• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The effect of wildlife carcass underreporting on KDE+ hotspots identification and importance

M. Bíl, R. Andrášik,

. 2020 ; 275 (-) : 111254. [pub] 20200822

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20027611

Many approaches have been developed in order to mitigate wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC), their causes and consequences. Reliable data on the amount and location of killed animals along roads are therefore necessary. The existing WVC databases are usually, however, far from complete. This data underreporting causes problems when identifying the riskiest places along a transportation infrastructure. WVC data underreporting can distort the results of WVC hotspots determination. In this work, we simulated WVC hotspots identification and stability under various rates of WVC data underreporting. Our aim was to investigate whether WVC hotspots can be found at the original locations even when data are strongly underreported. We applied the KDE + method for WVC hotspots identification. The KDE + method also allows for hotspots ranking according to cluster strength and collective risk. These two measures were then used for detection of diminishing hotspot signals with a rising level of underreporting. We found that WVC hotspots with a greater cluster strength suffered less from underreporting whereas hotspots will lower values of both cluster strength and collective risk were not detected when underreporting in the data increased. Hotspots with a cluster strength above 0.5 were almost always detected when data underreporting remained below 50%. More than 50% of these hotspots (with cluster strength above 0.5) were detectable even when underreporting rate was between 50 and 80%. We further studied the effects of both spatial and temporal underreporting. Whereas temporal change of underreporting was not a problem in hotspots detection, spatial underreporting introduced significant errors producing both false positive and false negative results (hotspots). We conclude that both researchers and practitioners should be aware of the phenomenon of underreporting and should also try to maintain the same sampling effort of spatial reporting.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20027611
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114152131.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111254 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32841791
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Bíl, Michal $u CDV - Transport Research Centre, Líšeňská 33a, 636 00, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: michal.bil@cdv.cz.
245    14
$a The effect of wildlife carcass underreporting on KDE+ hotspots identification and importance / $c M. Bíl, R. Andrášik,
520    9_
$a Many approaches have been developed in order to mitigate wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC), their causes and consequences. Reliable data on the amount and location of killed animals along roads are therefore necessary. The existing WVC databases are usually, however, far from complete. This data underreporting causes problems when identifying the riskiest places along a transportation infrastructure. WVC data underreporting can distort the results of WVC hotspots determination. In this work, we simulated WVC hotspots identification and stability under various rates of WVC data underreporting. Our aim was to investigate whether WVC hotspots can be found at the original locations even when data are strongly underreported. We applied the KDE + method for WVC hotspots identification. The KDE + method also allows for hotspots ranking according to cluster strength and collective risk. These two measures were then used for detection of diminishing hotspot signals with a rising level of underreporting. We found that WVC hotspots with a greater cluster strength suffered less from underreporting whereas hotspots will lower values of both cluster strength and collective risk were not detected when underreporting in the data increased. Hotspots with a cluster strength above 0.5 were almost always detected when data underreporting remained below 50%. More than 50% of these hotspots (with cluster strength above 0.5) were detectable even when underreporting rate was between 50 and 80%. We further studied the effects of both spatial and temporal underreporting. Whereas temporal change of underreporting was not a problem in hotspots detection, spatial underreporting introduced significant errors producing both false positive and false negative results (hotspots). We conclude that both researchers and practitioners should be aware of the phenomenon of underreporting and should also try to maintain the same sampling effort of spatial reporting.
650    12
$a dopravní nehody $7 D000063
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a divoká zvířata $7 D000835
650    _2
$a databáze faktografické $7 D016208
650    _2
$a doprava $7 D014186
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Andrášik, Richard $u CDV - Transport Research Centre, Líšeňská 33a, 636 00, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: richard.andrasik@cdv.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00002657 $t Journal of environmental management $x 1095-8630 $g Roč. 275, č. - (2020), s. 111254
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32841791 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114152129 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1607946 $s 1118791
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 275 $c - $d 111254 $e 20200822 $i 1095-8630 $m Journal of environmental management $n J Environ Manage $x MED00002657
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...