-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The effect of wildlife carcass underreporting on KDE+ hotspots identification and importance
M. Bíl, R. Andrášik,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- databáze faktografické MeSH
- divoká zvířata * MeSH
- doprava MeSH
- dopravní nehody * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Many approaches have been developed in order to mitigate wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC), their causes and consequences. Reliable data on the amount and location of killed animals along roads are therefore necessary. The existing WVC databases are usually, however, far from complete. This data underreporting causes problems when identifying the riskiest places along a transportation infrastructure. WVC data underreporting can distort the results of WVC hotspots determination. In this work, we simulated WVC hotspots identification and stability under various rates of WVC data underreporting. Our aim was to investigate whether WVC hotspots can be found at the original locations even when data are strongly underreported. We applied the KDE + method for WVC hotspots identification. The KDE + method also allows for hotspots ranking according to cluster strength and collective risk. These two measures were then used for detection of diminishing hotspot signals with a rising level of underreporting. We found that WVC hotspots with a greater cluster strength suffered less from underreporting whereas hotspots will lower values of both cluster strength and collective risk were not detected when underreporting in the data increased. Hotspots with a cluster strength above 0.5 were almost always detected when data underreporting remained below 50%. More than 50% of these hotspots (with cluster strength above 0.5) were detectable even when underreporting rate was between 50 and 80%. We further studied the effects of both spatial and temporal underreporting. Whereas temporal change of underreporting was not a problem in hotspots detection, spatial underreporting introduced significant errors producing both false positive and false negative results (hotspots). We conclude that both researchers and practitioners should be aware of the phenomenon of underreporting and should also try to maintain the same sampling effort of spatial reporting.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20027611
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114152131.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111254 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32841791
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Bíl, Michal $u CDV - Transport Research Centre, Líšeňská 33a, 636 00, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: michal.bil@cdv.cz.
- 245 14
- $a The effect of wildlife carcass underreporting on KDE+ hotspots identification and importance / $c M. Bíl, R. Andrášik,
- 520 9_
- $a Many approaches have been developed in order to mitigate wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC), their causes and consequences. Reliable data on the amount and location of killed animals along roads are therefore necessary. The existing WVC databases are usually, however, far from complete. This data underreporting causes problems when identifying the riskiest places along a transportation infrastructure. WVC data underreporting can distort the results of WVC hotspots determination. In this work, we simulated WVC hotspots identification and stability under various rates of WVC data underreporting. Our aim was to investigate whether WVC hotspots can be found at the original locations even when data are strongly underreported. We applied the KDE + method for WVC hotspots identification. The KDE + method also allows for hotspots ranking according to cluster strength and collective risk. These two measures were then used for detection of diminishing hotspot signals with a rising level of underreporting. We found that WVC hotspots with a greater cluster strength suffered less from underreporting whereas hotspots will lower values of both cluster strength and collective risk were not detected when underreporting in the data increased. Hotspots with a cluster strength above 0.5 were almost always detected when data underreporting remained below 50%. More than 50% of these hotspots (with cluster strength above 0.5) were detectable even when underreporting rate was between 50 and 80%. We further studied the effects of both spatial and temporal underreporting. Whereas temporal change of underreporting was not a problem in hotspots detection, spatial underreporting introduced significant errors producing both false positive and false negative results (hotspots). We conclude that both researchers and practitioners should be aware of the phenomenon of underreporting and should also try to maintain the same sampling effort of spatial reporting.
- 650 12
- $a dopravní nehody $7 D000063
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a divoká zvířata $7 D000835
- 650 _2
- $a databáze faktografické $7 D016208
- 650 _2
- $a doprava $7 D014186
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Andrášik, Richard $u CDV - Transport Research Centre, Líšeňská 33a, 636 00, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: richard.andrasik@cdv.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002657 $t Journal of environmental management $x 1095-8630 $g Roč. 275, č. - (2020), s. 111254
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32841791 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114152129 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1607946 $s 1118791
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 275 $c - $d 111254 $e 20200822 $i 1095-8630 $m Journal of environmental management $n J Environ Manage $x MED00002657
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105