-
Something wrong with this record ?
Succession of Microbial Decomposers Is Determined by Litter Type, but Site Conditions Drive Decomposition Rates
A. Buresova, J. Kopecky, V. Hrdinkova, Z. Kamenik, M. Omelka, M. Sagova-Mareckova,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1976 to 6 months ago
PubMed Central
from 1976 to 1 year ago
Europe PubMed Central
from 1976 to 6 months ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 1953-01-01
PubMed
31604765
DOI
10.1128/aem.01760-19
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Bacteria classification metabolism MeSH
- Biodiversity MeSH
- Ecosystem MeSH
- Fungi classification metabolism MeSH
- Forests MeSH
- Microbiota * MeSH
- Grassland MeSH
- Soil chemistry MeSH
- Soil Microbiology * MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Soil microorganisms are diverse, although they share functions during the decomposition of organic matter. Thus, preferences for soil conditions and litter quality were explored to understand their niche partitioning. A 1-year-long litterbag transplant experiment evaluated how soil physicochemical traits of contrasting sites combined with chemically distinct litters of sedge (S), milkvetch (M) from a grassland, and beech (B) from forest site decomposition. Litter was assessed by mass loss; C, N, and P contents; and low-molecular-weight compounds. Decomposition was described by the succession of fungi, Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Firmicutes; bacterial diversity; and extracellular enzyme activities. The M litter decomposed faster at the nutrient-poor forest site, where the extracellular enzymes were more active, but microbial decomposers were not more abundant. Actinobacteria abundance was affected by site, while Firmicutes and fungi by litter type and Alphaproteobacteria by both factors. Actinobacteria were characterized as late-stage substrate generalists, while fungi were recognized as substrate specialists and site generalists, particularly in the grassland. Overall, soil conditions determined the decomposition rates in the grassland and forest, but successional patterns of the main decomposers (fungi and Actinobacteria) were determined by litter type. These results suggest that shifts in vegetation mostly affect microbial decomposer community composition.IMPORTANCE Anthropogenic disturbance may cause shifts in vegetation and alter the litter input. We studied the decomposition of different litter types under soil conditions of a nutrient-rich grassland and nutrient-poor forest to identify factors responsible for changes in the community structure and succession of microbial decomposers. This will help to predict the consequences of induced changes on the abundance and activity of microbial decomposers and recognize if the decomposition process and resulting quality and quantity of soil organic matter will be affected at various sites.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025481
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210217095327.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1128/AEM.01760-19 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31604765
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Buresova, A $u Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Ecologie Microbienne, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
- 245 10
- $a Succession of Microbial Decomposers Is Determined by Litter Type, but Site Conditions Drive Decomposition Rates / $c A. Buresova, J. Kopecky, V. Hrdinkova, Z. Kamenik, M. Omelka, M. Sagova-Mareckova,
- 520 9_
- $a Soil microorganisms are diverse, although they share functions during the decomposition of organic matter. Thus, preferences for soil conditions and litter quality were explored to understand their niche partitioning. A 1-year-long litterbag transplant experiment evaluated how soil physicochemical traits of contrasting sites combined with chemically distinct litters of sedge (S), milkvetch (M) from a grassland, and beech (B) from forest site decomposition. Litter was assessed by mass loss; C, N, and P contents; and low-molecular-weight compounds. Decomposition was described by the succession of fungi, Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Firmicutes; bacterial diversity; and extracellular enzyme activities. The M litter decomposed faster at the nutrient-poor forest site, where the extracellular enzymes were more active, but microbial decomposers were not more abundant. Actinobacteria abundance was affected by site, while Firmicutes and fungi by litter type and Alphaproteobacteria by both factors. Actinobacteria were characterized as late-stage substrate generalists, while fungi were recognized as substrate specialists and site generalists, particularly in the grassland. Overall, soil conditions determined the decomposition rates in the grassland and forest, but successional patterns of the main decomposers (fungi and Actinobacteria) were determined by litter type. These results suggest that shifts in vegetation mostly affect microbial decomposer community composition.IMPORTANCE Anthropogenic disturbance may cause shifts in vegetation and alter the litter input. We studied the decomposition of different litter types under soil conditions of a nutrient-rich grassland and nutrient-poor forest to identify factors responsible for changes in the community structure and succession of microbial decomposers. This will help to predict the consequences of induced changes on the abundance and activity of microbial decomposers and recognize if the decomposition process and resulting quality and quantity of soil organic matter will be affected at various sites.
- 650 _2
- $a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x metabolismus $7 D001419
- 650 _2
- $a biodiverzita $7 D044822
- 650 _2
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 _2
- $a lesy $7 D065928
- 650 _2
- $a houby $x klasifikace $x metabolismus $7 D005658
- 650 _2
- $a pastviny $7 D065948
- 650 12
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 16S $7 D012336
- 650 _2
- $a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
- 650 12
- $a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kopecký, Jan, $d 1966- $u Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0108100
- 700 1_
- $a Hrdinkova, V $u Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kamenik, Z $u Laboratory for Biology of Secondary Metabolism, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Omelka, M $u Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ságová-Marečková, Markéta $u Epidemiology and Ecology of Microorganisms, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic marketa.sagova@gmail.com. Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Science in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0095954
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000487 $t Applied and environmental microbiology $x 1098-5336 $g Roč. 85, č. 24 (2019)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31604765 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210217095324 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599626 $s 1116167
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 85 $c 24 $e 20191127 $i 1098-5336 $m Applied and environmental microbiology $n Appl Environ Microbiol $x MED00000487
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125