Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

A wolfdog point of view on the impossible task paradigm

A. Sommese, K. Nováková, NF. Šebková, L. Bartoš,

. 2019 ; 22 (6) : 1073-1083. [pub] 20190805

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
MZE-RO0719 Ministerstvo Zemědělství (CZ)

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1998-07-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2003-06-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1998-07-01 to 1 year ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest) from 1998-07-01 to 1 year ago

To elucidate the role of domestication, we used the impossible task paradigm to test Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs with a known proportion of 'wolfblood' in their DNA and, as a control group for our subjects, we used German shepherd dogs. We hypothesized that the difference between wolves and domestic dogs is based on genetics and modified by obedience; if so, the looking back performance of the subject should be linked to its proportion of wolf-genes. To prove that, we observed 73 Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs, and 27 German shepherd dogs, and analysed their human-directed gazing behaviour during our test. Our apparatus consisted of a glass container placed upside down over a small amount of food. The test proceeded with three solvable trials, in which the subject could obtain the food by manipulating the container, followed by an unsolvable one in which the container was fixed onto the board. Our results suggest that there is no significant correlation between the probability of looking back in Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs and their proportion of 'wolf blood'. However, the probability of looking back was higher in German Shepherd dogs than in Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs (odds ratio = 9.1). German Shepherd dogs showed not only a higher frequency of looking back, but also the duration of their looks was longer.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025515
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222160245.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10071-019-01298-7 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31385068
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Sommese, Andrea $u Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 00, Praha-Uhříněves, Czech Republic. sommese.andrea@gmail.com. Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 135 11, Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic. sommese.andrea@gmail.com.
245    12
$a A wolfdog point of view on the impossible task paradigm / $c A. Sommese, K. Nováková, NF. Šebková, L. Bartoš,
520    9_
$a To elucidate the role of domestication, we used the impossible task paradigm to test Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs with a known proportion of 'wolfblood' in their DNA and, as a control group for our subjects, we used German shepherd dogs. We hypothesized that the difference between wolves and domestic dogs is based on genetics and modified by obedience; if so, the looking back performance of the subject should be linked to its proportion of wolf-genes. To prove that, we observed 73 Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs, and 27 German shepherd dogs, and analysed their human-directed gazing behaviour during our test. Our apparatus consisted of a glass container placed upside down over a small amount of food. The test proceeded with three solvable trials, in which the subject could obtain the food by manipulating the container, followed by an unsolvable one in which the container was fixed onto the board. Our results suggest that there is no significant correlation between the probability of looking back in Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs and their proportion of 'wolf blood'. However, the probability of looking back was higher in German Shepherd dogs than in Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs (odds ratio = 9.1). German Shepherd dogs showed not only a higher frequency of looking back, but also the duration of their looks was longer.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a psi $7 D004285
650    _2
$a domestikace $7 D000071278
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a vlci $7 D019596
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Nováková, Kamila $u Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 135 11, Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šebková, Naděžda Fiala $u Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 135 11, Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bartoš, Luděk $u Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 00, Praha-Uhříněves, Czech Republic. Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 135 11, Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00179774 $t Animal cognition $x 1435-9456 $g Roč. 22, č. 6 (2019), s. 1073-1083
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31385068 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222160241 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599660 $s 1116201
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 22 $c 6 $d 1073-1083 $e 20190805 $i 1435-9456 $m Animal cognition $n Anim Cogn $x MED00179774
GRA    __
$a MZE-RO0719 $p Ministerstvo Zemědělství (CZ)
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...