• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Randomized comparison of functional electric stimulation in posturally corrected position and motor program activating therapy: treating foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis

T. Prokopiusova, M. Pavlikova, M. Markova, K. Rasova

. 2020 ; 56 (4) : 394-402. [pub] 20200508

Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21012308

BACKGROUND: Functional electric stimulation (FES) is recommended for foot drop in multiple sclerosis, although little is known about its therapeutic effect. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate a therapeutic effect immediately and two months after program termination (persistent and delayed effect) of a new approach using FES in combination with correcting the patients' postural system. More specifically, we evaluate the effects of this approach on the patients' clinical functions and compared it with individual physiotherapy. DESIGN: Parallel randomized blind trial. SETTING: Two-month-long treatments, functional electric stimulation in posturally corrected position (group 1) and neuroproprioceptive facilitation and inhibition physiotherapy called motor program activating therapy (group 2). POPULATION: Forty-four subjects with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Primary outcomes: gait (the 2-Minute Walk Test; Timed 25-Foot Walk test; Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12) and balance (by e.g. Berg Balance Scale [BBS], the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC], Timed Up-and-Go Test [TUG]). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: mobility, cognition, fatigue and subjects' perceptions (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale [MSIS], Euroqol-5 dimensions-5 levels [EQ-5D-5L]). RESULTS: Group 1 showed immediate therapeutic effect in BBS (P=0.008), ABC (P=0.04) and EQ-5D-5L (self-care, P=0.019, mobility P=0.005). The improvement in EQ-5D-5L persisted and in TUG-cognitive we documented a delayed effect (P=0.005). Group 2 showed an immediate improvement in BBS (P=0.025), MSIS (P=0.043) and several aspects of daily life (the effect on health today was significantly higher than in group 1, significant difference between groups P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: FES in the posturally corrected position has an immediate therapeutic effect on balance and patients' perceptions comparable to motor program activating therapy, and higher persistent and even delayed therapeutic effect. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study results point to the importance of correcting the patients' posture when applying FES, the possibility to treat foot drop by individual physiotherapy and the activation of the patients' auto reparative processes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21012308
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507102203.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06104-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32383574
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Prokopiusova, Terezie $u Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Randomized comparison of functional electric stimulation in posturally corrected position and motor program activating therapy: treating foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis / $c T. Prokopiusova, M. Pavlikova, M. Markova, K. Rasova
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Functional electric stimulation (FES) is recommended for foot drop in multiple sclerosis, although little is known about its therapeutic effect. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate a therapeutic effect immediately and two months after program termination (persistent and delayed effect) of a new approach using FES in combination with correcting the patients' postural system. More specifically, we evaluate the effects of this approach on the patients' clinical functions and compared it with individual physiotherapy. DESIGN: Parallel randomized blind trial. SETTING: Two-month-long treatments, functional electric stimulation in posturally corrected position (group 1) and neuroproprioceptive facilitation and inhibition physiotherapy called motor program activating therapy (group 2). POPULATION: Forty-four subjects with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Primary outcomes: gait (the 2-Minute Walk Test; Timed 25-Foot Walk test; Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12) and balance (by e.g. Berg Balance Scale [BBS], the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC], Timed Up-and-Go Test [TUG]). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: mobility, cognition, fatigue and subjects' perceptions (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale [MSIS], Euroqol-5 dimensions-5 levels [EQ-5D-5L]). RESULTS: Group 1 showed immediate therapeutic effect in BBS (P=0.008), ABC (P=0.04) and EQ-5D-5L (self-care, P=0.019, mobility P=0.005). The improvement in EQ-5D-5L persisted and in TUG-cognitive we documented a delayed effect (P=0.005). Group 2 showed an immediate improvement in BBS (P=0.025), MSIS (P=0.043) and several aspects of daily life (the effect on health today was significantly higher than in group 1, significant difference between groups P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: FES in the posturally corrected position has an immediate therapeutic effect on balance and patients' perceptions comparable to motor program activating therapy, and higher persistent and even delayed therapeutic effect. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study results point to the importance of correcting the patients' posture when applying FES, the possibility to treat foot drop by individual physiotherapy and the activation of the patients' auto reparative processes.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a posuzování pracovní neschopnosti $7 D004185
650    _2
$a elektrostimulační terapie $x metody $7 D004599
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a neurologické poruchy chůze $x terapie $7 D020233
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a roztroušená skleróza $x terapie $7 D009103
650    _2
$a neuropatie nervus peroneus $x terapie $7 D020427
650    _2
$a posturální rovnováha $x fyziologie $7 D004856
650    _2
$a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
650    _2
$a test chůzí $7 D000070857
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Pavlikova, Marketa $u Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Markova, Magdalena $u Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rasova, Kamila $u Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic - kamila.rasova@gmail.com
773    0_
$w MED00174347 $t European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine $x 1973-9095 $g Roč. 56, č. 4 (2020), s. 394-402
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32383574 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507102203 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1650637 $s 1132687
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 56 $c 4 $d 394-402 $e 20200508 $i 1973-9095 $m European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine $n Eur. j. phys. rehabil. med. $x MED00174347
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...