Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Environmental pressures on stomatal size may drive plant genome size evolution: evidence from a natural experiment with Cape geophytes

P. Veselý, P. Šmarda, P. Bureš, C. Stirton, AM. Muasya, L. Mucina, L. Horová, K. Veselá, A. Šilerová, J. Šmerda, O. Knápek,

. 2020 ; 126 (2) : 323-330. [pub] 20200724

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028002
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The idea that genome (size) evolution in eukaryotes could be driven by environmental factors is still vigorously debated. In extant plants, genome size correlates positively with stomatal size, leading to the idea that conditions enabling the existence of large stomata in fossil plants also supported growth of their genome size. We test this inductive assumption in drought-adapted, prostrate-leaved Cape (South Africa) geophytes where, compared with their upright-leaved geophytic ancestors, stomata develop in a favourably humid microclimate formed underneath their leaves. METHODS: Stomatal parameters (leaf cuticle imprints) and genome size (flow cytometry) were measured in 16 closely related geophytic species pairs from seven plant families. In each pair, representing a different genus, we contrasted a prostrate-leaved species with its upright-leaved phylogenetic relative, the latter whose stomata are exposed to the ambient arid climate. KEY RESULTS: Except for one, all prostrate-leaves species had larger stomata, and in 13 of 16 pairs they also had larger genomes than their upright-leaved relatives. Stomatal density and theoretical maximum conductance were less in prostrate-leaved species with small guard cells (<1 pL) but showed no systematic difference in species pairs with larger guard cells (>1 pL). Giant stomata were observed in the prostrate-leaved Satyrium bicorne (89-137 µm long), despite its relatively small genome (2C = 9 Gbp). CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that climate, through selection on stomatal size, might be able to drive genome size evolution in plants. The data support the idea that plants from 'greenhouse' geological periods with large stomata might have generally had larger genome sizes when compared with extant plants, though this might not have been solely due to higher atmospheric CO2 in these periods but could also have been due to humid conditions prevailing at fossil deposit sites.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028002
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114152756.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/aob/mcaa095 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32474609
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Veselý, Pavel $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Environmental pressures on stomatal size may drive plant genome size evolution: evidence from a natural experiment with Cape geophytes / $c P. Veselý, P. Šmarda, P. Bureš, C. Stirton, AM. Muasya, L. Mucina, L. Horová, K. Veselá, A. Šilerová, J. Šmerda, O. Knápek,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The idea that genome (size) evolution in eukaryotes could be driven by environmental factors is still vigorously debated. In extant plants, genome size correlates positively with stomatal size, leading to the idea that conditions enabling the existence of large stomata in fossil plants also supported growth of their genome size. We test this inductive assumption in drought-adapted, prostrate-leaved Cape (South Africa) geophytes where, compared with their upright-leaved geophytic ancestors, stomata develop in a favourably humid microclimate formed underneath their leaves. METHODS: Stomatal parameters (leaf cuticle imprints) and genome size (flow cytometry) were measured in 16 closely related geophytic species pairs from seven plant families. In each pair, representing a different genus, we contrasted a prostrate-leaved species with its upright-leaved phylogenetic relative, the latter whose stomata are exposed to the ambient arid climate. KEY RESULTS: Except for one, all prostrate-leaves species had larger stomata, and in 13 of 16 pairs they also had larger genomes than their upright-leaved relatives. Stomatal density and theoretical maximum conductance were less in prostrate-leaved species with small guard cells (<1 pL) but showed no systematic difference in species pairs with larger guard cells (>1 pL). Giant stomata were observed in the prostrate-leaved Satyrium bicorne (89-137 µm long), despite its relatively small genome (2C = 9 Gbp). CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that climate, through selection on stomatal size, might be able to drive genome size evolution in plants. The data support the idea that plants from 'greenhouse' geological periods with large stomata might have generally had larger genome sizes when compared with extant plants, though this might not have been solely due to higher atmospheric CO2 in these periods but could also have been due to humid conditions prevailing at fossil deposit sites.
650    _2
$a délka genomu $7 D059646
650    _2
$a genom rostlinný $x genetika $7 D018745
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a listy rostlin $7 D018515
650    _2
$a průduchy rostlin $x genetika $7 D054046
651    _2
$a Jihoafrická republika $7 D013019
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Šmarda, Petr $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bureš, Petr $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stirton, Charles $u Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
700    1_
$a Muasya, A Muthama $u Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
700    1_
$a Mucina, Ladislav $u Iluka Chair in Vegetation Science and Biogeography, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Perth, Australia. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
700    1_
$a Horová, Lucie $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Veselá, Kristýna $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šilerová, Alexandra $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šmerda, Jakub $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Knápek, Ondřej $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 126, č. 2 (2020), s. 323-330
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474609 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114152754 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608337 $s 1119182
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 126 $c 2 $d 323-330 $e 20200724 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...