• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Computed tomography with a full FOV photon-counting detector in a clinical setting, the first experience

J. Ferda, T. Vendiš, T. Flohr, B. Schmidt, A. Henning, S. Ulzheimer, L. Pecen, E. Ferdová, J. Baxa, H. Mírka

. 2021 ; 137 (-) : 109614. [pub] 20210224

Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21018910

OBJECTIVES: to assess the feasibility of CT with an integrated photon-counting-detector system (PC-CT) in the body imaging of clinical patients. METHODS: 120 examinations using photon counting detector CT were evaluated in six groups: 1/ a standard-dose lung, 2/ low-dose lung, 3/ ultra-high resolution (UHR) lung, 4/ standard-dose abdominal, 5/ lower-dose abdominal, 6/ UHR abdominal CTA. All CT examinations were performed on a single-source prototype device equipped with a photon counting detector covering a 50 cm scan field of view. Standard dose examinations were performed with the use of detector element size of 0.4 mm, ultra-high-resolution examinations with the detector element size of 0.2 mm, respectively. The stability of the system during imaging was tested. The diagnostic quality of the acquired images was assessed based on the imaging of key structures and the noise level in five-point scale, the effective dose equivalent, dose length product and noise level, and also relation to body mass index and body surface area were compared with three similar groups of CT images made with energy integrating high end scanner. The parameters were evaluated using Wilcoxon test for independent samples, the independence was tested using Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: When PC-CT images radiation dose is compared with the similar imaging using energy integrating CT, the PC-CT shows lower dose in ultra-high resolution mode, the dose is significantly lower (p < 0.0001), the standard dose examinations were performed with the comparable radiation doses. PC-CT exhibited the significantly higher ratio between parenchyma signal and background noise both in lung and in abdominal imaging (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PC-CT showed imaging stability and excellent diagnostic quality at dose values that are comparable or better to the quality of energy integrating CT, the better signal and improved resolution is most important advantage of photon counting detector CT over energy integrating detector CT.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21018910
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100500.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109614 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33657475
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Ferda, Jiří $u Department of the Imaging, University Hospital Pilsen, Alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czechia. Electronic address: ferda@fnplzen.cz
245    10
$a Computed tomography with a full FOV photon-counting detector in a clinical setting, the first experience / $c J. Ferda, T. Vendiš, T. Flohr, B. Schmidt, A. Henning, S. Ulzheimer, L. Pecen, E. Ferdová, J. Baxa, H. Mírka
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: to assess the feasibility of CT with an integrated photon-counting-detector system (PC-CT) in the body imaging of clinical patients. METHODS: 120 examinations using photon counting detector CT were evaluated in six groups: 1/ a standard-dose lung, 2/ low-dose lung, 3/ ultra-high resolution (UHR) lung, 4/ standard-dose abdominal, 5/ lower-dose abdominal, 6/ UHR abdominal CTA. All CT examinations were performed on a single-source prototype device equipped with a photon counting detector covering a 50 cm scan field of view. Standard dose examinations were performed with the use of detector element size of 0.4 mm, ultra-high-resolution examinations with the detector element size of 0.2 mm, respectively. The stability of the system during imaging was tested. The diagnostic quality of the acquired images was assessed based on the imaging of key structures and the noise level in five-point scale, the effective dose equivalent, dose length product and noise level, and also relation to body mass index and body surface area were compared with three similar groups of CT images made with energy integrating high end scanner. The parameters were evaluated using Wilcoxon test for independent samples, the independence was tested using Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: When PC-CT images radiation dose is compared with the similar imaging using energy integrating CT, the PC-CT shows lower dose in ultra-high resolution mode, the dose is significantly lower (p < 0.0001), the standard dose examinations were performed with the comparable radiation doses. PC-CT exhibited the significantly higher ratio between parenchyma signal and background noise both in lung and in abdominal imaging (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PC-CT showed imaging stability and excellent diagnostic quality at dose values that are comparable or better to the quality of energy integrating CT, the better signal and improved resolution is most important advantage of photon counting detector CT over energy integrating detector CT.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a plíce $7 D008168
650    _2
$a fantomy radiodiagnostické $7 D019047
650    12
$a fotony $7 D017785
650    12
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vendiš, Tomáš $u Department of the Imaging, University Hospital Pilsen, Alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czechia
700    1_
$a Flohr, Thomas $u Computed Tomography Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Computed Tomography, 91301, Forchheim, Germany
700    1_
$a Schmidt, Bernhard $u Computed Tomography Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Computed Tomography, 91301, Forchheim, Germany
700    1_
$a Henning, André $u Computed Tomography Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Computed Tomography, 91301, Forchheim, Germany
700    1_
$a Ulzheimer, Stefan $u Computed Tomography Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Computed Tomography, 91301, Forchheim, Germany
700    1_
$a Pecen, Ladislav $u Department of the Imaging, University Hospital Pilsen, Alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czechia
700    1_
$a Ferdová, Eva $u Department of the Imaging, University Hospital Pilsen, Alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czechia
700    1_
$a Baxa, Jan $u Department of the Imaging, University Hospital Pilsen, Alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czechia
700    1_
$a Mírka, Hynek $u Department of the Imaging, University Hospital Pilsen, Alej Svobody 80, 323 00, Pilsen, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00009640 $t European journal of radiology $x 1872-7727 $g Roč. 137, č. - (2021), s. 109614
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33657475 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100501 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1689868 $s 1139356
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 137 $c - $d 109614 $e 20210224 $i 1872-7727 $m European journal of radiology $n Eur J Radiol $x MED00009640
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...