-
Something wrong with this record ?
A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis
A. Tichy, M. Brabec, P. Bradna, K. Hosaka, J. Tagami,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Data Analysis MeSH
- Dentin MeSH
- Dentin-Bonding Agents * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Tensile Strength MeSH
- Resin Cements MeSH
- Composite Resins MeSH
- Materials Testing MeSH
- Dental Bonding * MeSH
- Dental Cements MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five universal adhesives (n = 10) and subdivided according to aging conditions (24-h water storage, thermocycling). After μTBS to dentin was tested, a fractographic analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy. Survival analyses of the μTBS data were performed using both a failure mode distinguishing Weibull CR model, and a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing Weibull model. Weibull shape (m) and scale (σθ) parameters were calculated for both models using the maximum likelihood estimation method, and strength at 10 % probability of failure, σ0.10, was estimated. Groups were compared using 95 % confidence intervals. RESULTS: CR-model estimates of σθ and σ0.10 for adhesive failures were higher than those of the conventional model, more markedly in groups with lower percentages of adhesive failures. CR-model strength estimates for cohesive failures were similar in all groups regardless of their bond strengths and failure mode distributions. SIGNIFICANCE: Merging all bond-strength data into one dataset irrespective of the failure mode may result in a severe underestimation of bond strength, especially in groups with low incidence of adhesive failures. Bond-strength data analysis using a CR model could provide more accurate estimates of bond strength, and strength estimates for cohesive failures which were apparently independent of bond strength could serve as an internal validity indicator of the CR model.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20027596
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114152122.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32948331
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Tichy, Antonin $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Karlovo Namesti 32, Prague, 121 11, Czech Republic; Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan. Electronic address: antonin.tichy@lf1.cuni.cz.
- 245 12
- $a A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis / $c A. Tichy, M. Brabec, P. Bradna, K. Hosaka, J. Tagami,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five universal adhesives (n = 10) and subdivided according to aging conditions (24-h water storage, thermocycling). After μTBS to dentin was tested, a fractographic analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy. Survival analyses of the μTBS data were performed using both a failure mode distinguishing Weibull CR model, and a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing Weibull model. Weibull shape (m) and scale (σθ) parameters were calculated for both models using the maximum likelihood estimation method, and strength at 10 % probability of failure, σ0.10, was estimated. Groups were compared using 95 % confidence intervals. RESULTS: CR-model estimates of σθ and σ0.10 for adhesive failures were higher than those of the conventional model, more markedly in groups with lower percentages of adhesive failures. CR-model strength estimates for cohesive failures were similar in all groups regardless of their bond strengths and failure mode distributions. SIGNIFICANCE: Merging all bond-strength data into one dataset irrespective of the failure mode may result in a severe underestimation of bond strength, especially in groups with low incidence of adhesive failures. Bond-strength data analysis using a CR model could provide more accurate estimates of bond strength, and strength estimates for cohesive failures which were apparently independent of bond strength could serve as an internal validity indicator of the CR model.
- 650 _2
- $a složené pryskyřice $7 D003188
- 650 _2
- $a analýza dat $7 D000078332
- 650 12
- $a vazba zubní $7 D001840
- 650 _2
- $a zubní cementy $7 D003738
- 650 _2
- $a dentin $7 D003804
- 650 12
- $a dentinová adheziva $7 D017220
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a testování materiálů $7 D008422
- 650 _2
- $a pryskyřičné cementy $7 D019279
- 650 _2
- $a pevnost v tahu $7 D013718
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Brabec, Marek $u Department of Statistical Modelling, Institute of Computer Science of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Pod Vodarenskou Vezi 271/2, Prague, 182 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bradna, Pavel $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Karlovo Namesti 32, Prague, 121 11, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hosaka, Keiichi $u Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
- 700 1_
- $a Tagami, Junji $u Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001334 $t Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials $x 1879-0097 $g Roč. 36, č. 12 (2020), s. 1508-1515
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32948331 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114152120 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1607931 $s 1118776
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 36 $c 12 $d 1508-1515 $e 20200915 $i 1879-0097 $m Dental materials $n Dent Mater $x MED00001334
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105