-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Intra-laboratory comparison of four analytical platforms for lipidomic quantitation using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography or supercritical fluid chromatography coupled to quadrupole - time-of-flight mass spectrometry
M. Chocholoušková, D. Wolrab, R. Jirásko, H. Študentová, B. Melichar, M. Holčapek
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- chromatografie kapalinová MeSH
- hmotnostní spektrometrie MeSH
- hydrofobní a hydrofilní interakce MeSH
- laboratoře MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lipidomika * MeSH
- superkritická fluidní chromatografie * MeSH
- vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The lipidomic research is currently devoting considerable effort to the harmonization that should enable the generation of comparable and accurate quantitative lipidomic data across different laboratories and regardless of the mass spectrometry-based platform used. In the present study, we systematically investigate the effects of the experimental setup on quantitative lipidomics data obtained by two lipid class separation approaches, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and ultrahigh-performance supercritical fluid chromatography (UHPSFC), coupled to two different quadrupole - time of flight (QTOF) mass spectrometers from the same vendor. This approach is applied for measurements of 268 human plasma samples of healthy volunteers and renal cell carcinoma patients resulting in four data sets. We investigate and visualize differences among these data sets by multivariate data analysis methods, such as principal component analysis (PCA), orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), box plots, and logarithmic correlations of molar concentrations of individual lipid species. The results indicate that even measurements in the same laboratory for the same samples using different analytical platforms may yield slight variations in the molar concentrations determined. The normalization to a reference sample with defined lipid concentrations can further diminish these small differences, resulting in highly homogenous molar concentrations of individual lipid species. This strategy indicates a potential approach towards the reporting of comparable quantitative results independent from the quantitative approach and mass spectrometer used, which is important for a wider acceptance of lipidomics data in various biomarker inter-laboratory studies and ring trials.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21018369
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830095944.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122367 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33965032
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Chocholoušková, Michaela $u University of Pardubice, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Studentská 573, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Intra-laboratory comparison of four analytical platforms for lipidomic quantitation using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography or supercritical fluid chromatography coupled to quadrupole - time-of-flight mass spectrometry / $c M. Chocholoušková, D. Wolrab, R. Jirásko, H. Študentová, B. Melichar, M. Holčapek
- 520 9_
- $a The lipidomic research is currently devoting considerable effort to the harmonization that should enable the generation of comparable and accurate quantitative lipidomic data across different laboratories and regardless of the mass spectrometry-based platform used. In the present study, we systematically investigate the effects of the experimental setup on quantitative lipidomics data obtained by two lipid class separation approaches, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and ultrahigh-performance supercritical fluid chromatography (UHPSFC), coupled to two different quadrupole - time of flight (QTOF) mass spectrometers from the same vendor. This approach is applied for measurements of 268 human plasma samples of healthy volunteers and renal cell carcinoma patients resulting in four data sets. We investigate and visualize differences among these data sets by multivariate data analysis methods, such as principal component analysis (PCA), orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), box plots, and logarithmic correlations of molar concentrations of individual lipid species. The results indicate that even measurements in the same laboratory for the same samples using different analytical platforms may yield slight variations in the molar concentrations determined. The normalization to a reference sample with defined lipid concentrations can further diminish these small differences, resulting in highly homogenous molar concentrations of individual lipid species. This strategy indicates a potential approach towards the reporting of comparable quantitative results independent from the quantitative approach and mass spectrometer used, which is important for a wider acceptance of lipidomics data in various biomarker inter-laboratory studies and ring trials.
- 650 _2
- $a vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie $7 D002851
- 650 _2
- $a chromatografie kapalinová $7 D002853
- 650 12
- $a superkritická fluidní chromatografie $7 D025924
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hydrofobní a hydrofilní interakce $7 D057927
- 650 _2
- $a laboratoře $7 D007753
- 650 12
- $a lipidomika $7 D000081362
- 650 _2
- $a hmotnostní spektrometrie $7 D013058
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Wolrab, Denise $u University of Pardubice, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Studentská 573, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jirásko, Robert $u University of Pardubice, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Studentská 573, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Študentová, Hana $u Palacký University, Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Department of Oncology, I.P. Pavlova 6, 775 20, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Melichar, Bohuslav $u Palacký University, Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Department of Oncology, I.P. Pavlova 6, 775 20, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Holčapek, Michal $u University of Pardubice, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Studentská 573, 532 10, Pardubice, Czech Republic. Electronic address: Michal.Holcapek@upce.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004484 $t Talanta $x 1873-3573 $g Roč. 231, č. - (2021), s. 122367
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33965032 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830095944 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1689485 $s 1138813
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 231 $c - $d 122367 $e 20210402 $i 1873-3573 $m Talanta $n Talanta $x MED00004484
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728