-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Prevalence of Polypharmacy, Hyperpolypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AS. Bhagavathula, K. Vidyasagar, M. Chhabra, M. Rashid, R. Sharma, DK. Bandari, D. Fialova
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2010
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
PubMed Central
od 2010
Europe PubMed Central
od 2010
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2010
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background: Older people often receive multiple medications for chronic conditions, which often result in polypharmacy (concomitant use of 5‒9 medicines) and hyperpolypharmacy (concomitant use of ≥10 medicines). A limited number of studies have been performed to evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy, and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older people of developing countries. The present study aimed to investigate regional variations in the prevalence of polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy, and PIM use in older people (60 + years) in India. Methods: Studies were identified using Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases published from inception (2002) to September 31, 2020. Out of the total 1890 articles, 27 were included in the study. Results: Overall, the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy was 49% (95% confidence interval: 42-56; p < 0.01), hyperpolypharmacy was 31% (21-40; p < 0.01), and PIM use was 28% (24-32; p < 0.01) among older Indian adults. Polypharmacy was more prevalent in North-east India (65%, 50-79), whereas hyperpolypharmacy was prevalent in south India (33%, 17-48). Region-wize estimates for the pooled prevalence of PIM use in India were as follows: 23% (21-25) in East, 33% in West (24-42), 17.8% in North (11-23), and 32% (26-38) in South India. The prevalence of PIM use in adults aged ≥70°years was 35% (28-42), in those taking more medications (≥5.5/day) was 27% (22-31), and in adults using a high number of PIMs (≥3) was 29% (22-36). Subgroup analysis showed that cross-sectional studies had a higher pooled prevalence of polypharmacy 55% (44-65) than cohorts 45% (37-54). Hyperpolypharmacy in inpatient care settings was 37% (26-47), whereas PIM use was higher in private hospitals 31% (24-38) than government hospitals 25% (19-31). Conclusion: Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy are widely prevalent in India. About 28% of older Indian adults are affected by PIM use. Thus, appropriate steps are needed to promote rational geriatric prescribing in India. Systematic Review Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier [CRD42019141037].
Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia
Department of Pharmacy Practice Sri Adichunchanagiri College of Pharmacy Mandya India
Indo Soviet Friendship College of Pharmacy Moga India
University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Kakatiya University Warangal India
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21017725
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210729104011.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210726s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fphar.2021.685518 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34093207
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Bhagavathula, Akshaya S $u Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Prevalence of Polypharmacy, Hyperpolypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / $c AS. Bhagavathula, K. Vidyasagar, M. Chhabra, M. Rashid, R. Sharma, DK. Bandari, D. Fialova
- 520 9_
- $a Background: Older people often receive multiple medications for chronic conditions, which often result in polypharmacy (concomitant use of 5‒9 medicines) and hyperpolypharmacy (concomitant use of ≥10 medicines). A limited number of studies have been performed to evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy, and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older people of developing countries. The present study aimed to investigate regional variations in the prevalence of polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy, and PIM use in older people (60 + years) in India. Methods: Studies were identified using Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases published from inception (2002) to September 31, 2020. Out of the total 1890 articles, 27 were included in the study. Results: Overall, the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy was 49% (95% confidence interval: 42-56; p < 0.01), hyperpolypharmacy was 31% (21-40; p < 0.01), and PIM use was 28% (24-32; p < 0.01) among older Indian adults. Polypharmacy was more prevalent in North-east India (65%, 50-79), whereas hyperpolypharmacy was prevalent in south India (33%, 17-48). Region-wize estimates for the pooled prevalence of PIM use in India were as follows: 23% (21-25) in East, 33% in West (24-42), 17.8% in North (11-23), and 32% (26-38) in South India. The prevalence of PIM use in adults aged ≥70°years was 35% (28-42), in those taking more medications (≥5.5/day) was 27% (22-31), and in adults using a high number of PIMs (≥3) was 29% (22-36). Subgroup analysis showed that cross-sectional studies had a higher pooled prevalence of polypharmacy 55% (44-65) than cohorts 45% (37-54). Hyperpolypharmacy in inpatient care settings was 37% (26-47), whereas PIM use was higher in private hospitals 31% (24-38) than government hospitals 25% (19-31). Conclusion: Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy are widely prevalent in India. About 28% of older Indian adults are affected by PIM use. Thus, appropriate steps are needed to promote rational geriatric prescribing in India. Systematic Review Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier [CRD42019141037].
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vidyasagar, Kota $u University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal, India
- 700 1_
- $a Chhabra, Manik $u Indo-Soviet Friendship College of Pharmacy, Moga, India
- 700 1_
- $a Rashid, Muhammed $u Department of Pharmacy Practice, Sri Adichunchanagiri College of Pharmacy, Mandya, India
- 700 1_
- $a Sharma, Rishabh $u Indo-Soviet Friendship College of Pharmacy, Moga, India
- 700 1_
- $a Bandari, Deepak K $u Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Fialova, Daniela $u Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czechia $u Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174597 $t Frontiers in pharmacology $x 1663-9812 $g Roč. 12, č. - (2021), s. 685518
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34093207 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210726 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210729104010 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1676403 $s 1138167
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 12 $c - $d 685518 $e 20210519 $i 1663-9812 $m Frontiers in pharmacology $n Front Pharmacol $x MED00174597
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210726