-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Community structures and comparison of nosZ and 16S rRNA genes from culturable denitrifying bacteria
C. Avşar, ES. Aras,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
- MeSH
- Bacillus klasifikace izolace a purifikace MeSH
- Bacteria klasifikace izolace a purifikace MeSH
- bakteriální geny MeSH
- denitrifikace * MeSH
- DNA bakterií genetika MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- Gammaproteobacteria klasifikace izolace a purifikace MeSH
- mikrobiota * MeSH
- polymorfismus délky restrikčních fragmentů MeSH
- půdní mikrobiologie * MeSH
- RNA ribozomální 16S genetika MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
The objectives of this study were (i) to isolate and characterize of cultivable denitrifying bacteria using classic microbiological and molecular methods, (ii) to compare of 16S rRNA and nosZ genes as molecular markers, (iii) to determine bacterial community structure and diversity in soil samples using single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. In this study, 49 bacterial isolates were cultivated and phylogenetic analyses grouped them into two phyla: Proteobacteria (37 species) and Firmicutes (12 species). Our study showed that the nosZ functional gen could be used to identify denitrifying bacteria abundance in environment but could not be used to identify pure bacterial cultures. In addition, the bacterial community structure showed significant differences among the various soil types. Phylogenetic analysis of community structure indicated that 51 clones could be divided into 2 phylotypes. Uncultured bacteria (80.4%) and Gammaproteobacteria (19.6%) were the dominant components of the soil bacterial community. For 16S rRNA, PCR products of 49 bacteria were obtained with 27F-1492R primer pairs. For nosZ, PCR products were obtained with primers 1F-1R (259 bp), 2F-2R (267 bp), and F-1622R (453 bp) of 39 bacteria that the single nosZ band provided on the agarose gel. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene clone library was dominated by Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli. The nosZ clone sequences did not represent the bacteria from which they were obtained but were found to be closer to the environmental clones. Our study showed that the nosZ functional gene could be used to identify denitrification abundance in environment but could not be used to identify pure bacterial cultures. It was also found that the nosZ sequences showed uncultured denitrifier species.
Department of Biology Faculty of Arts and Sciences Sinop University Sinop Turkey
Department of Biology Faculty of Science Ankara University Ankara Turkey
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20027176
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210105141541.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s12223-019-00754-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31677094
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Avşar, Cumhur $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey. cumhur.avsar@gmail.com.
- 245 10
- $a Community structures and comparison of nosZ and 16S rRNA genes from culturable denitrifying bacteria / $c C. Avşar, ES. Aras,
- 520 9_
- $a The objectives of this study were (i) to isolate and characterize of cultivable denitrifying bacteria using classic microbiological and molecular methods, (ii) to compare of 16S rRNA and nosZ genes as molecular markers, (iii) to determine bacterial community structure and diversity in soil samples using single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. In this study, 49 bacterial isolates were cultivated and phylogenetic analyses grouped them into two phyla: Proteobacteria (37 species) and Firmicutes (12 species). Our study showed that the nosZ functional gen could be used to identify denitrifying bacteria abundance in environment but could not be used to identify pure bacterial cultures. In addition, the bacterial community structure showed significant differences among the various soil types. Phylogenetic analysis of community structure indicated that 51 clones could be divided into 2 phylotypes. Uncultured bacteria (80.4%) and Gammaproteobacteria (19.6%) were the dominant components of the soil bacterial community. For 16S rRNA, PCR products of 49 bacteria were obtained with 27F-1492R primer pairs. For nosZ, PCR products were obtained with primers 1F-1R (259 bp), 2F-2R (267 bp), and F-1622R (453 bp) of 39 bacteria that the single nosZ band provided on the agarose gel. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene clone library was dominated by Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli. The nosZ clone sequences did not represent the bacteria from which they were obtained but were found to be closer to the environmental clones. Our study showed that the nosZ functional gene could be used to identify denitrification abundance in environment but could not be used to identify pure bacterial cultures. It was also found that the nosZ sequences showed uncultured denitrifier species.
- 650 _2
- $a Bacillus $x klasifikace $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001407
- 650 _2
- $a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
- 650 _2
- $a DNA bakterií $x genetika $7 D004269
- 650 12
- $a denitrifikace $7 D058440
- 650 _2
- $a Gammaproteobacteria $x klasifikace $x izolace a purifikace $7 D020563
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriální geny $7 D005798
- 650 12
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a polymorfismus délky restrikčních fragmentů $7 D012150
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
- 650 12
- $a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Aras, E Sümer $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 65, č. 3 (2020), s. 497-510
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31677094 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210105141538 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1604156 $s 1117868
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 65 $c 3 $d 497-510 $e 20191101 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105