-
Something wrong with this record ?
Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
M. Wilk, M. Gepfert, M. Krzysztofik, P. Stastny, A. Zajac, GC. Bogdanis,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2010
Free Medical Journals
from 2010
PubMed Central
from 2010
Europe PubMed Central
from 2010
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength - 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12-17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM (p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion (p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired.
Department of Sport Games Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czechia
Institute of Sport Sciences Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice Katowice Poland
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21001665
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210126092805.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fphys.2020.569915 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33329020
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Wilk, Michal $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
- 245 10
- $a Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads. / $c M. Wilk, M. Gepfert, M. Krzysztofik, P. Stastny, A. Zajac, GC. Bogdanis,
- 520 9_
- $a This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength - 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12-17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM (p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion (p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Gepfert, Mariola $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Krzysztofik, Michal $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Stastny, Petr $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Zajac, Adam $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Bogdanis, Gregory C $u School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174601 $t Frontiers in physiology $x 1664-042X $g Roč. 11, č. - (2020), s. 569915
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33329020 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210126092801 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1613971 $s 1121949
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 11 $c - $d 569915 $e 20201127 $i 1664-042X $m Frontiers in physiology $n Front. physiol. $x MED00174601
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105