, N, and P contents; and low-molecular-weight compounds. Decomposition was described by the succession of fungi, Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Firmicutes; bacterial diversity; and extracellular enzyme activities. The M litter decomposed faster at the nutrient-poor forest site, where the extracellular enzymes were more active, but microbial decomposers were not more abundant. Actinobacteria abundance was affected by site, while Firmicutes and fungi by litter type and Alphaproteobacteria by both factors. Actinobacteria were characterized as late-stage substrate generalists, while fungi were recognized as substrate specialists and site generalists, particularly in the grassland. Overall, soil conditions determined the decomposition rates in the grassland and forest, but successional patterns of the main decomposers (fungi and Actinobacteria) were determined by litter type. These results suggest that shifts in vegetation mostly affect microbial decomposer community composition.IMPORTANCE Anthropogenic disturbance may cause shifts in vegetation and alter the litter input. We studied the decomposition of different litter types under soil conditions of a nutrient-rich grassland and nutrient-poor forest to identify factors responsible for changes in the community structure and succession of microbial decomposers. This will help to predict the consequences of induced changes on the abundance and activity of microbial decomposers and recognize if the decomposition process and resulting quality and quantity of soil organic matter will be affected at various sites.
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x metabolismus $7 D001419
650    _2
$a biodiverzita $7 D044822
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a lesy $7 D065928
650    _2
$a houby $x klasifikace $x metabolismus $7 D005658
650    _2
$a pastviny $7 D065948
650    12
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a RNA ribozomální 16S $7 D012336
650    _2
$a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
650    12
$a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kopecký, Jan, $d 1966- $u Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0108100
700    1_
$a Hrdinkova, V $u Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kamenik, Z $u Laboratory for Biology of Secondary Metabolism, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Omelka, M $u Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ságová-Marečková, Markéta $u Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic marketa.sagova@gmail.com. Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Science in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0095954
773    0_
$w MED00000487 $t Applied and environmental microbiology $x 1098-5336 $g Roč. 85, č. 24 (2019)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31604765 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210217095324 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599626 $s 1116167
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 85 $c 24 $e 20191127 $i 1098-5336 $m Applied and environmental microbiology $n Appl Environ Microbiol $x MED00000487
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...