Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

A Randomized Comparison of Non-Channeled GlidescopeTM Titanium Versus Channeled KingVisionTM Videolaryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Obese Patients with BMI > 35 kg·m-2

T. Brozek, J. Bruthans, M. Porizka, J. Blaha, J. Ulrichova, P. Michalek,

. 2020 ; 10 (12) : . [pub] 20201129

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21001655

Grant support
MZCZ-DRO-VFN64165 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky

Videolaryngoscopes may improve intubating conditions in obese patients. A total of 110 patients with a body mass index > 35 kg∙m-2 were prospectively randomized to tracheal intubation using non-channeled Glidescope Titanium or channeled King Vision videolaryngoscope. The primary outcome was the time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included: total success rate, number of attempts, the quality of visualization, peri-procedural and post-proceduralcomplications. Time to the first effective breath was shorter with the King Vision (median; 95% CI)-36; 34-39 s vs. 42; 40-50 in the Glidescope group (p = 0.007). The total success rate was higher in the Glidescope group-100% vs. 89.1% (p = 0.03). There was a higher incidence of moderate and difficult laryngoscopy in the King Vision group. No difference was recorded in first attempt success rates, total number of attempts, use of additional maneuvers, intraoperative trauma, or any significant decrease in SpO2 during intubation. No serious complications were noted and the incidence of postoperative complaints was without difference. Although tracheal intubation with King Vision showed shorter time to the first breath, total success was higher in the Glidescope group, and all but one patients where intubation failed with the KingVision were subsequently intubated with the Glidescope.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21001655
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210126092808.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/diagnostics10121024 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33260374
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Brozek, Tomas $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic. Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
245    12
$a A Randomized Comparison of Non-Channeled GlidescopeTM Titanium Versus Channeled KingVisionTM Videolaryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Obese Patients with BMI > 35 kg·m-2. / $c T. Brozek, J. Bruthans, M. Porizka, J. Blaha, J. Ulrichova, P. Michalek,
520    9_
$a Videolaryngoscopes may improve intubating conditions in obese patients. A total of 110 patients with a body mass index > 35 kg∙m-2 were prospectively randomized to tracheal intubation using non-channeled Glidescope Titanium or channeled King Vision videolaryngoscope. The primary outcome was the time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included: total success rate, number of attempts, the quality of visualization, peri-procedural and post-proceduralcomplications. Time to the first effective breath was shorter with the King Vision (median; 95% CI)-36; 34-39 s vs. 42; 40-50 in the Glidescope group (p = 0.007). The total success rate was higher in the Glidescope group-100% vs. 89.1% (p = 0.03). There was a higher incidence of moderate and difficult laryngoscopy in the King Vision group. No difference was recorded in first attempt success rates, total number of attempts, use of additional maneuvers, intraoperative trauma, or any significant decrease in SpO2 during intubation. No serious complications were noted and the incidence of postoperative complaints was without difference. Although tracheal intubation with King Vision showed shorter time to the first breath, total success was higher in the Glidescope group, and all but one patients where intubation failed with the KingVision were subsequently intubated with the Glidescope.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bruthans, Jan $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Porizka, Michal $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Blaha, Jan $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ulrichova, Jitka $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Michalek, Pavel $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Anaesthesia, Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim BT41 2RL, UK.
773    0_
$w MED00195450 $t Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) $x 2075-4418 $g Roč. 10, č. 12 (2020)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33260374 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210126092803 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1613965 $s 1121939
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 10 $c 12 $e 20201129 $i 2075-4418 $m Diagnostics $n Diagnostics $x MED00195450
GRA    __
$a MZCZ-DRO-VFN64165 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105
Back

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options