-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The relationship between self-esteem of nurses and their choice of strategies to cope with workload burden
Lucia Dimunová, Anna Bérešová, Jana Raková, Ivana Rónyová, Terézia Fertaľová
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2014 do 2024
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
ProQuest Central
od 2018-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2014-01-01
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2014-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2018-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2014
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- psychický stres MeSH
- sebepojetí * MeSH
- sebezhodnocení (psychologie) MeSH
- zátěž pečovatele * MeSH
- zdravotní sestry v klinické praxi psychologie MeSH
- zdravotní sestry psychologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
Aim: To identify coping strategies nurses working in clinical practice use to manage workload, and, subsequently, to determine whether the choice of coping strategies is related to self-esteem. Design: Quantitative cross-sectional study. Methods: The sample consisted of 509 nurses. Two coping strategies questionnaires – Brief COPE and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale – RSES were used to collect data. The data were evaluated by descriptive statistical methods and analysed via ANOVA. Results: Nurses prefer to adopt a range of adaptive coping strategies rather than maladaptive coping strategies. The most frequently chosen adaptive coping strategies used by nurses in clinical practice are acceptance, planning, and active coping. We found that selection of coping strategies is closely related to self-esteem. We registered a significant difference in preferences for adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies as follows: nurses with high self-esteem scores (RSES) preferred adaptive coping strategies: active coping (p = 0.017), positive reframing (p = 0.001), planning (p = 0.020), and acceptance (p = 0.045). We identified selection of maladaptive coping strategies in nurses with average and low self-esteem scale results, i.e.: denial (p = 0.000), disengaged behaviour (p = 0.001), and self-blaming (p = 0.000). Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that it is important to support nurses’ self-esteem since this influences choice of adaptive coping strategies. These are an effective means of coping with the burden on nurses, which directly affects the quality of nursing care provided to patients in clinical practice.
Department of Nursing Care Faculty of Medicine Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice Slovakia
Department of Nursing Faculty of Health Care University of Presov Slovakia
St Elisabeth University of Health Care and Social Work Bratislava Slovakia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21000989
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221107161413.0
- 007
- cr|cn|
- 008
- 210117s2020 xr fs 000 0|eng||
- 009
- eAR
- 024 0_
- $a 10.15452/cejnm.2020.11.0023 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Dimunová, Lucia $7 xx0113469 $u Department of Nursing Care, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Slovakia
- 245 14
- $a The relationship between self-esteem of nurses and their choice of strategies to cope with workload burden / $c Lucia Dimunová, Anna Bérešová, Jana Raková, Ivana Rónyová, Terézia Fertaľová
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a Aim: To identify coping strategies nurses working in clinical practice use to manage workload, and, subsequently, to determine whether the choice of coping strategies is related to self-esteem. Design: Quantitative cross-sectional study. Methods: The sample consisted of 509 nurses. Two coping strategies questionnaires – Brief COPE and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale – RSES were used to collect data. The data were evaluated by descriptive statistical methods and analysed via ANOVA. Results: Nurses prefer to adopt a range of adaptive coping strategies rather than maladaptive coping strategies. The most frequently chosen adaptive coping strategies used by nurses in clinical practice are acceptance, planning, and active coping. We found that selection of coping strategies is closely related to self-esteem. We registered a significant difference in preferences for adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies as follows: nurses with high self-esteem scores (RSES) preferred adaptive coping strategies: active coping (p = 0.017), positive reframing (p = 0.001), planning (p = 0.020), and acceptance (p = 0.045). We identified selection of maladaptive coping strategies in nurses with average and low self-esteem scale results, i.e.: denial (p = 0.000), disengaged behaviour (p = 0.001), and self-blaming (p = 0.000). Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that it is important to support nurses’ self-esteem since this influences choice of adaptive coping strategies. These are an effective means of coping with the burden on nurses, which directly affects the quality of nursing care provided to patients in clinical practice.
- 650 _7
- $a lidé $7 D006801 $2 czmesh
- 650 17
- $a sebepojetí $7 D012649 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a sebezhodnocení (psychologie) $7 D012647 $2 czmesh
- 650 17
- $a zátěž pečovatele $7 D000084802 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a psychický stres $7 D013315 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a zdravotní sestry v klinické praxi $x psychologie $7 D009720 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a zdravotní sestry $x psychologie $7 D009726 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795 $2 czmesh
- 700 1_
- $a Bérešová, Anna $7 xx0137301 $u Department of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Raková, Jana $7 jo20181016630 $u Department of Nursing Care, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Rónyová, Ivana $7 _AN108769 $u St. Elisabeth University of Health Care and Social Work, Bratislava, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Fertaľová, Terézia $7 xx0133642 $u Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Care, University of Presov, Slovakia
- 773 0_
- $t Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x 2336-3517 $g Roč. 11, č. 3 (2020), s. 130-135 $w MED00183333
- 856 41
- $u https://cejnm.osu.cz/pdfs/cjn/2020/03/07.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210116162036 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221107161410 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1610316 $s 1121267
- BAS __
- $a 3 $a 4
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 11 $c 3 $d 130-135 $i 2336-3517 $m Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x MED00183333
- LZP __
- $c NLK183 $d 20221107 $a NLK 2021-05/dk