-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Algorithm as a "Road Map" from the First Stratification of the Patient to the Final Treatment Decision
H. Sedláčková, O. Dolejšová, M. Hora, J. Ferda, O. Hes, O. Topolčan, R. Fuchsová, R. Kučera
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001674.
BBMRI-CZ: Biobank network - a versatile platform for the research of the etiopathogenesis of diseases
FNPl, 00669806
Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - conceptual development of research organization (Faculty Hospital in Pilsen - FNPl, 00669806)
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
PubMed
33917253
DOI
10.3390/life11040324
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The diagnostics of prostate cancer are currently based on three pillars: prostate biomarker panel, imaging techniques, and histological verification. This paper presents a diagnostic algorithm that can serve as a "road map": from initial patient stratification to the final decision regarding treatment. The algorithm is based on a review of the current literature combined with our own experience. Diagnostic algorithms are a feature of an advanced healthcare system in which all steps are consciously coordinated and optimized to ensure the proper individualization of the treatment process. The prostate cancer diagnostic algorithm was created using the prostate specific antigen and in particular the Prostate Health Index in the first line of patient stratification. It then continued on the diagnostic pathway via imaging techniques, biopsy, or active surveillance, and then on to the treatment decision itself. In conclusion, the prostate cancer diagnostic algorithm presented here is a functional tool for initial patient stratification, comprehensive staging, and aggressiveness assessment. Above all, emphasis is placed on the use of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in the first stratification of the patients as a predictor of aggressiveness and clinical stage of prostrate cancer (PCa). The inclusion of PHI in the algorithm significantly increases the accuracy and speed of the diagnostic procedure and allows to choose the optimal pathway just from the beginning. The use of advanced diagnostic techniques allows us to move towards to a more advanced level of cancer care. This diagnostics algorithm has become a standard of care in our hospital. The algorithm is continuously validated and modified based on our results.
Department of Urology Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen University Hospital 305 99 Pilsen Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21018018
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210729104109.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210726s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/life11040324 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33917253
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Sedláčková, Hana $u Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital, 305 99 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Algorithm as a "Road Map" from the First Stratification of the Patient to the Final Treatment Decision / $c H. Sedláčková, O. Dolejšová, M. Hora, J. Ferda, O. Hes, O. Topolčan, R. Fuchsová, R. Kučera
- 520 9_
- $a The diagnostics of prostate cancer are currently based on three pillars: prostate biomarker panel, imaging techniques, and histological verification. This paper presents a diagnostic algorithm that can serve as a "road map": from initial patient stratification to the final decision regarding treatment. The algorithm is based on a review of the current literature combined with our own experience. Diagnostic algorithms are a feature of an advanced healthcare system in which all steps are consciously coordinated and optimized to ensure the proper individualization of the treatment process. The prostate cancer diagnostic algorithm was created using the prostate specific antigen and in particular the Prostate Health Index in the first line of patient stratification. It then continued on the diagnostic pathway via imaging techniques, biopsy, or active surveillance, and then on to the treatment decision itself. In conclusion, the prostate cancer diagnostic algorithm presented here is a functional tool for initial patient stratification, comprehensive staging, and aggressiveness assessment. Above all, emphasis is placed on the use of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in the first stratification of the patients as a predictor of aggressiveness and clinical stage of prostrate cancer (PCa). The inclusion of PHI in the algorithm significantly increases the accuracy and speed of the diagnostic procedure and allows to choose the optimal pathway just from the beginning. The use of advanced diagnostic techniques allows us to move towards to a more advanced level of cancer care. This diagnostics algorithm has become a standard of care in our hospital. The algorithm is continuously validated and modified based on our results.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Dolejšová, Olga $u Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital, 305 99 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hora, Milan $u Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital, 305 99 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ferda, Jiří $u Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital, 304 60 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hes, Ondřej $u Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital, 305 99 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Topolčan, Ondřej $u Department of Immunochemistry Diagnostics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital, 305 99 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fuchsová, Radka $u Department of Immunochemistry Diagnostics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital, 305 99 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kučera, Radek $u Department of Immunochemistry Diagnostics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital, 305 99 Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty in Pilsen, Charles University, 304 60 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00186366 $t Life (Basel, Switzerland) $x 2075-1729 $g Roč. 11, č. 4 (2021)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33917253 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210726 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210729104108 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1676500 $s 1138460
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 11 $c 4 $e 20210407 $i 2075-1729 $m Life $n Life (Basel) $x MED00186366
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001674. $p BBMRI-CZ: Biobank network - a versatile platform for the research of the etiopathogenesis of diseases
- GRA __
- $a FNPl, 00669806 $p Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - conceptual development of research organization (Faculty Hospital in Pilsen - FNPl, 00669806)
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210726