-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Recovery of fen peatland microbiomes and predicted functional profiles after rewetting
WJ. Emsens, R. van Diggelen, CJS. Aggenbach, T. Cajthaml, J. Frouz, A. Klimkowska, W. Kotowski, L. Kozub, Y. Liczner, E. Seeber, H. Silvennoinen, F. Tanneberger, J. Vicena, M. Wilk, E. Verbruggen,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011 do Před 1 rokem
ProQuest Central
od 2007-05-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2007-05-01 do Před 1 rokem
Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
od 2007
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2007
- MeSH
- mikrobiota * MeSH
- mokřady * MeSH
- půda MeSH
- uhlík analýza MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
Many of the world's peatlands have been affected by water table drawdown and subsequent loss of organic matter. Rewetting has been proposed as a measure to restore peatland functioning and to halt carbon loss, but its effectiveness is subject to debate. An important prerequisite for peatland recovery is a return of typical microbial communities, which drive key processes. To evaluate the effect of rewetting, we investigated 13 fen peatland areas across a wide (>1500 km) longitudinal gradient in Europe, in which we compared microbial communities between drained, undrained, and rewetted sites. There was a clear difference in microbial communities between drained and undrained fens, regardless of location. Community recovery upon rewetting was substantial in the majority of sites, and predictive functional profiling suggested a concomitant recovery of biogeochemical peatland functioning. However, communities in rewetted sites were only similar to those of undrained sites when soil organic matter quality (as expressed by cellulose fractions) and quantity were still sufficiently high. We estimate that a minimum organic matter content of ca. 70% is required to enable microbial recovery. We conclude that peatland recovery after rewetting is conditional on the level of drainage-induced degradation: severely altered physicochemical peat properties may preclude complete recovery for decades.
Charles University Institute for Environmental Studies Benátská 2 CZ 128282801 Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028054
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114152902.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41396-020-0639-x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32242082
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Emsens, Willem-Jan $u Ecosystem Management Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1C, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. willem-jan.emsens@uantwerpen.be. B-WARE Research Centre, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. willem-jan.emsens@uantwerpen.be.
- 245 10
- $a Recovery of fen peatland microbiomes and predicted functional profiles after rewetting / $c WJ. Emsens, R. van Diggelen, CJS. Aggenbach, T. Cajthaml, J. Frouz, A. Klimkowska, W. Kotowski, L. Kozub, Y. Liczner, E. Seeber, H. Silvennoinen, F. Tanneberger, J. Vicena, M. Wilk, E. Verbruggen,
- 520 9_
- $a Many of the world's peatlands have been affected by water table drawdown and subsequent loss of organic matter. Rewetting has been proposed as a measure to restore peatland functioning and to halt carbon loss, but its effectiveness is subject to debate. An important prerequisite for peatland recovery is a return of typical microbial communities, which drive key processes. To evaluate the effect of rewetting, we investigated 13 fen peatland areas across a wide (>1500 km) longitudinal gradient in Europe, in which we compared microbial communities between drained, undrained, and rewetted sites. There was a clear difference in microbial communities between drained and undrained fens, regardless of location. Community recovery upon rewetting was substantial in the majority of sites, and predictive functional profiling suggested a concomitant recovery of biogeochemical peatland functioning. However, communities in rewetted sites were only similar to those of undrained sites when soil organic matter quality (as expressed by cellulose fractions) and quantity were still sufficiently high. We estimate that a minimum organic matter content of ca. 70% is required to enable microbial recovery. We conclude that peatland recovery after rewetting is conditional on the level of drainage-induced degradation: severely altered physicochemical peat properties may preclude complete recovery for decades.
- 650 _2
- $a uhlík $x analýza $7 D002244
- 650 12
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a půda $7 D012987
- 650 12
- $a mokřady $7 D053833
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a van Diggelen, Rudy $u Ecosystem Management Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1C, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Aggenbach, Camiel J S $u Ecosystem Management Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1C, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. KWR Watercycle Research Institute, P.O. Box 1072, 3430 BB, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Cajthaml, Tomáš $u Charles University, Institute for Environmental Studies, Benátská 2, CZ-128282801, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Frouz, Jan $u Charles University, Institute for Environmental Studies, Benátská 2, CZ-128282801, Prague, Czech Republic. Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Biology and SoWa RI, Na Sádkách 7, CZ-37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Klimkowska, Agata $u Ecosystem Management Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1C, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Kotowski, Wiktor $u Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Conservation, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Centre for Biological and Chemical Sciences, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 101, 02-089, Warszawa, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Kozub, Lukasz $u Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Conservation, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Centre for Biological and Chemical Sciences, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 101, 02-089, Warszawa, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Liczner, Yvonne $u Ecosystem Management Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1C, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Seeber, Elke $u Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Soldmannstr. 15, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Silvennoinen, Hanna $u Soil Quality and Climate Change, Division for Environment and Natural Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Hogskoleveien 7, 1430, Aas, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Tanneberger, Franziska $u Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Soldmannstr. 15, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Vicena, Jakub $u Charles University, Institute for Environmental Studies, Benátská 2, CZ-128282801, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Wilk, Mateusz $u Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Conservation, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Centre for Biological and Chemical Sciences, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 101, 02-089, Warszawa, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Verbruggen, Erik $u Plants and Ecosystems Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1C, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181091 $t The ISME journal $x 1751-7370 $g Roč. 14, č. 7 (2020), s. 1701-1712
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32242082 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114152900 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1608389 $s 1119234
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 14 $c 7 $d 1701-1712 $e 20200403 $i 1751-7370 $m The ISME journal $n ISME J $x MED00181091
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105